The Museum of Hoaxes
hoax archive hoax archive hoax archive hoax archive hoax archive
 
Jennifer Love Hewitt's Disappearing Breasts
Tourist Guy 9/11 Hoax, Sep 2001
The Man-Eating Tree of Madagascar Hoax, 1874
Cursed by Allah
Snowball the Monster Cat, 2000
Vilcabamba, the town of very old people, 1978
Did Paul McCartney die on Nov. 9, 1966?
Samsung invents the on/off switch
The boy with the golden tooth, 1593
The Instant Color TV Hoax, 1962
Politics and Photoshop
A Tory candidate, Ed Matts, in Dorset South (Great Britain) is being criticized for doctoring a photo. In the original photo he's shown attending a rally trying to prevent the deportation of an asylum-seeker. But in the version of the photo he placed on his website the sign he's holding has changed to apparently support a different (anti-immigration) position. The crowd has also disappeared. Seems like a strange attempt to rewrite history (and one's stance on an issue) by photoshop--though, of course, Matts says that the two views he's expressing are entirely reconcilable. (Thanks to Andrew for the link)
image
Categories: Photos/Videos, Politics
Posted by The Curator on Tue Apr 12, 2005
Comments (5)
Yup, good old British politicians.
Telling porkies is a way of life.
Posted by Boo  in  The Land of the Haggii...  on  Wed Apr 13, 2005  at  06:54 AM
WHAT... are you trying to tell me there's a dishonest politician out there somewhere. That whole concept is a giant hoax... there's no such thing!

wink
Posted by Mark-N-Isa  in  Midwest USA  on  Wed Apr 13, 2005  at  06:53 PM
I thought 'honest' politicians would be the hoax? Dishonest politicians, well, only have to look at what our country has spawned to realise the truth of that... rolleyes
Posted by Smerk  in  to mischief  on  Thu Apr 14, 2005  at  03:31 AM
How is "controlled immigration" the same as "anti immigration?" Not that I'm for or against this guy; I just don't see how those two concepts are the same.

If he's rallying to prevent the deportation of an asylum seeker, that's not anti immigration.

If by "controlled immigration" he means better, more clarified rules or something similar, that's still not anti immigration.
Posted by Ummm  on  Thu Apr 14, 2005  at  05:00 PM
Ummm, because his party demonize asylum-seekers (Today they are all poisioning terrorist fanatics).

In the minds of the target audience there is an irrational fear of being swamped by immigrants, which that party are exploiting. The people behind him are the "enemy".

The very true distinctions you make are, I am ashamed to say, beyond the average voter.
Posted by Peter  on  Thu Apr 14, 2005  at  07:02 PM
Commenting is no longer available for this post.
All text Copyright © 2014 by Alex Boese, except where otherwise indicated. All rights reserved.