Recent Forum Posts
| • | Purple Squirrel 02/08/2012 |
| • | Mutant Nuclear Spider? 02/06/2012 |
| • | The Glorious Deception 02/04/2012 |
| • | Prank by Vermont inmates adorns decals 02/03/2012 |
| • | Rolling Stone article - One town's war on g a y teens 02/03/2012 |
| • | Russian Drill Nears 14-Million-Year-Old Antarctic Lake 02/02/2012 |
| • | Don't wash your jeans? 02/02/2012 |
| • | ****** Microsoft 02/02/2012 |
| • | Dutch mentally handicapped children loose their savings in bankruptcy scandal 02/01/2012 |
| • | 31 january 1961: Ham the first Mercury astronaut 01/31/2012 |
Site Map
Blog Categories
Animals |
Crop Circles |
Advertising |
April Fools Day |
Art |
Birth/Babies |
Body Manipulation |
Business/Finance |
Celebrities |
Con Artists |
Conspiracy Theories |
Cryptozoology |
Nessie |
Death |
eBay |
Email Hoaxes |
Entertainment |
Exploration/Travel |
Extraterrestrial Life |
Food |
Free Energy |
Future/Time |
Gross |
Hate Crimes/Terror |
History |
Identity/Imposters |
Technology |
Journalism |
Law/Police/Crime |
Literature/Language |
Mass Delusion |
Health/Medicine |
Military |
Miscellaneous |
Photos/Videos |
Places |
Politics |
Pranks |
Psychology |
Radio |
Religion |
Science |
Sex/Romance |
Sports |
Paranormal |
Tall Tales |
Websites |
Fashion |
Gnomes |
Urban Legends |
Music |
Pareidolia |
Scams |
Bad Excuses |
Products |
Books |
Pseudoscience |
Social Networking Sites |
Videos |
Education |
Magic |
Celebrations
Blog Archives
January, 2012 |
December, 2011 |
November, 2011 |
October, 2011 |
September, 2011 |
August, 2011 |
November, 2010 |
April, 2010 |
January, 2010 |
December, 2009 |
November, 2009 |
October, 2009 |
September, 2009 |
August, 2009 |
July, 2009 |
June, 2009 |
May, 2009 |
April, 2009 |
March, 2009 |
February, 2009 |
January, 2009 |
December, 2008 |
November, 2008 |
October, 2008 |
September, 2008 |
August, 2008 |
July, 2008 |
June, 2008 |
May, 2008 |
April, 2008 |
March, 2008 |
February, 2008 |
January, 2008 |
December, 2007 |
November, 2007 |
October, 2007 |
September, 2007 |
August, 2007 |
July, 2007 |
June, 2007 |
May, 2007 |
April, 2007 |
March, 2007 |
February, 2007 |
January, 2007 |
December, 2006 |
November, 2006 |
October, 2006 |
September, 2006 |
August, 2006 |
July, 2006 |
June, 2006 |
May, 2006 |
April, 2006 |
March, 2006 |
February, 2006 |
January, 2006 |
December, 2005 |
November, 2005 |
October, 2005 |
September, 2005 |
August, 2005 |
July, 2005 |
June, 2005 |
May, 2005 |
April, 2005 |
March, 2005 |
February, 2005 |
January, 2005 |
December, 2004 |
November, 2004 |
October, 2004 |
September, 2004 |
August, 2004 |
July, 2004 |
June, 2004 |
May, 2004 |
April, 2004 |
March, 2004 |
February, 2004 |
January, 2004 |
December, 2003 |
November, 2003 |
October, 2003 |
September, 2003 |
August, 2003 |
July, 2003 |
June, 2003 |
May, 2003 |
January, 2003 |
November, 2002 |
October, 2002 |
September, 2002 |
August, 2002 |
July, 2002 |
Watson’s Living Curiosities
Status: Real
This poster for "S. Watson's American Museum of Living Curiosities", which dates from 1885, can be found at the British Library site. All the exhibits seem like pretty standard stuff for a 19th-century museum: the stoutest lady in the world, the two-headed marvel, snake charmer, etc. It's the "Australians" exhibit that puzzles me. They don't really look like Australians. Are those outfits something that Aussies often wear?
|
Categories: Advertising Posted by Alex on Tue Feb 19, 2008 |
Comments (9) |
I wouldn't say we dress like that often...
In fact, I don't believe stokings and dresses for blokes were ever really big here.
Posted by Scriitor on Wed Feb 20, 2008 at 01:14 AM
In fact, I don't believe stokings and dresses for blokes were ever really big here.
Nope, nothing I've ever worn either. Considering it's from 1885 I'd have guessed if they were exhibiting 'Australians' it would have been some of the indigenous population. Or a platypus.
Posted by Nettie in Perth, Western Australia on Wed Feb 20, 2008 at 01:22 AM
The costumes look like Alpine peasant costumes. Surely it's not an erroneous insertion of a picture of Austrians?!?
On the other hand, maybe it's their dull eyes and prognathous, low-browed visages that mark them as Australians - our antipodean colonials were (then as now) the regrettable products of rampant inbreeding between uncouth convicts.
Posted by outeast on Wed Feb 20, 2008 at 02:46 AM
On the other hand, maybe it's their dull eyes and prognathous, low-browed visages that mark them as Australians - our antipodean colonials were (then as now) the regrettable products of rampant inbreeding between uncouth convicts.
Australia was far enough away and hard enough to reach in those days that it was an exotic label for oddities. After all, few of the visitors to such shows would ever go to Australia to check out the accuracy.
They appear to be the usual "pinheads" (microcephalics) touted as sometimes touted as Aztecs (another exotic place most folks wouldn't be able to visit themselves).
I believe it's just advertising puff, using a faraway land to hint at something wild or exotic.
Posted by Sarah (Messybeast) on Wed Feb 20, 2008 at 04:03 AM
They appear to be the usual "pinheads" (microcephalics) touted as sometimes touted as Aztecs (another exotic place most folks wouldn't be able to visit themselves).
I believe it's just advertising puff, using a faraway land to hint at something wild or exotic.
Australians have always been a curiostity to me. Where is this show going to be? :D
Posted by Dan Sz. in MI on Wed Feb 20, 2008 at 10:07 AM
>>I wouldn't say we dress like that often... In fact, I don't believe stokings and dresses for blokes were ever really big here.<<
Pity. I had a great image in my head of a bunch of Australians gathered around a barbecue dressed like this.
Posted by Alex in San Diego on Wed Feb 20, 2008 at 10:09 AM
Pity. I had a great image in my head of a bunch of Australians gathered around a barbecue dressed like this.
Sarah's right. They're pinheads from the picture, and it was common practice to label a particular type of 'freak' (forgive the term but in the context it's the best) as being from some far-flung place.
As if they ALL looked like that. In terms of costume, it's possible that the guys who were calling them 'Australians' hadn't got a clue what Aussies (or, possibly, Aboriginies which may be what they were getting at. Exotic civilisations and all that) and just dressed them as Austrians.
Posted by Renquist in Glasgow, Scotland on Wed Feb 20, 2008 at 11:03 AM
As if they ALL looked like that. In terms of costume, it's possible that the guys who were calling them 'Australians' hadn't got a clue what Aussies (or, possibly, Aboriginies which may be what they were getting at. Exotic civilisations and all that) and just dressed them as Austrians.
Sarah and Renquist are probably right (although I have to say that - costumes aside - most of the Australians I've known have looked pretty much like that).
Posted by outeast on Wed Feb 20, 2008 at 11:05 AM
What a lot of great stuff the British Library has got up its figurative sleeve!
I reckon that 'Australians' were such an exotic concept in 1851 that the poster artist just made something up.
Heaven knows how they would depict Canadians (my neck of the woods being Canada)!
Posted by Laura in The Virtual Dime Museum on Mon Mar 17, 2008 at 11:35 AM
I reckon that 'Australians' were such an exotic concept in 1851 that the poster artist just made something up.
Heaven knows how they would depict Canadians (my neck of the woods being Canada)!
Comments: Page 1 of 1 pages