<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>The Museum of Hoaxes</title>
    <link>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com</link>
    <description>Examining dubious claims and mischief of all kinds.</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>alex@museumofhoaxes.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009 Alex Boese</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-11-06T22:07:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Cabbage Stump Night]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/cabbage_stump_night/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/cabbage_stump_night/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Cabbage Stump Night (or merely Cabbage Night) appears to be an American variant of northern England's <a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6628/">Mischief Night</a>, celebrated on the night before Halloween. Once again, it's something I had never heard of before. <a href="http://www.newburyportnews.com/puopinion/local_story_309234509.html?keyword=secondarystory" target="_blank">From newburyportnews.com</a>:<br />
<br />
<div style="margin: 2px 10px 0px 5px; padding: 1px 5px 0px 10px; border-left: 3px solid #ddd; font-size: 95%;">Cabbage Stump Nights are not well chronicled. New Jersey apparently had its "cabbage night'' when cabbages were hurled at houses, but ours bettered that because cabbages do not fit small hands for throwing...<br />
Cabbages have a distinctive and proper root for Cabbage Stump Night because it is the rubbery equivalent of a Little League baseball bat &#8212; pliant, easy to grasp and packing a mighty wallop.<br />
Proper celebration of Cabbage Stump Night was to make a stealthy advance upon a peaceful household, beat the bejabbers out of the side of the house or the front door and skedaddle as fast as you could in the getaway. The alternative to escape was to receive a belt in the behind from the householder.<br />
There would be no damage to the house because of the softness of the root, but the racket inside the house was a shock wave.</div><br />
There's a few more details about it in the <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=MdENdlKWZ8AC&pg=RA1-PA499&lpg=RA1-PA499&dq=%22cabbage+stump+night%22&source=bl&ots=J3M7KqnH8H&sig=3vDjoknLP_a83OA0hU3SiCLnFLk&hl=en&ei=35z0SoTxLpK4Nvn-_OgF&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CAsQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22cabbage%20stump%20night%22&f=false">Dictionary of American Regional English</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6642/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-06T23:07:49+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Snake in drain was a hoax]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/snake_in_drain_was_a_hoax/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/snake_in_drain_was_a_hoax/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<div class="quot">A man who caught a 14-foot &#40;4.2-meter&#41; python in a Florida drain pipe was charged with perpetrating a hoax after wildlife officers discovered he owned the snake and put it in the pipe in order to stage the capture. Justin Matthews, a professional animal trapper, later admitted that he had "staged the event to call attention to a growing problem of irresponsible pet ownership," the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission said on Thursday.</div><br />
Link: <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20091105/od_nm/us_python_odd">Yahoo! News</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6641/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-06T22:56:10+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Lee Harvey Oswald&#8217;s &#8216;Backyard Photo&#8217;: Not A Fake!]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/lee_harvey_oswalds_backyard_photo_not_a_fake/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/lee_harvey_oswalds_backyard_photo_not_a_fake/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.museumofhoaxes.com/1964oslife_thumb.jpg" alt="" align="right" style="margin:0px 0px 5px 5px;">Photo-fakery expert Hany Farid has confirmed, after a two-month analysis, that the famous photo of Lee Harvey Oswald posing in his backyard with a rifle was not a fake. <a href="http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Dartmouth+expert%3A+Oswald+photo+appears+real&amp;articleId=80e02a8b-f56a-4156-8a00-9e9be6e91f44" target="_blank">From unionleader.com</a>:<br />
<br />
<div style="margin: 2px 10px 0px 5px; padding: 1px 5px 0px 10px; border-left: 3px solid #ddd; font-size: 95%;">Farid said over the years, he's received dozens and dozens of requests to analyze the photo. What helped him decide to take on the project was a recent study he worked on looking at how the human brain processes images.<br />
He used a computer program Facegen, to build a virtual 3D model of Oswald's head. Once that was completed, he added in the background features of the photo. Through a series of computations, he figured out where the camera had to be, the trajectory of the sun and where Oswald was in relation to the camera...<br />
Farid said given the technology available 46 years ago, there is no way someone would have been able to get the internal and external elements of the photo just right in order to fabricate not only the one photo, but two others in the series.</div><br />
I have a blurb about the <a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/photo_database/image/oswalds_backyard_photo/" target="_blank">"backyard photo"</a> in the hoax photo archive. As far as I know, there was no longer any real controversy about the authenticity of the photo, except among a handful of conspiracy theorists. But what helped start the controversy, back in 1964, was that when magazines published the image, they retouched it in various ways. As a result, there were a number of versions of the image in circulation, with differing details, and this created suspicions.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6640/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-06T22:47:37+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Fake Wilson Campaign Ad]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/fake_wilson_campaign_ad/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/fake_wilson_campaign_ad/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This sounds like it might be a case of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_propaganda">"black propaganda"</a>:<br />
<br />
<div style="margin: 2px 10px 0px 5px; padding: 1px 5px 0px 10px; border-left: 3px solid #ddd; font-size: 95%;">Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.) on Thursday condemned a fake campaign ad circulating under his name that implies President Barack Obama is a communist...<br />
The 30-second ad begins with a clip of President Barack Obama's speech to students on the first day of school this year. Red-colored text scrolls across the screen that says "Community Activist," a message that morphs into "Communist Activity."<br />
The image then changes from Obama to clips of Red Army parades featuring infantrymen, tanks, and rockets...<br />
<br />
The end of the ad contains Wilson's campaign logo and says "paid for by Joe Wilson for Congress."</div><br />
Link: <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/twitter-room/other-news/66567-wilson-condemns-fake-campaign-ad-">thehill.com</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6639/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-06T21:15:20+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Rescue Dummy, Get Robbed]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/rescue_dummy_get_robbed/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/rescue_dummy_get_robbed/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[What you get for trying to be a hero nowadays:<br />
<br />
<div class="quot">A man was attacked and robbed after he jumped into a lake believing a boy was drowning, only to find it was a dummy.<br />
The dog walker was approached by a "distressed" couple in Foxes Forest, Portsmouth, who said their son had been attacked by a swan in nearby water.<br />
When the 48-year-old jumped into the lake and discovered the dummy he saw the man going through his coat pockets.</div> <br />
Link: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/hampshire/8343470.stm">BBC</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6638/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-06T19:01:07+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[A fork in the road, literally]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/a_fork_in_the_road_literally/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/a_fork_in_the_road_literally/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://hoaxblog.s3.amazonaws.com/forkinroad.jpg" alt="" align="right" style="margin:0px 0px 5px 5px;">A few days ago a fork appeared in the middle of a Pasadena road. It's located, appropriately, at a fork in the road, where Pasadena and St. John avenues divide. From the <a href="http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/ci_13705662" target="_blank">Pasadena Star News</a>:<br />
<br />
<div style="margin: 2px 10px 0px 5px; padding: 1px 5px 0px 10px; border-left: 3px solid #ddd; font-size: 95%;">It turns out the fork is an elaborate - and expensive - birthday prank in honor of the 75th birthday of Bob Stane, founder of the Ice House comedy club, who now owns the Coffee Gallery Backstage in Altadena...<br />
The wooden fork, is "expertly carved and painted," to look like metal, Stane said. "It's anchored in 2 1/2-feet of concrete and steel. It's not a public danger - unless someone drives into it."</div><br />
<i>(Thanks, Bob!)</i><br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6637/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-06T18:48:43+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[The Case of the Carbolic Smoke Ball]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/the_case_of_the_carbolic_smoke_ball/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/the_case_of_the_carbolic_smoke_ball/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://hoaxblog.s3.amazonaws.com/carbolic.jpg" alt="" align="right" style="margin:0px 0px 5px 5px;">Clive Coleman tells the story for <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8340276.stm" target="_blank">BBC Radio 4</a> of the Carbolic Smoke Ball Company. It was an 1892 case of fraudulent advertising. The case against them is "seen by some as the birth of modern consumer protection":<br />
<br />
<div style="margin: 2px 10px 0px 5px; padding: 1px 5px 0px 10px; border-left: 3px solid #ddd; font-size: 95%;">The carbolic smoke ball was a peculiar device marketed as a cure for various ailments including influenza. It consisted of a rubber ball, filled with powdered carbolic acid. You squeezed the ball sending a puff of acidic smoke right up a tube inserted into your nose. The idea was that your nose would run and the cold would be flushed out.<br />
The company making the ball advertised it in the Pall Mall Gazette offering a &#163;100 reward to anyone using it correctly who then contracted influenza. They deposited &#163;1,000 in the Alliance Bank in Regent Street to show the money was there. </div><br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6636/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-06T18:40:55+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[io9.com accuses The Fourth Kind of being an unsuccessful hoax]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/io9.com_accuses_the_fourth_kind_of_being_an_unsuccessful_hoax/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/io9.com_accuses_the_fourth_kind_of_being_an_unsuccessful_hoax/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The new movie <a href="http://www.thefourthkind.net/"><i>The Fourth Kind</i></a> tries to blur reality in the same way that movies such as <i>Paranormal Activity</i> and <i>The Blair Witch Project</i> have successfully done. But <a href="http://io9.com/5397359/the-fourth-kind-is-a-hoax" target="_blank">according to io9.com</a>, <i>The Fourth Kind</i> doesn't manage to pull it off convincingly:<br />
<br />
<div style="margin: 2px 10px 0px 5px; padding: 1px 5px 0px 10px; border-left: 3px solid #ddd; font-size: 95%;">Alien abduction flick <i>The Fourth Kind</i> bills itself as containing "actual footage" from case histories. But this footage is so poorly faked that it insults the audience's intelligence...<br />
The movie stumbled out of the gate by hanging most of its fear power on a fundamental dishonesty. There is no "archival footage." There are no "actual case studies." Instead, we get badly-acted, blatantly fake documentary footage which fuzzes out whenever anything alien happens...<br />
I'm not against fake documentaries. I loved <i>Paranormal Activity</i>, which was effective because the actors seemed so effortlessly real. Nothing felt stagey or artificial about that movie's "documentary" evidence.<br />
What pushes <i>Fourth Kind</i> from the merely bad into the actually insulting was the filmmakers' insistence that the documentary evidence was real. Actors from the "documentary" portions of the movie are uncredited, and many media outlets are still reporting that the footage is real.</div><br />
I'll probably see it anyway (on dvd). My standards for horror movies are pretty low. <br />
<br />
<i>(Thanks, Joe!)</i><br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6635/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-06T01:25:38+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Save On All Jackets!]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/save_on_all_jackets/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/save_on_all_jackets/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Random banner ad. (via <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/a19wt/save_on_all_jackets/" target="_blank">Reddit</a>)<br />
<br />
<img src="http://bloghoax.s3.amazonaws.com/saveonjackets.jpg" alt=""><br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6634/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-06T01:08:19+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Psycho-Acoustic Beatles Simulations]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/psycho-acoustic_beatles_simulations/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/psycho-acoustic_beatles_simulations/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[BlueBeat music is being sued for illegally selling Beatles songs. Their defense: the songs are not Beatles songs, but rather "psycho-acoustic simulations."<br />
<br />
<div style="margin: 2px 10px 0px 5px; padding: 1px 5px 0px 10px; border-left: 3px solid #ddd; font-size: 95%;">BlueBeat's lawyers claim that the Website is "entirely lawful and does not constitute piracy" and that the plaintiffs are not likely to succeed. Also, the plaintiffs are well aware that the defendants "developed a series of entirely new and original sounds that it allows the general public to purchase" and that "copyright protection does not extend to the independant fixation of sounds other than those contained in their copyrighted recordings."</div><br />
Link: <a href="http://consumerist.com/5398146/company-sued-for-selling-beatles-mp3s-says-theyre-original-works-so-its-okay" target="_blank">consumerist.com</a><br />
<br />
<i>(Thanks, Joe!)</i><br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6633/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-06T01:04:34+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Viagra Corporate Headquarters]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/viagra_corporate_headquarters/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/viagra_corporate_headquarters/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Irena wrote to ask whether this photo was genuine.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://bloghoax.s3.amazonaws.com/viagracorp.jpg" alt=""><br />
<br />
I assume the title is a joke. (It isn't really the corporate headquarters of Viagra.) I'm also pretty sure the photo has been doctored, since some of those phallic bushes appear to be growing out of concrete.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6632/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-06T00:39:11+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Divining Rods for Bombs]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/divining_rods_for_bombs/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/divining_rods_for_bombs/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 2px 10px 0px 5px; padding: 1px 5px 0px 10px; border-left: 3px solid #ddd; font-size: 95%;">Despite major bombings that have rattled the nation, and fears of rising violence as American troops withdraw, Iraq&#8217;s security forces have been relying on a device to detect bombs and weapons that the United States military and technical experts say is useless.<br />
The small hand-held wand, with a telescopic antenna on a swivel, is being used at hundreds of checkpoints in Iraq. But the device works &#8220;on the same principle as a Ouija board&#8221; &#8212; the power of suggestion &#8212; said a retired United States Air Force officer, Lt. Col. Hal Bidlack, who described the wand as nothing more than an explosives divining rod. Still, the Iraqi government has purchased more than 1,500 of the devices, known as the ADE 651, at costs from $16,500 to $60,000 each.</div> Link: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/world/middleeast/04sensors.html?_r=2&amp;hp" target="_blank">NY Times</a><br />
<br />
The high price is probably part of the marketing psychology that helps sell these things. Buyers figure that, at that price, they <i>must</i> work.<br />
<i>(Thanks, Bob!)</i><br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6631/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-05T07:02:28+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Mr. Man on the Street Strikes Again]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/mr._man_on_the_street_strikes_again/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/mr._man_on_the_street_strikes_again/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I wrote about Greg Packer, aka the phony Man on the Street, in <i>Hippo Eats Dwarf</i>:<br />
<br />
<div style="margin: 2px 10px 0px 5px; padding: 1px 5px 0px 10px; border-left: 3px solid #ddd; font-size: 95%;">In 2003, media critics noticed that the same man kept popping up time after time in &#8220;man on the street&#8221; interviews. Greg Packer, a highway maintenance worker from upstate New York, was quoted by The New York Times, the New York Daily News, the Los Angeles Times, the New York Post, the Philadelphia Inquirer, the London Times, and other publications. He also appeared on CNN, MSNBC, and Fox. But he was always described as nobody special, just a random person.</div> <br />
Apparently Packer is still going strong. The <a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/attytood/Philly_media_punked_yet_again_by_phony_NY_man_on_street.html" target="_blank">Philadelphia Daily News</a> admits that they were the latest paper to fall for his act.<br />
<i>(Thanks, Bob!)</i><br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6630/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-05T06:47:54+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Reverse Counterfeiting: The Case of the Gold Penny]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/reverse_counterfeiting_the_case_of_the_gold_penny/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/reverse_counterfeiting_the_case_of_the_gold_penny/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 2px 10px 0px 5px; padding: 1px 5px 0px 10px; border-left: 3px solid #ddd; font-size: 95%;">Most counterfeiting takes something that is nearly worthless and turns it into something perceived to have value. Mr. Daws did just the opposite. He took value &#8212; approximately $100 worth of gold &#8212; and turned it into something perceived as nearly worthless, one cent. &#8220;It&#8217;s there, but if people don&#8217;t realize it, it&#8217;s the same as not being there,&#8221; he said. Of the 11 copper-plated gold pennies he made as part of his series, only this one was sent into the wider world...<br />
<br />
Late this summer, when Ms. Reed was paying for groceries at the C-Town supermarket in Greenpoint, she noticed the penny because the gold color had started to peek through. </div>Link: <a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/maker-learns-the-fate-of-a-penny-made-of-gold/" target="_blank">NY Times</a><br />
<br />
I'm going to start checking any pennies I get more closely!<br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6629/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-05T06:34:44+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Mischief Night]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/mischief_night/]]></link>
      <guid>http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/mischief_night/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I'd never heard of Mischief Night before, but then it seems to be local to northern England. <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8339617.stm">From the BBC</a>:<br />
<br />
<div style="margin: 2px 10px 0px 5px; padding: 1px 5px 0px 10px; border-left: 3px solid #ddd; font-size: 95%;">Depending on where you live, it lands sometime around Halloween and Bonfire Night. And opinions vary on whether it is a chance for harmless fun or an excuse for anti-social behaviour.<br />
Like many native traditions, its exact origins are unknown, but Mischief Night is thought to date from the 1700s when a custom of Lawless Hours or Days prevailed in Britain...<br />
Since the 1950s, Mischief Night appears to have died out in all areas of the UK except northern England, and it is not at all clear why.<br />
What is known is that it was exported to the United States, and recently re-imported as trick or treat, now popular across the UK.</div><br /><br /><a href="http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/6628/">Comments</a>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-04T00:43:50+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>