Microwaved Water Kills Plants

Status: Undetermined
microwave experiment I've posted before about theories that microwaved food is bad for you, but this is slightly different. Some guy has posted pictures of his granddaughter's science fair project in which she tested the effect microwaved water would have on a plant. The result: the plant died. (Yes, the water had been cooled before she watered the plant with it.) But the plant given water that had been boiled on a stove did just fine. So what does this prove? That microwaved water is toxic? Not necessarily. The guy notes:

We have seen a number of comments on this, such as what was the water in the microwave boiled in. The thinking is that maybe some leaching took place if it was in plastic. It was boiled in a plastic cup, so this could be a possibility. Also it was not a double blind experiment, so she knew which was which when watering them. On top of that she was wanting the microwaved ones to do poorly, and although most scientists would dismiss the idea, it is possible that her thoughts toward each plant had an effect as well. Bottom line is, the results are interesting, and duplicate the results that others have reported (try Googling '"microwaved water" plants') more experiments need to be done with better controls and as a double blind study. But this was a simple 6th grade science fair project, and was never intended to be anything more than that. The plants were genetically identical, they were produced from graphs from the same parent plant, so that variable can be eliminated.

Intriguingly, the Straight Dope (a source I usually trust) has written an article about the controversy over microwave cooking, and he notes that scientists actually do not fully understand the chemical changes that take place when food is microwaved, and so there may indeed be some kind of "microwave effect." He notes a 1992 Stanford study that found microwaving breast milk mysteriously reduces its infection-fighting properties, as well as studies that have found that microwaves can accelerate certain chemical reactions. He writes: "'One suggestion,' a bunch of chemists wrote recently, 'is that this is some form of 'ponderomotive' driving force that arises when high frequency electric fields modulate ionic currents near interfaces with abrupt differences in ion mobility.'" He doesn't attempt to explain this theory.

I would repeat the girl's experiment myself, but everything I try to grow mysteriously dies, so there wouldn't be much point. (via The Greener Side)

Food Science

Posted on Fri Apr 21, 2006



Comments

One variable you may want to limit is pruning the microwave plant until it dies.
Posted by matthew144  on  Sat Apr 29, 2006  at  02:17 PM
Okay, I've set up a test of my own here.

Equipment:
9 plastic yoghurt cups (for pots), 3 labeled A, 3 labeled B, and 3 labeled C
3 small Pyrex bowls (for pots), labeled A, B, or C
3 small glass bowls (for pots), labeled A, B, or C
48 dried kidney beans
Potting soil
1 pint Pyrex measuring cup
3 glasses, labeled red, yellow, or blue

Preparations:
All of the pots were thoroughly washed and dried. The potting soil was thoroughly mixed, and equal amounts of it were put into each pot in random order. The beans were all put in a bowl and drawn out in random order to be placed in each pot. There are to be three beans in each pot, except for in the Pyrex bowls (which are slightly larger than the others, and will each have four).

The pots are grouped into threes: one in each group for water that has been unheated, one for water that has been microwaved to a strong boil, and one for water that has been heated to a strong boil in the oven.
Posted by Accipiter  on  Sat Apr 29, 2006  at  02:48 PM
The Experiment:
The groups of three pots are to be located in various positions around the house. The three glass bowls, the three Pyrex bowls, and three of the plastic cups will be grouped together, with the alphabetical placement of each cup in each set varying. Each of the other two groups of three plastic cups will be located in a different place in the house. This will hopefully give some indication if any germination or failure to germinate is potentially due to environmental factors other than the water (e.g. lighting, temperature, alien death rays, et cetera).

In each case, the water is to be collected, heated (if it is to be heated), and poured into one of the three glasses using the 1 pint Pyrex cup. The preparation of the water and the pouring it into the three glasses is to be done by one person, the pouring of the water from the glasses onto the beans by a second. This way, the person watering the plants has no knowledge of which water was treated in which way.

Each pot labeled "A" is to be given water only from the glass labeled with a certain specific colour throughout the experiment. Pots labeled "B" and "C" are to be treated likewise. Which colour glass is to be used with which letter of pot is to be known only to the individual watering the plants. In this way, the person preparing the water will not know which plants are receiving which type of water.

All of the pots in each test group are to be watered as simultaneously as possible, with the same amounts of water. Nothing else is to be given to the beans at any time. If anything is given to any pot, then it is to be added to the other two pots in the group in the same amount. If any pot is moved for any reason, then the others in the group will likewise be moved. All treatment for all three pots in each group is to be the same.

Testing for germination will conclude after two weeks if no germination occurs, or if a week passes with no new germinations. The beans will be monitored for germination, as well as the apparent health and growth rate of any shoots. If there is sufficient germination among the different experimental groups to warrant it, then the experiment may be carried on for additional weeks to monitor the growth of the bean plants as they mature.

Pictures will be taken of each pot at the start of the experiment. At the first sign of germination in any pot, then pictures of every pot shall be taken on a daily basis. A daily log will also be kept for each pot.

At the end of the experiment, the results will be studied to compare the germination rates of experiment groups A, B, and C. It will then be determined whether any group displayed an overall better or worse germination rate than the other groups. After this, then it shall be made known which groups were given which type of water.
Posted by Accipiter  on  Sat Apr 29, 2006  at  02:48 PM
First, thank you Accipiter for doing what I'm pretty much too lazy to do. I do enough research to make an argument, but I lose interest before I can follow up on anyone else's arguments... And while I considered my own plant experiment, I'd end up not keeping enough details for it to be worth anything.

Of course, any results of your experiment are strictly anecdotal...
Posted by hcmomof4  on  Sun Apr 30, 2006  at  07:33 PM
But please keep me posted, because I really would like to know what happens.
Posted by hcmomof4  on  Sun Apr 30, 2006  at  07:33 PM
Where are your results???
Posted by Bob  on  Thu May 11, 2006  at  09:21 AM
Well, after two and a half weeks, the results are: none of the seeds have germinated! Obviously, this means that water itself is toxic and kills plants. . .

I might try this test again with a different batch of seeds that I get from a different store, if I feel motivated enough.
Posted by Accipiter  on  Tue May 16, 2006  at  11:59 PM
Yeah, right, blame the water, or the seeds... You are a plant murderer!!!

Although, I suppose since they never germinated at all, it would be seed murderer.

You will notice I didn't offer to try this. That's because it takes all the green-ness I own to keep the 3 plants I already have alive.
Posted by hcmomof4  on  Wed May 17, 2006  at  03:21 PM
Perhaps I shouldn't have tried growing the plants on a bed of 30000
Posted by Accipiter  on  Wed May 17, 2006  at  05:53 PM
I tried this same experiment at home for several weeks and both plants remained completely healthy.

There are so many different possibilities for why her plant died - I highly doubt it was due to the water being microwaved.
Posted by Michelle  on  Fri Jun 02, 2006  at  02:48 PM
I travel to Russia very frequently; microwave ovens are legal and used to heat & reheat foodstuffs. When I queried some Russian business associates regarding any 'ban' of microwave ovens in Russia, I was scoffed at.
Posted by bayonet  on  Sat Jul 29, 2006  at  02:38 PM
Regards microwaved water and plant health.

1. L Ron Hubbard proved conclusively in the 1950s that plants respond to thought.

2. Unless a microwave mysteriously changes the chemical makeup of water, H20 goes in, boils, and H2O comes out. If something else comes out, maybe somebody should try microwaving lead -- perhaps they will get gold! 😊
Posted by Ken McLeod  on  Mon Jul 31, 2006  at  09:14 PM
1. L Ron Hubbard proved conclusively that he was a loon, nothing more.

2. Microwaves do have the ability to alter the chemical composition of water with contaminants, which all water contains. The question is if this actually happens in real life and does it create something that inhibits plant growth.
Posted by Charybdis  on  Tue Aug 01, 2006  at  08:58 AM
I was shocked when I saw this "water experiment." So I decided to do my own experiment. I had also read somewhere that pouring microwaved water on seeds would prevent them from germinating. Well, I'm into the 2nd week of this experiment and unfortunately, all seeds have germinated are growing very nicely. I'm actually kind of unhappy about this result because I was hoping I could blame microwave ovens on the incredible increase in cancer deaths over the last two decades.
Posted by Pat  on  Wed Aug 23, 2006  at  10:47 PM
I have actually conducted this experiment for my biology class. I used 15 cups for tap water and 15 cups for microwaved water, for a total of 30 cups. I used generic potting soil and pinto beans. At first it seemed like the microwaved water beans were growing at a much faster rate. Four of my microwaved water beans were at 2 inches within the 4th day while most of the contorl were under 1 inch. On the 7th day is when things changed. Many of my microwaved water plants seemed to stop growing, one wilted. This could have been human error, or a special exception that would deem it negligible. I'm still growing them till this day, which is the 10th day. Only 5 of 15 microwaved water beans are still alive while 9 of 15 control beans are alive. Today, it seems like the ones that are still alive have roughly experienced similiar growth.

I probably will conclude on my paper that there is no difference.

I do have a question though. Can plants grow from pure water like distilled water? If so, the mutation or change in the solution of tap water would be negligible because plants will only use h2o. Correct me if im wrong, please.
Posted by Joey  on  Sat Oct 14, 2006  at  03:13 AM
My class replicated this experiment and showed it to be false.

<a >Does cooled microwaved water kill plants?</a>
Posted by Jared Graham  on  Fri Nov 24, 2006  at  01:32 AM
I don't know why the URL in my last post loops back to this page. I guess I only though I knew what I was doing.

If you what to see the experiment results you can go to http://www.eclecticscience.net - there is a link "Does cooled microwaved water kill plants?"
Posted by Jared Graham  on  Fri Nov 24, 2006  at  01:36 AM
I'm doing the same project for Science Horizons. My Results are telling me that microwave water is making my plant grow faster. I'm doing the project twice to see if both results are the same and so far they both are.
Posted by Jaci Jowdy  on  Sat Dec 30, 2006  at  06:43 PM
For Jaci Jowdy-
What is you test subject size. There is quite a bit of variation in plant growth as you probably know, and the more subjects you have the better. We only did the experiment for 10 days because the school year was ending, but now we are starting a new experiment with aquariums (testing both plants and fish). I have not boiled the control water, although it is bottled water, so it has been treated. For more info on our new experiment drop by our site - comments are appreciated.

I'm interested to know how your experiment turns out.

http://www.eclecticscience.net
Posted by Jared Graham  on  Sun Dec 31, 2006  at  03:18 AM
what if i do this proj. what would be my main problem for this and would i change the title/name of the proj.?
Posted by flo  on  Sun Jan 14, 2007  at  01:24 AM
Sorry I acedentaly pressed enter. But my results are: Bolied water-25in.with 3 flowers, microwave water-26in. with 4 flowers, tap water-20in.with 1 flower, and bottled water-17in. with no flowers. I would love to know what type of plant ur granddaughter used for my project.
Posted by Jaci Jowdy  on  Sat Jan 27, 2007  at  07:58 AM
Cute
Posted by bulldog101  on  Tue Feb 06, 2007  at  04:20 PM
I am going 2 try this for my science project right now. THis is where I am gettin my information. Very Intresting!!
Posted by Bulldog102  on  Tue Feb 06, 2007  at  04:22 PM
I did my own experiment with flower seeds with plain tap water, boiled water, and microwaved water. All seeds germinated (although I was hoping the microwaved ones wouldn't). Water is water is water. It has been down through eons of time and will continue to be water. This little girl's experiment was absolutely bogus. We've got enought hoaxes going on today. We don't need someone to pull this kind of stunt.
Posted by Pat  on  Tue Feb 06, 2007  at  06:08 PM
im doing mt own project.
Posted by aaron  on  Sat Feb 10, 2007  at  09:04 PM
My son's science fair project was rooting 1 slip of a ficus plant in room temperature microwaved water and 1 slip of ficus plant in tap water from our well. After 30 days of observation, the plant in tap water from our well has sprouted roots. The plant slip in microwaved water has not formed roots at all. Both plants were placed in the same window each in identical glass containers. The microwaved water was boiled in a glass container and then cooled to room temperature.
Posted by Hal Hoov  on  Mon Mar 26, 2007  at  08:21 PM
Although I appalled your son
Posted by Jared Graham  on  Mon Mar 26, 2007  at  11:06 PM
Hi,
When I started UNI, I had limited space so I cooked all my food in a microwave. 6 months later I was diagnosed with an autoimmunity. I didn't take any drugs ro meds and during that time I didn't stress. I have reason to believe that the increase in autoimmune diseases (maybe cancer as well) we see is due to the fact that more and more food companies switch to easy microwaveable food.
Posted by Philip Oosthuizen  on  Tue Apr 24, 2007  at  09:38 AM
Our brains tend to want to connect all the dots, so to speak, and sometimes see correlations where there are no real correlations. Our cavalier attitude toward polluting our environment has lead to an increase in health problems globally. The only way to be sure if your microwave oven caused the problem is have someone conduct a study, and even this is difficult because of the vast amount of variables involved. The bottom line is: How do we know which variable (or combination of variables) caused the problem? The cause of most autoimmune diseases is unknown - but they have plagued us long before microwaved ovens came on the scene.
Posted by Jared Graham  on  Sat May 05, 2007  at  02:31 PM
why does this happen to the plant being watered by microwaved water?
Posted by denni  on  Mon May 14, 2007  at  10:03 PM
If anyone wants to verify if the water will kill plants, just start watering one of your plants with microwaved and cooled water. Don't dismiss the results without doing your own testing.
Posted by Dave  on  Tue Oct 16, 2007  at  04:06 PM
pattyf77 said, "Why are we so quick to denounce efforts to reveal the truth when those truths may affect capitalistic enterprise or our modern conveniences?"

The key point is the experiment above is a fraud. Follow this link for why I say this:

http://www.eclecticscience.net/experiments/001-microwave-plants/original_experiment/index.html

You can't tell the truth through a lie. Just because Dr. Mercola is popular doesn't mean he is correct. Here's another view of him:
http://gyxe.com/breast-implant/5-073-dr-mercola-is-a-fraud-read.shtml

or simply Goggle his name along with the word quack and you get a lot of interesting reading. If you fear microwaved food, by all means avoid it. But don't defend obviously fraudulent web evidence. Stick to the science journals and trusted sources.
Posted by Mark  on  Wed Oct 17, 2007  at  09:27 PM
i am doing this for my science fair.... i will keep in touch w/ photos + info from my project, this will be decent info.
Posted by William  on  Thu Nov 01, 2007  at  07:54 PM
i think ur all wrong yo
Posted by jesz  on  Mon Nov 19, 2007  at  02:52 PM
You stupid crackers ....microwave water is good for plants it makes my apple trees produce oranges....fuck ya
Posted by Pompousass  on  Tue Jan 08, 2008  at  10:23 AM
leave the litle gril be..people keep giving me a hard time and that's why i got knocked up...let her be..or she'll get stressed and do the same thing...BE NICE

peace

i love my sis brit..and my lil nephews...foget k fed
Posted by Zoey 101  on  Tue Jan 08, 2008  at  10:25 AM
I have actually done an experiment on that and when we fed plants microwaved water there was no difference between that and the control group

here is the text of my abstract

We did an experiment on microwaving water. We wanted to see whether the rumor was true that microwaving water killed plants. We had looked online and supposedly some girl had done an experiment where she microwaved water and fed it to one plant and then fed another plant tap water. She said the one that got microwaved water died. We checked many other places and we also found that a Swedish scientist named Dr. Hans Hertell had conducted a similar experiment. He and some of his colleagues had eaten nothing but microwaved food for a week. After the experiment, they had increased cholesterol and decrease hemoglobin levels and they also had a lower white blood cell percentage. When we tried to find more experiments with plants we could not find anything but the one source. So we decided to do an experiment with more complicated variables to see if it really was the microwaved water that killed the plant.
For our experiment we fed 8 different solutions to 32 different pole bean plants. Our solutions were microwaved, boiled, distilled, and tap water all either with or without fertilizer. Each day we fed the plants a set amount of their solutions usually from 3 to 5 tablespoons on each solution. Then we measured the plants. We only put in fertilizer once a week. We user skewers to hold the plants up and we tried to measure them several times.
Our experiment is done and we have found that the microwaved water has not killed the plants. The microwaved plants were actually doing quite fine and some are taller than the boiled and distilled too.
Posted by scientist  on  Thu Mar 27, 2008  at  07:39 AM
pattyf77: Stop your jibber-jabber. I pity the fool who believes in psuedoscience....
Posted by Mr. T  on  Wed Apr 09, 2008  at  11:38 AM
My daughter decided to do a similar experiment so I decided to run my own in parallel (because I could let things grow longer than she could due to her school assignment deadline). Here are the photos I took along the way.

Yes, it's a tiny sample set. Yes, lots of things could account for the differences. I don't claim anything other than "here's another datapoint".

The water used for both plants came from the bottled water we have delivered to our house. We boiled one batch on the stove in a pot and the other in a pyrex container in the microwave. The water boiled for 10 minutes in each case. It was then stored in plastic Dasani water containers which had been washed out with soap, rinsed thoroughly, and allowed to dry. After that, we simply watered the plants every day making a small effort to put the same amount of water into each pot.

Here's the link to the images:
http://www.flickr.com/gp/11367898@N06/tE769B
Posted by Mike  on  Tue Apr 15, 2008  at  11:35 PM
In another experiment, anthroposophist A. Bohmert, reported that water samples were heated, some in a microwave oven and others conventionally, and then left to cool before use. These water samples were used to bring grain to germination. The grain in contact with microwaved water was the only one that did not germinate.
Posted by Cancer-causing chemicals in cooked meats  on  Wed Dec 03, 2008  at  09:39 PM
well i am doin a sci project about watering plants with tap and microwaved water to see what is good or bad for the plants so i htink that microwaved water is so bad because what people say about using microwaved so ya 😊 😛
Posted by Gerrinan  on  Fri Jan 30, 2009  at  01:32 PM
what a fucking ass is this these bitchis are gone mad fuckerrrrrrrsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss.
Posted by samantha  on  Thu Feb 12, 2009  at  04:36 PM
My son and I just performed this experiment double blind. This is disproved. All plants are fine. Snopes also debunked this some time back. (Wish I had found that before we did this as an experiment for school.)
Posted by Big Daddy  on  Sat Mar 21, 2009  at  04:22 PM
You might be interested in an experiment I am presently conducting with tomato seeds:
http://microwavetest.blogspot.com/
Posted by Robert Harwood  on  Sun Mar 22, 2009  at  12:11 PM
hello hello 😊 😛
Posted by GG  on  Mon Mar 23, 2009  at  02:27 PM
I microwaved my Congressman and he started to spend money uncontrollably. Do you think this is related to the microwaving, or to the fact that he's an out-of-touch millionaire with many sleazy ties to special interest groups?
Posted by Joey  on  Sun Mar 29, 2009  at  09:54 AM
🐛 I think it's VERY good
Posted by Archangel  on  Wed Apr 01, 2009  at  03:21 AM
Microwaved water may not be harmful but it is dfinitely not the same as unmicrowaved water. Microwaved food has been PROVEN to be different and harful to human consumption in many rigourous scientific trials. Microwaved water may be benign it may be healthier and it may also be harmful. SWhy not seriously examine this instead of taking it personally and dismissing it? People are too insecure to look at their lifestyles and objectively analyze anything.
Posted by victor  on  Tue Oct 20, 2009  at  10:19 PM
That "experiment" is a hoax. There are several websites that expose it for what it is - bunk. You can find links to these sites on post below. That plant was trimmed to death within minutes. If you superimpose the photos over one another you'll see the experiment plant does not change position, yet plants move all the time.

For the person claiming "Microwaved food has been PROVEN to be different and harful [sic] to human consumption...," please list the studies. I know of no reputable study that confirms this statement. I'm not saying it isn't possible, I saying show me the evidence.
Posted by Mark  on  Fri Oct 30, 2009  at  11:02 AM
After seeing this I tried it myself.
I didn't boil the water (why would you??) just heated it. I also heated 'control' water on a stove to the same temp (75C) cooled it then germinated and grew wheatgrass. Each day with freshly microwaved and heated water.
One batch with untreated water.
One batch with water that was re-microwaved daily to make sure I "killed" it!

The result: growth rate, size, appearance and taste....all the same!
Posted by Ron  on  Thu Feb 25, 2010  at  12:22 PM
Comments: Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.