The Museum of Hoaxes
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   FORUM   |   CONTACT   |   PINTEREST   |   FACEBOOK   |   TWITTER   |   RSS
The Top 100
April Fool Hoaxes
Of All Time
April Fool's Day
Gallery
Hoax Photo
Archive

From the Archives: Miss Perfect Profile
Status: Advertising gimmick
Arthur Davis, who ran a New York-based model agency in the 1950s, hit upon a novel way to get his models featured in newspapers. He simply invented titles they had supposedly won, awarded by important-sounding but fictitious organizations. For instance, he might claim that one of his models had just been chosen "Miss Perfect Profile" by the "Plastic Surgeons Institute." Or that another had been chosen "Miss Secret Mission" by the "Canadian Northwest Mounties Organization." Newspapers would invariably run their photos. Shown is "Miss Perfect Profile." More info (and pictures of his models) in the hoaxipedia.

I wonder what titles the Museum of Hoaxes could award? Miss Pareidolia? Miss Statement of Facts? Miss Informed?
Categories: Advertising
Posted by Alex on Fri Apr 18, 2008
Comments (7)
More from the Hoax Museum Archives:
How about Miss Information?

J/P=?
Posted by John Paradox  in  Tucson, AZ  on  Fri Apr 18, 2008  at  08:17 PM
Miss Anthropy, Miss Creant, Miss Bent Youth, Miss Dabuss... stop me before I miss again
Posted by Hairy Houdini  on  Sat Apr 19, 2008  at  12:24 AM
Guys like Arthur Davis and Jim Moran used to be called "press agents." Today, they call them "guerrilla marketers." Language inflation.
Posted by Cranky Media Guy  on  Sun Apr 20, 2008  at  02:38 AM
Well, newspapers and magazines aren't exactly reluctant to run new pictures of pretty women, so it was a win-win proposition.

It would be interesting to know if he got any more pictures in the papers this way than he would have if he had simply sent the pictures without the bogus titles.

Come to think of it, beauty pageants like Miss Universe, Miss America, Miss Teen Arizona, etc., are really pretty much the same scheme.
Posted by Big Gary  in  Venus, Texas  on  Mon Apr 21, 2008  at  05:08 PM
Actually, the most interesting aspect of the entire thing has nothing to do with made-up titles. The photograph clearly shows the stunning difference between what was considered attractive in the 1950's compared to today. Right now, that woman would absolutely be considered a plus-size model or maybe the "before" picture in a Weight Watchers ad. It is a measure of how repellently and dangerously anorexic models have become today that this can possibly be true.
Posted by Anise  in  Nashville, TN  on  Thu May 15, 2008  at  08:11 PM
Anise, excellent point. Although slender girls were also featured in pinups, this lass is certainly what would not be considered glamourous today but would have been acceptable and even desirable back then.

Mind you, though she is is cute, she's not my type - Her feet are podgy and knobbly.
Posted by DFStuckey  in  Auckland New Zealand  on  Mon Aug 18, 2008  at  08:46 PM
Well, newspapers and magazines aren't exactly reluctant to run new pictures of pretty women, so it was a win-win proposition.
Posted by luzy  in  usa  on  Tue Jun 21, 2011  at  03:59 AM
Comments: Page 1 of 1 pages

Note: Comments by non-members are all checked by a moderator before appearing on the site. This may take a while. If you're not a spammer, you can join here.




Smileys