Get MOH Blog Posts by Email
![]() | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Site Map
Blog Categories
Advertising |
Animals |
April Fools Day |
Art |
Bad Excuses |
Birth/Babies |
Body Manipulation |
Books |
Business/Finance |
Celebrations |
Celebrities |
Con Artists |
Conspiracy Theories |
Crop Circles |
Cryptozoology |
Nessie |
Death |
eBay |
Education |
Email Hoaxes |
Entertainment |
Exploration/Travel |
Extraterrestrial Life |
Fashion |
Folklore/Tall Tales |
Food |
Free Energy |
Future/Time |
Gnomes |
Gross |
Hate Crimes/Terror |
Health/Medicine |
History |
Identity/Imposters |
Journalism |
Law/Police/Crime |
Literature/Language |
Magic |
Mass Delusion |
Military |
Miscellaneous |
Music |
Paranormal |
Pareidolia |
Photos/Videos |
Places |
Politics |
Pranks |
Products |
Pseudoscience |
Psychology |
Radio |
Religion |
Scams |
Science |
Sex/Romance |
Social Networking Sites |
Sports |
Technology |
Urban Legends |
Videos |
Websites
Blog Archives
May, 2013 |
April, 2013 |
March, 2013 |
February, 2013 |
January, 2013 |
October, 2012 |
September, 2012 |
August, 2012 |
July, 2012 |
June, 2012 |
May, 2012 |
April, 2012 |
March, 2012 |
February, 2012 |
January, 2012 |
December, 2011 |
November, 2011 |
October, 2011 |
September, 2011 |
August, 2011 |
November, 2010 |
April, 2010 |
January, 2010 |
December, 2009 |
November, 2009 |
October, 2009 |
September, 2009 |
August, 2009 |
July, 2009 |
June, 2009 |
May, 2009 |
April, 2009 |
March, 2009 |
February, 2009 |
January, 2009 |
December, 2008 |
November, 2008 |
October, 2008 |
September, 2008 |
August, 2008 |
July, 2008 |
June, 2008 |
May, 2008 |
April, 2008 |
March, 2008 |
February, 2008 |
January, 2008 |
December, 2007 |
November, 2007 |
October, 2007 |
September, 2007 |
August, 2007 |
July, 2007 |
June, 2007 |
May, 2007 |
April, 2007 |
March, 2007 |
February, 2007 |
January, 2007 |
December, 2006 |
November, 2006 |
October, 2006 |
September, 2006 |
August, 2006 |
July, 2006 |
June, 2006 |
May, 2006 |
April, 2006 |
March, 2006 |
February, 2006 |
January, 2006 |
December, 2005 |
November, 2005 |
October, 2005 |
September, 2005 |
August, 2005 |
July, 2005 |
June, 2005 |
May, 2005 |
April, 2005 |
March, 2005 |
February, 2005 |
January, 2005 |
December, 2004 |
November, 2004 |
October, 2004 |
September, 2004 |
August, 2004 |
July, 2004 |
June, 2004 |
May, 2004 |
April, 2004 |
March, 2004 |
February, 2004 |
January, 2004 |
December, 2003 |
November, 2003 |
October, 2003 |
September, 2003 |
August, 2003 |
July, 2003 |
June, 2003 |
May, 2003 |
January, 2003 |
November, 2002 |
October, 2002 |
September, 2002 |
August, 2002 |
July, 2002 |
Sad Princess Di Doll
Status: Fake (in the sense of being a doll), Real (in the sense of really being sold)
The Brits don't like the doll at all. The Mirror has declared it "probably the most tasteless, tackiest-ever tribute to Diana." Another Mirror columnist wrote: "She has bandy legs, a huge behind, hair like a crash-helmet, wild make-up, a hooked nose, no chest and ankles that make her look like she's got two club feet. Still, if you could blow the doll up, most men would choose to have sex with it before Camilla."
|
Categories: Celebrities Posted by Alex on Fri Feb 03, 2006 |
Comments (9) |
| More from the Hoax Museum Archives: | |||
Does the doll come with a Dodi Fayed, and their driver Henri Paul and can you buy a Mercedes-Benz S 280 to go with it. hey later if it is a success you can buy french photographers and they can come with there own motorbikes. that would be fun. blah
Posted by a rude man in a bad place on Fri Feb 03, 2006 at 09:13 PM
She has bandy legs, a huge behind, hair like a crash-helmet, wild make-up, a hooked nose, no chest and ankles that make her look like she's got two club feet.
Yes, but what about the doll?
I know I shouldn't but I can't help it...lmao Sharruma..
ok, now that I got that out of my system...
I find this whole thing morbidly distasteful, shame on you rude man and Sharruma and double shame on the makers of this tacky piece of shite.
I am pretty sure the "Princess of Whales bit is an attempt to circumvent potential lawsuits/cease and desist orders etc....at least thats what I assume.
Posted by Chuck in Rhode Island on Fri Feb 03, 2006 at 10:21 PM
ok, now that I got that out of my system...
I find this whole thing morbidly distasteful, shame on you rude man and Sharruma and double shame on the makers of this tacky piece of shite.
I am pretty sure the "Princess of Whales bit is an attempt to circumvent potential lawsuits/cease and desist orders etc....at least thats what I assume.
The parasites that set up the Diana memorial charity, or whatever they called themselves, spent all the money raised on Lawyers.
They sued an American firm for producing a Diana doll, claiming they had "the rights" on her image... WTF?
They lost, hahahaha
As for the Mirror claiming "probably the most tasteless, tackiest-ever tribute to Diana." - obviously they don't read their own newspaper.
Posted by Peter on Sat Feb 04, 2006 at 07:11 AM
They sued an American firm for producing a Diana doll, claiming they had "the rights" on her image... WTF?
They lost, hahahaha
As for the Mirror claiming "probably the most tasteless, tackiest-ever tribute to Diana." - obviously they don't read their own newspaper.
"the most tasteless, tackiest-ever tribute to Diana"
No. That would be a bronze statue of Diana and Dodi that was commissioned by Mohammed Fayed. It is called 'Innocent Victims' and it is ultra-kitsch:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2005-08-24-diana-statue_x.htm
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1068153&page=1
The true horror arises firstly from the fact that the sculpture of Diana does not look like her, secondly, it is not attractive in its own right, and ninthly Dodi is shown with an unbuttoned shirt as if he was Indiana Jones.
Statues of historical figures such as Lord Nelson standing on his column etc are posed and sculpted in such a way as to be flattering and grand, and are unnatural in this respect, but 'Innocent Victims' is so unnatural as to be bathetic.
In fact, if you look in the latest edition of the OED under "bathos" the compilers have simply put a small photograph of this statue. There is no more to say.
Posted by Ashley Pomeroy on Sat Feb 04, 2006 at 03:08 PM
No. That would be a bronze statue of Diana and Dodi that was commissioned by Mohammed Fayed. It is called 'Innocent Victims' and it is ultra-kitsch:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2005-08-24-diana-statue_x.htm
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1068153&page=1
The true horror arises firstly from the fact that the sculpture of Diana does not look like her, secondly, it is not attractive in its own right, and ninthly Dodi is shown with an unbuttoned shirt as if he was Indiana Jones.
Statues of historical figures such as Lord Nelson standing on his column etc are posed and sculpted in such a way as to be flattering and grand, and are unnatural in this respect, but 'Innocent Victims' is so unnatural as to be bathetic.
In fact, if you look in the latest edition of the OED under "bathos" the compilers have simply put a small photograph of this statue. There is no more to say.
"the most tasteless, tackiest-ever tribute to Diana"
I admit this is a very crowded field, but let's not forget "Sir" Elton John re-hacking "Candle in the Wind" and then releasing it as a single.
Posted by Big Gary in Uncertain, Texas in Dallas, Texas on Sun Feb 05, 2006 at 09:27 PM
I admit this is a very crowded field, but let's not forget "Sir" Elton John re-hacking "Candle in the Wind" and then releasing it as a single.
There have been some good nominations - great sculpture, Ashley! Thanks! - byt I propose that "the most tasteless, tackiest-ever tribute to Diana" was the woman's own Panorama interview.
Posted by outeast on Mon Feb 06, 2006 at 10:50 AM
Well, at least it's not a Real Doll........
Posted by Alan White on Mon Feb 06, 2006 at 06:21 PM
Truely tasteless would be a Diana blow-up doll. Then again, I am not that tacky.
Posted by Lounge Lizard in El Paso, Tx on Tue Jul 18, 2006 at 05:09 PM
Comments: Page 1 of 1 pages



