The Museum of Hoaxes
hoax archive hoax archive hoax archive hoax archive hoax archive
 
Life discovered on the moon, 1835
The Cottingley Fairies, 1917
September Morn, the painting that shocked the censor, 1913
The Cradle of the Deep, a literary hoax, 1929
The Lovely Feejee Mermaid, 1842
The Olympic Underwear Relay, 1956
Burger King's Left-Handed Whopper Hoax, 1998
The damp spot that hoaxed a city, 1912
Snowball the Monster Cat, 2000
Jean Gauntt, the Immortal Baby, 1939
Terrorist Catch and Release
This image has been floating around the internet for at least two years. It usually is accompanied by the caption: "In 2003 the US Navy initiates its new 'Terrorist Catch and Release Program.'" Obviously the caption is a joke, and I'm guessing that the car has been photoshopped in. But what would the crowd be standing there for? Would it be safe for them to stand there as a plane was taking off?
image
Categories: Military, Photos/Videos
Posted by The Curator on Wed Mar 30, 2005
Comments (49)
its off a bbc (british) tv show called top gear, they launched a car off the ship to "kill off" their test driver "stig"
check it out at http://www.topgear.com

p.s bloody good tv show
Posted by paul  in  new zealand  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  01:22 AM
So the car really was being hurled off the ship, and there was actually a person in the car?
Posted by The Curator  in  San Diego  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  01:27 AM
To quote Fredy Krueger:

"Ooo, what a rush!"
Posted by Rod  in  the land of smarties.  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  01:33 AM
I've seen a few of those Top Gear shows. One I saw had a huge semi crash into a little hatchback supposedly driven by one of the presenters. After the crash they informed the audience that the car was remote controlled with a dummy at the wheel. Probably same thing here.
Posted by Smerk  in  to mischief  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  01:36 AM
Oops. I think I may have meant the other car show - 5th Gear. Still, same result in the end. tongue rolleye
Posted by Smerk  in  to mischief  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  01:52 AM
when top gear did it, it was to see if an elderly, race-prepared Jaguar could out-accelerate a jet plane (i forget the outcome). the gag was that the 'stig'- the mysterious helmeted driver- wasnt able to stop in time and shot off the end of the aircraft carrier. however if you look carefully at the shot of the car actually flying off the deck, you can see the plume of smoke from where it was fired off by the car-cannon used in james bond films, starsky and hutch etc.
Posted by Nick  in  Merrie Olde Englande  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  03:57 AM
Don't forget that jets are accelerated off the deck by a sort of horizontal catapult system -- they don't take off on their own as they would if they had a lot of runway.
Posted by cvirtue  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  07:27 AM
If this picture is from a tv show, where are the tv cameras?
Posted by Rod  in  the land of smarties.  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  07:58 AM
I assumed they meant it was a still taken from the show; y'know, so that the cameras would be where the shot was taken from.
Ok, now I'm confusing myself.
Posted by Boo  in  The Land of the Haggii...  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  08:07 AM
This is actually a snapshot of a test in progress. Before the Navy commissions a new aircraft carrier, they run the cats through a set of tests to see how strong they are. They start with a very basic box on wheels, and gradually move their way up to something weighing what a jet would.

They do, in some cases, shoot a car off the deck.
Posted by Barry  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  09:29 AM
Back in the early 90's a French auto company ran an ad for one of their new vehicles. It was a humourous advertisement, (in french, if I recall correctly) that showed a racecar driver gearing up for a vehicle road test, and then, after appropriate build-up, being launched off the air-craft carrier deck with a satisfying scream of terror. Does this shot come from that advertisement? (When I saw the ad on a T.V. program about foreign ad campaigns I nearly laughed myself sick...)
Posted by Jeremy Osborn  in  Vancouver, Canada  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  10:30 AM
The BBC 'Top Gear' programme shot the car off the stern of HMS Invincible.
The carrier in the picture is a lot larger than Invincible, and also appears to be using a steam catapult, which Invincible doesn't have.
Posted by Howard  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  11:00 AM
Nick, catapults on aircraft carriers are steam powered. That is the reason for the 'plume of smoke'.
Posted by Captain Al  in  Vancouver Island, Canada  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  11:28 AM
>> They do, in some cases, shoot a car off the deck.

The navy does not just throw cars into the sea, regardless of what you claim they do for tests. It's too environmentally harmful.

When I was in the Army, we dropped some old tanks into the sea off the East Coast to help with reefs. The engines were removed, along with any moving parts, and thoroughly cleaned of oil and fluids to make then environmentally safe. The doors were welded open and they were sandblasted to remove paint, another possible danger to the environment.
Posted by Bill B.  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  11:36 AM
The ship in the photo is the USS Enterprise (CVN-65). The ship certainly isn't a British carrier as evidenced by the lack of a "ski jump" ramp on the bow. CAPT Al is completely right that the catapults on aircraft carriers are steam driven, hence the "smoke" plume.

I served on the USS Constellation from 92-96, and had heard stories about shooting non-flying objects, like cars, off the pointy end, but had never witnessed it.

I would say, however, that if it were done, the picture would look just like this. The crowd would be watching from behind the catapult, there would be no one to the sides, there would be no other aircraft on the flight deck, etc.

The Enterprise has been in service since 1961. This looks like an older picture and the car looks like it's 60s-70s vintage (Dodge Dart?). I think that this is likely legit.
Posted by Rob B.  in  Washington, DC  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  01:45 PM
Bill B.

It's very sweet that you think that a government entity such as the armed forces would never do anything environmentally harmful. It provides so much hope for the future. But just like the cruise lines that dump their garbage into the sea on a regular basis, all others at sea do what they want. I served on the U.S.S. Enterprise (CVN-65) from 1988 to 1992 as an AG2. My job was weather observer for the station meteorologist. Our workstation was directly above the air traffic controllers in the tower. No one worked higher than us on that ship except the pilots, we had a 360 degree view, and NOTHING left the deck without first being briefed by our department.

Tests were often conducted, like EVERY time a cat was ever serviced. YES, they came to us for a weather briefing before launching even a non-flying test.

If stray items sometimes made it on board to "help" in the testing of the cats it wouldn't be the first time. It was never officially OK'd by anyone but no one really cared. It was fun stuff to watch... personally, I saw only one vehicle go off the catapults. A VW bug van... and any crew who could was gathered on deck to watch. The air boss however didn't... so you might not find it in any operation manuals but stupid shit does take place.

What do you expect out of that many guys in one small place, bored, and with the most bad-ass toys in human history?
Posted by Mark-N-Isa  in  Midwest USA  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  02:12 PM
The Army took the care it did BECAUSE it was providing a "reef" for things to live on... and that event was provided with "publicity" which can make anyone VERY conscious. However, not everything is done in the publics' scrutinizing eyes. The Navy has indeed "just shot a vehicle into the ocean." I witnessed it. It was drained of fluids, before it was brought on board in Hawaii... but that's all the preventative care taken with it. And I guarantee, it's at the bottom, and always will be.
Posted by Mark-N-Isa  in  Midwest USA  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  02:22 PM
No guys, I'm pretty sure thats from top gear. thats almost definitely the white jaguar he was driving in that episode. Also, they nitro charged the car which would explain the plume of smoke left behind (if I'm not mistaken)
Posted by djg  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  05:40 PM
I guess I'm the only person in the world who doesn't get the joke.
What does any of this have to do with catching and releasing terrorists?
Posted by Big Gary C  in  Dallas, Texas  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  07:15 PM
See, Gary. What if you got asked that question on Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? Then you'd like pretty silly asking the audience. tongue wink
Posted by The Curator  in  San Diego  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  07:26 PM
I can accept that the military hasn't always been environmentally responsible. I said they don't do it now. You made it sound like it was officially sanctioned testing and common in the first. You backtracked heavily from that in the second.

>>It was never officially OK'd by anyone but no one really cared.

That some idiots would do it just to do it I believe. That the navy routinely or even occassionally sends a car off the end to test the system, I don't. I'm also not convinced this is a nitro-charged jaguar, but I'm not a car expert.
Posted by Bill B.  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  10:15 PM
As far as being "sweet" thinking, I only believe that there's at least one, perhaps even two, people in the Navy who would realize that doing this as a routine test would be an open invitation to negative publicity when an environmental group learned of it.
Posted by Bill B.  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  10:21 PM
That ain't no Jaguar, no curves, looks like a Chevy Impala, Ford Falcon or some such American Box style car.
Posted by martinelli  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  11:17 PM
My guess would be a '64 Ford Futura, a '65 Chevy Belair, or a '66 Rambler classic. I am thankful that it is not my Chariot of Fire. She will be mine again, this I swear
Posted by Raoul  on  Wed Mar 30, 2005  at  11:44 PM
I also served in the navy for a number of years, including a tour on a new aircraft carrier through the construction and testing phase, and am going to join in with the others who have already stated that the navy does test the catapult launching system by using a series of increasing weights (which can then be recoved from the water afterwards for reuse). Although it's unlikely anyone would do it again, in years past when the world was a less environmentally-aware place they did sometimes use other objects as well, including a couple of cars.
Posted by Thaddeus  on  Thu Mar 31, 2005  at  08:28 PM
The photo is from the USS Enterprise - you can tell by the big number on the front of the flight deck. I retired from the navy, and have heard several 'sea stories' about shooting cars off the the flight deck. According to the story, somebody had a car they wanted to get rid of, rather than junk it, they decided to launch it and made an event out of it - hence the audience If you look at the photo, it appears to be an old car, giving the "junker" story some creedence.
This may be frowned upon in today's navy, but from the look of the car, the incident happened several years ago. This could very be a real event.
Posted by Kevin Fraser  on  Thu Mar 31, 2005  at  09:20 PM
Yes, it's the Enterprise, Earth-bound version.

Pic One

Pic Two

Pic Three

These links all came from here , and if you look, you could probably nail down the year it was taken by checking the number size painted on the foredeck, etc.
Posted by Rod  in  the land of smarties.  on  Thu Mar 31, 2005  at  09:52 PM
If you trying out a catapult after repairing it, what would be your first choice to test it with? An old car or a $30 million fighter plane?
Posted by Captain Al  in  Vancouver Island, Canada  on  Fri Apr 01, 2005  at  07:28 PM
Umm, actually probably a gopher.
Or maybe the next person who tries to convince me that eating a burger is wrong.
smile

Or maybe, in keeping with the name, a cat?

smirk

Wow, I can feel the hatred already, and I haven't even pressed 'Submit' yet.
Posted by Rod  in  the land of smarties.  on  Fri Apr 01, 2005  at  09:48 PM
the carrier in the picture is the USS-Enterprise.
Its NOT the same event as the BBC's film of a Jaguar XJ-S going over the bow ramp of HMS Invincible.
You can see that film on the BBC website at
http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/downloads/
Invincible has a ramp, no catapults, a pointed bow, and the deck does not flare out on the right (as shown in the picture). The ship in the picture has a square bow, two catapults, and the giveaway - Enterprise's pennant number - 65 - painted on the deck
Finally I know little about USA cars, so I've no idea what it is, but thats not a Jaguar in the shot!!!
Dendike
Posted by demdike  on  Sun Apr 03, 2005  at  06:39 PM
Comments: Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 
Commenting is no longer available for this post.
All text Copyright © 2014 by Alex Boese, except where otherwise indicated. All rights reserved.