<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>The Museum of Hoaxes</title>
    <link>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com</link>
    <description>Examining dubious claims and mischief of all kinds.</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>alex@museumofhoaxes.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009 Alex Boese</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-07-03T16:13:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Urban Legend Awards Announced]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/urban_legend_awards_announced/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/urban_legend_awards_announced/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[It's not what you think it is. The Urban Legend Awards will honor "contributions made by volunteers, local leaders, businesses, churches, partners and community members to the urban AIDS response in Swaziland." Maybe the term "urban legend" doesn't mean the same thing in Swaziland that it means in the US and UK. [<a href="http://www.observer.org.sz/index.php?news=5502">Swazi Observer</a>]<br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6505/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-07-03T17:13:48+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Another case of a phony veteran]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/another_case_of_a_phony_veteran/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/another_case_of_a_phony_veteran/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Jack Livesey claimed he was in the Parachute regiment of the British Army, did five tours of duty in Northern Ireland, and won a military medal. He was a guest of honor at the 25th anniversary commemorations of the Falklands War. <br />
<br />
But the British Ministry of Defense says, "Jack Livesey (DOB 15/05/54) only served in the British Army in the Army Catering Corps from December 1971 until April 1974."<br />
<br />
Livesey also claims he was a miltary adviser to Saving Private Ryan, though he wasn't paid a fee which is why, he says, there was never any public acknowledgment of his help. [<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/cambridgeshire/8130351.stm">BBC News</a>]<br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6504/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-07-03T16:44:04+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Here we go again. Gorgeous Guy says he&#8217;s suing me]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/here_we_go_again._gorgeous_guy_says_hes_suing_me/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/here_we_go_again._gorgeous_guy_says_hes_suing_me/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I just heard from a voice from the past. <a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/archive/permalink/gorgeous_guy/">"Gorgeous Guy,"</a> who was briefly a web celebrity back in 2001, sent me an email to let me know that he's going to be filing a lawsuit against me for defamation of his character.<br />
<br />
Sigh  <img src="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/EE/images/smileys/confused.gif" width="19" height="19" alt="confused" style="border:0;" />.  Seems like <a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/1621/">Carrie Devorah</a> all over again.<br />
<br />
So I'm looking at the brief article I have about Gorgeous Guy and trying to figure out if there's anything even conceivably defamatory in there. Consider what I say versus what's on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorgeous_Guy">wikipedia</a>. CNN even <a href="http://archives.cnn.com/2001/TECH/internet/07/11/internet.fame/index.html">claims</a> that "Gorgeous Guy" admitted he was responsible for the hoax, though it was my understanding that he always claimed to have no knowledge of how the whole thing transpired.<br />
<br />
I've had occasional email from him before. He actually uses "TheRealGorgeousGuy" as his email name. In the past he's let me know whether there still seems to be interest in the case, based on the volume of his email. Odd that he waited eight years to decide I was making defamatory claims about him.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6503/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-07-03T15:42:10+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Connecticut woman almost runs over Sasquatch]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/connecticut_woman_almost_runs_over_sasquatch/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/connecticut_woman_almost_runs_over_sasquatch/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A Connecticut woman driving along Unquowa Road told police that she "almost hit Sasquatch." Upon investigation, the police discovered that Sasquatch was really "a 16-year-old boy dressed in a gorilla-like costume." He was standing at the corner in his costume, waving at cars as they passed. (<a href="http://www.newstimes.com/ci_12739938">news times</a>)<br />
<br />
Reminds me of the <a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/archive/permalink/the_little_blue_man_hoax/">Little Blue Man Hoax</a> of 1958.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6502/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-07-03T00:36:31+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[The Great Death Rumor Craze of 2009: An Analysis]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/the_great_death_rumor_craze_of_2009_an_analysis/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/the_great_death_rumor_craze_of_2009_an_analysis/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The glut of celebrity death hoaxes during the past week has been a textbook case of how rumors spread. It's a great example of collective behavior in action. As such, the death rumors provide an opportunity for journalists to discuss some of the things scholars have learned about the spread of rumors during the past fifty years of research. Unfortunately, the insights of social psychologists don't seem to be getting much coverage. Instead, journalists are focusing on the rumors as an internet phenomenon. See <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/07/01/celebrity.death.pranks/index.html" target="_blank">this CNN article</a> as an example. It warns us that:<br />
<br />
<div style="margin: 2px 10px 0px 5px; padding: 1px 5px 0px 10px; border-left: 3px solid #ddd; font-size: 95%;">The situation is calling attention to the changing state of the news media: As information online moves faster and comes from more sources, it's more difficult to verify what's true and what may be shockingly false...<br />
Others say the fake deaths, or "death pranks," show an inherent problem with the decentralization of news on the Internet.</div><br />
This seems like a non-issue to me. Rumors are an ancient phenomenon. The internet is simply the technology people are using to communicate them nowadays. And while the internet does allow information to spread faster, from more sources, it also allows misinformation to be debunked faster. Before the internet people found many other 'decentralized' ways of spreading rumors: fax, telephone, college radio stations, letters, corner drugstores, or word of mouth. The technology has changed, but human behavior remains the same.<br />
<br />
If I were a journalist, these are some of the points about rumors I would try to highlight:<ul> <li>Rumors spread most during situations that are confusing or ambiguous and in which there's a mood of collective excitement. People want more information, and that information isn't available. So they look to alternative sources.</li> <li>There are always alternative sources of information. The supply of information is never centralized. Social groups (such as teenagers) tend to establish their own communication networks, and they'll turn to those if they're not getting what they want from mainstream sources. In 1969, when the <a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/archive/permalink/paul_is_dead/" target="_blank">Paul is Dead rumor</a> was spreading, young people relied on college radio and college newspapers to spread the rumor. Today they rely on twitter.</li> <li>Rumors don't spread randomly. Instead, they tend to follow along social lines. The recent rumors have spread among young people using twitter.</li> <li>Status seeking is an important motive in why people spread these rumors. Being able to pass along new information makes people feel important in the eyes of their friends, even if the information later turns out to be bogus. Similarly, pranksters like to make up these hoaxes to gain approval from their social groups.</li> <li>Rumors often serve as a form of entertainment and emotional release. It gives people a way to project their anxieties onto the world. In fact, rumors often spread without being believed, which seems to be the case with the recent death hoaxes. An Australian news station fell for the Jeff Goldblum rumor, but the majority of twitter users seem to have expressed doubt about the rumors as they simultaneously repeated them. Ironically, those debunking the rumors have spread them far further than have those who actually believed them.</li> </ul>All of these are standard observations about rumors that you can find in most social psychology textbooks. But like I said, it's not what journalists are focusing on.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6501/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-07-01T18:25:18+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Is one of the Michael Jackson rehearsal photos faked?]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/is_one_of_the_michael_jackson_rehearsal_photos_faked/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/is_one_of_the_michael_jackson_rehearsal_photos_faked/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.holymoly.com/news/are-jackson-rehearsal-photographs-fake-one-seems-be17697.html" target="_blank">Holymoly.com</a> suggests that one of the rehearsal photographs of Michael Jackson, said to have been taken the night before he died, is fake. They point out that "the backdrop mysteriously disappears in between Michael's legs." They describe this as a "classic photoshop blunder" and suggest "this could be a fake composite, with Jackson's image being super imposed on top of another pic."<br />
<br />
It does look unusual, but I wouldn't be so quick to label it as photoshopped. That may just be how the backdrop looks in that area. (You would need to see an unobstructed view of the entire backdrop to be sure.) And what would be the point of photoshopping the picture? Is holymoly.com suggesting that Jackson didn't actually attend the rehearsal? That seems unlikely as there are other pictures of Jackson at the rehearsal, and (presumably) witnesses.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://hoaxblog.s3.amazonaws.com/jackson_rehearsal.jpg" alt=""><br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6500/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-07-01T05:47:56+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[The Evolution of the Werewolf and Bigfoot]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/the_evolution_of_the_werewolf_and_bigfoot/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/the_evolution_of_the_werewolf_and_bigfoot/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Brian Regal, a historian of science at Kean University in New Jersey, has an interesting theory about the relationship between werewolves and Bigfoot. He notes that hundreds of years ago werewolves were very prominent in popular culture. But during the past 150 years the werewolf's place in popular culture has declined, while Bigfoot has grown enormously in popularity. He attributes this shift to the theory of evolution. From <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090616080135.htm" target="_blank">Science Daily</a>:<br />
<br />
<div style="margin: 2px 10px 0px 5px; padding: 1px 5px 0px 10px; border-left: 3px solid #ddd; font-size: 95%;">From the late 19th century onwards, stories of werewolf encounters tailed away significantly, says Regal. "The spread of the idea of evolution helped kill off the werewolf because a canid-human hybrid makes no sense from an evolutionary point of view," he says. "The ape-human hybrid, however, is not only evolutionarily acceptable, it is the basis of human evolution."</div><br />
Contrast this with Joshua Buhs' theory, detailed in his new book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0226079791/?tag=themuseumofho-20" target="_blank">Bigfoot: The Life and Times of a Legend</a>, in which he attributes Bigfoot's popularity in the 20th century to working-class men who saw in Bigfoot "an icon of untamed masculinity, a populist rebel against scientific elites, the last champion of authentic reality against a plastic, image-driven, effeminate consumer society." (text from the Publishers Weekly review)<br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6499/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-06-30T19:02:50+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Official verdict: Steorn didn&#8217;t develop free energy technology]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/official_verdict_steorn_didnt_develop_free_energy_technology/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/official_verdict_steorn_didnt_develop_free_energy_technology/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Back in <a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/steorn/" target="_blank">August 2006</a>, the Irish company Steorn declared it had developed "revolutionary free energy technology." To back up its claim, they ran an ad in the <i>Economist</i> inviting a jury of independent experts to scrutinize its claims. <br />
<br />
It's been almost three years, but the jury has finally <a href="http://stjury.ning.com/forum/topics/jury-announcement" target="_blank">delivered its verdict</a>. <br />
<br />
<div style="margin: 2px 10px 0px 5px; padding: 1px 5px 0px 10px; border-left: 3px solid #ddd; font-size: 95%;">The unanimous verdict of the Jury is that Steorn's attempts to demonstrate the claim have not shown the production of energy. The jury is therefore ceasing work.</div><br />
So the whole thing was a big waste of time. The mystery is why Steorn even bothered. What did they think they were gaining from this elaborate charade?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6498/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-06-30T18:45:51+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[In 1945 there was a fake death craze following Roosevelt&#8217;s death]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/in_1945_there_was_a_fake_death_craze_following_roosevelts_death/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/in_1945_there_was_a_fake_death_craze_following_roosevelts_death/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The fake celebrity death toll following Michael Jackson's death continues to rise. The body count so far:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.thetimes.co.za/Entertainment/CelebZone/Article.aspx?id=1026322" target="_blank">Rick Astley</a> (found dead in a Berlin hotel room), <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/27708/todays-fake-celebrity-death-comes-to-us-from-natalie-portman/" target="_blank">Natalie Portman</a> (fell off a cliff), <a href="http://george.clooney.mediafetcher.com/news/top_stories/actor_new_zealand.php" target="_blank">George Clooney</a> (fell off a cliff), P. Diddy, Jeff Goldblum (fell off a cliff), Harrison Ford, Miley Cyrus, Britney Spears, Ellen DeGeneres, Louie Anderson.<br />
<br />
The media is describing this death rumor craze as an internet phenomenon. Of course, the internet is the medium through which the rumors are circulating. However, such death rumor crazes are not unique to the internet. There have been similar crazes in the past. The only difference now is that, thanks to the internet, the rumors can spread faster, but also can be debunked faster. Consider this <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F10D17FD3A5B10728FDDAD0994DC405B8588F1D3">April 14, 1945</a> report from the New York Times, excerpted below:<br />
<br />
<div style="margin: 2px 10px 0px 5px; padding: 1px 5px 0px 10px; border-left: 3px solid #ddd; font-size: 95%;"><b>Flood of Rumors Gives City Jitters<br />
Legitimate and Ludicrous Calls Swamp the Switchboards in Wake of Roosevelt Death</b><br />
<br />
Widespread jitters bordering on mass hysteria seemed to sweep New York yesterday in the wake of Franklin D. Roosevelt's death, as rumors of killings, accidents and deaths involving prominent persons flooded the city.<br />
<br />
Newspapers, radio stations, government offices, banks and corner drugstores were deluged with thousands of telephone calls asking "is it true?" that such and such a person had been killed. The telephone calls in some cases followed patterns so closely that some harassed switchboard operators were convinced the wave was organized as a possible attempt to hamper communications. But the prevailing theory was that irresponsible and flighty persons had fallen prey to their own gullibility.<br />
<br />
The names of Van Johnson, film actor, and Comdr. Jack Dempsey were linked by the majority of callers, including two that Commander Dempsey and the actor had been killed together in an automobile accident. Other names mentioned were those of Mayor La Guardia, Harry Hopkins, Robert Taylor, Herbert H. Lehman, Charles Chaplin, Frank Sinatra, Al Jolson, Errol Flynn, Babe Ruth, Jack Benny and Jimmy Walker.</div><br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6497/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-06-30T16:17:58+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[More Celebrity Death Hoaxes]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/more_celebrity_death_hoaxes/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/more_celebrity_death_hoaxes/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[It's been the week of the celebrity death hoax, triggered by the real-life deaths of a string of celebrities (Ed McMahon, Farrah Fawcett, Michael Jackson, and Billy Mays).<br />
<br />
The recent celebrity death hoaxes have included: Jeff Goldblum, Harrison Ford, <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-12837-US-Headlines-Examiner%7Ey2009m6d26-Louie-Anderson-dead-and-other-Internet-hoaxes" target="_blank">Louie Anderson</a>, <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-us-twitpic-celebrity-hacking,0,1221478.story" target="_blank">Ellen DeGeneres</a>, <a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2009/06/29/236670/hacker-fakes-britney-spears-death.htm" target="_blank">Britney Spears</a>, and Miley Cyrus.<br />
<br />
In the case of Jeff Goldblum and Louie Anderson, the fake deaths were simply old rumors that were recycled. But in the case of Britney Spears, Ellen DeGeneres, and Miley Cyrus, pranksters hacked into their twitter accounts to post false death announcements.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6496/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-06-29T16:38:40+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Museum of Hoaxes on Twitter]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/museum_of_hoaxes_on_twitter/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/museum_of_hoaxes_on_twitter/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I recently created a <a href="https://twitter.com/HoaxMuseum" target="_blank">twitter page</a> for the Museum of Hoaxes, so if you're on twitter, check it out. <br />
<br />
I'm pretty inept at this social networking stuff. I created a personal twitter page months ago, but almost never posted to it. Hopefully I'll be more disciplined about tweeting on the MOH page.<br />
<br />
There may be a bit of a learning curve, because I still haven't figured out all the twitter lingo. RT is the only abbreviation I understand.<br />
<br />
But I'm excited that I already have nine "followers," and I hadn't even told anyone about the page yet.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6495/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-06-28T06:37:03+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Where is my pond?]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/where_is_my_pond/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/where_is_my_pond/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[At 9 a.m. George Terry Dinnie left his house to walk Buckley, his bouvier des Flandres. When he returned, an hour-and-a-half later, he discovered that his 2500 gallon pond had disappeared. He figures someone took it, though he doesn't know why or how someone removed that much water: "They pumped the water out faster than I can fill it up again. It's as weird as weird can be." Something fishy is going on. That's for sure. [<a href="http://www.mcall.com/news/local/police/all-5pondtheft.6938676jun24,0,4376070.story">morning call</a>]<br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6487/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-06-27T05:21:24+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Astrologer arrested for making prediction]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/astrologer_arrested_for_making_prediction/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/astrologer_arrested_for_making_prediction/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The Sri Lankan government recently arrested the astrologer Chandrasiri Bandara. Unfortunately, it wasn't because he was peddling pseudoscience, but because his predictions had political implications they didn't like. He had foreseen that a planetary change on October 8 would be inauspicious for the government, and that it wouldn't be able to contain rising living costs. [<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8120859.stm" target="_blank">BBC</a>]<br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6486/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-06-27T05:06:01+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Students hoax Paris Match]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/paris_match/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/paris_match/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A pair of French students attending Strasbourg university won first place in Paris Match's photoreporting competition, a prize that came with &#8364;5000. But upon receiving the prize, they revealed that all their photos had been staged. From the <a href="http://www.bjp-online.com/public/showPage.html?page=864044" target="_blank">British Journal of Photography</a>:<br />
 <br />
<div class="quot">Guillaume Chauvin and R&#233;mi Hubert won for a reportage chronicling the harsh difficulties some poor students encounter while studying at the Strasbourg university. Their images showed students living in basements or offering sex to pay their rents. Another image portrayed a young man falling asleep in a bus as he embarked on a two-hour commute to his university. The reportage can be seen on Paris Match's website here.<br />
<br />
The trick? All of the images had been faked, the two winners announced as they received the coveted prize on 24 June. &#8216;We though it was a bit caricatural,&#8217; says one of the students to Le Monde newspaper. &#8216;We thought it would never win.&#8217;</div><br />
Paris Match has now changed the rules of the competition to explicitly forbid fake reporting. You can see the photos <a href="http://paiement.parismatch.com/photoreportage2009/unalbum3.php?id=9&amp;ord=9" target="_blank">here</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6485/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-06-27T04:54:55+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Pranksters move Loch Ness signs]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/pranksters_move_loch_ness_signs/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/pranksters_move_loch_ness_signs/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Pranksters in Inverness have made it even more difficult to find Nessie by moving the road signs for Loch Ness so that they point in the wrong direction. The leading suspects are concert-goers attending the RockNess music festival.<br />
<br />
But here's the part of the article I found interesting. One resident "likened the alterations to World War II, when the authorities removed signs to prevent German soldiers from navigating their way round the country if they invaded."<br />
<br />
I didn't know that had been done during WWII. I can't imagine that a lack of road signs would have significantly slowed down a German invasion. [<a href="http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/Article.aspx/1278165?UserKey=" target="_blank">Press and Journal</a>]<br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6484/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-06-26T06:34:54+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>