Get MOH Blog Posts by Email
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
 |
Our Sister Sites
Site Map
Blog Categories
Advertising |
Animals |
April Fools Day |
Art |
Bad Excuses |
Birth/Babies |
Body Manipulation |
Books |
Business/Finance |
Celebrations |
Celebrities |
Con Artists |
Conspiracy Theories |
Crop Circles |
Cryptozoology |
Nessie |
Death |
eBay |
Education |
Email Hoaxes |
Entertainment |
Exploration/Travel |
Extraterrestrial Life |
Fashion |
Folklore/Tall Tales |
Food |
Free Energy |
Future/Time |
Gnomes |
Gross |
Hate Crimes/Terror |
Health/Medicine |
History |
Identity/Imposters |
Journalism |
Law/Police/Crime |
Literature/Language |
Magic |
Mass Delusion |
Military |
Miscellaneous |
Music |
Paranormal |
Pareidolia |
Photos/Videos |
Places |
Politics |
Pranks |
Products |
Pseudoscience |
Psychology |
Radio |
Religion |
Scams |
Science |
Sex/Romance |
Social Networking Sites |
Sports |
Technology |
Urban Legends |
Videos |
Websites
Blog Archives
May, 2013 |
April, 2013 |
March, 2013 |
February, 2013 |
January, 2013 |
October, 2012 |
September, 2012 |
August, 2012 |
July, 2012 |
June, 2012 |
May, 2012 |
April, 2012 |
March, 2012 |
February, 2012 |
January, 2012 |
December, 2011 |
November, 2011 |
October, 2011 |
September, 2011 |
August, 2011 |
November, 2010 |
April, 2010 |
January, 2010 |
December, 2009 |
November, 2009 |
October, 2009 |
September, 2009 |
August, 2009 |
July, 2009 |
June, 2009 |
May, 2009 |
April, 2009 |
March, 2009 |
February, 2009 |
January, 2009 |
December, 2008 |
November, 2008 |
October, 2008 |
September, 2008 |
August, 2008 |
July, 2008 |
June, 2008 |
May, 2008 |
April, 2008 |
March, 2008 |
February, 2008 |
January, 2008 |
December, 2007 |
November, 2007 |
October, 2007 |
September, 2007 |
August, 2007 |
July, 2007 |
June, 2007 |
May, 2007 |
April, 2007 |
March, 2007 |
February, 2007 |
January, 2007 |
December, 2006 |
November, 2006 |
October, 2006 |
September, 2006 |
August, 2006 |
July, 2006 |
June, 2006 |
May, 2006 |
April, 2006 |
March, 2006 |
February, 2006 |
January, 2006 |
December, 2005 |
November, 2005 |
October, 2005 |
September, 2005 |
August, 2005 |
July, 2005 |
June, 2005 |
May, 2005 |
April, 2005 |
March, 2005 |
February, 2005 |
January, 2005 |
December, 2004 |
November, 2004 |
October, 2004 |
September, 2004 |
August, 2004 |
July, 2004 |
June, 2004 |
May, 2004 |
April, 2004 |
March, 2004 |
February, 2004 |
January, 2004 |
December, 2003 |
November, 2003 |
October, 2003 |
September, 2003 |
August, 2003 |
July, 2003 |
June, 2003 |
May, 2003 |
January, 2003 |
November, 2002 |
October, 2002 |
September, 2002 |
August, 2002 |
July, 2002 |
Everything is back to normal
After a couple days of fussing with the design of the site, I've decided to put everything back to almost the way I had it when I started -- except for a few minor tweaks. I decided I couldn't stand having the google ads smack in the middle of the weblog, even if they do generate more money there. (It's probably a trade off anyway between making more money and driving off readers, so it comes out even in the end.) You can all carry on as if nothing ever happened.
|
Categories: Miscellaneous Posted by Alex on Wed Aug 15, 2007 |
Comments (10) |
| More from the Hoax Museum Archives: | |||
You're funny Alex...
It looked "ok" earlier even with all the suggested changes being made, but it is kinda nice to see the front page look "familiar" again.
Thanks for being flexible.
Posted by Aj aka Oppiejoe in Haslett MI (but currently someplace forbidden...) on Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 12:46 AM
It looked "ok" earlier even with all the suggested changes being made, but it is kinda nice to see the front page look "familiar" again.
Thanks for being flexible.
It does look much better. But I do feel guilty about being one of those to pressure you into changing your ad policy. I had kind of assumed that google ads paid a pittance... I mean, does anyone ever actually click on them?
Posted by outeast in Prague, Czech Rep on Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 10:26 AM
Someone is clicking on the ads. I don't think it's regular visitors to the site. I suspect it's people who stumble on the site via a search engine looking for something else, and then see an ad that interests them, and proceed along on their way.
Posted by Alex in San Diego on Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 03:39 PM
Ha, the Google ad on this page right now says, "Shut down Bonsai Kitten."
Obviously somebody doesn't know their market.
"Save Bonsai Kitten" would be much more popular with MoH readers.
Posted by Big Gary in Tokio, Texas on Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 08:01 PM
Obviously somebody doesn't know their market.
"Save Bonsai Kitten" would be much more popular with MoH readers.
I noticed that too. I was wondering just how the Peta people manage to breathe if they think that a petition will "Shut down Bonsai Kitten for good". I mean, do they not understand that it will just be mirrored by someone else and back up? Have they not heard of Freedom of Speech? Who will they present the petition to, Donald George Smith?
If they can successfully petition to have the website permanently banned, couldn't everyone else petition to have Peta permanently banned?
Sorry, I'm on a ramble, but the whole premise of their petition peeves me every time I see it.
Posted by Transfrmr in deep trouble on Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 09:48 PM
If they can successfully petition to have the website permanently banned, couldn't everyone else petition to have Peta permanently banned?
Sorry, I'm on a ramble, but the whole premise of their petition peeves me every time I see it.
Transfrmr, I doubt PETA is actually behind it. My guess is someone else is doing it to make PETA look bad. Granted it would be hard for anyone else to make PETA look any worse than they make themselves look, but my guess is someone tried.
Posted by Christopher Cole in Tucson, AZ on Fri Aug 17, 2007 at 06:50 PM
Transfrmr, what makes you think PETA (if it's really them behind the campaign) really believes a petition could ban the Bonsai Kittens for good? I suspect, like most of the stuff PETA does, it's just an attention-getting stunt. And maybe a well-considered one, too: the sort of humorless twit who can't figure out that the Bonsai Kittens are a joke is exactly the gullible type PETA is looking for.
Posted by Big Gary in Muleshoe, Texas on Fri Aug 17, 2007 at 06:53 PM
Christopher, I'm pretty sure it's Peta, considering the link is to peta2.com and the Whois lookup turns up this:
PETA Foundation
501 Front St
Norfolk, Virginia 23510
United States
(757) 622-7382
I do agree with Big Gary that it is likely a publicity stunt. Regardless, the whole premise of the stunt disgusts me. They should stick to naked celebrities, rather than insulting freedom.
Posted by Transfrmr in deep trouble on Sat Aug 18, 2007 at 01:51 AM
PETA Foundation
501 Front St
Norfolk, Virginia 23510
United States
(757) 622-7382
I do agree with Big Gary that it is likely a publicity stunt. Regardless, the whole premise of the stunt disgusts me. They should stick to naked celebrities, rather than insulting freedom.
"Everything is back to normal"... whoa, that's mighty all-encompassing. To be honest, I wasn't aware that EveryThing was Abnormal, but I kinda sensed it, you know? See, I should just follow my instincts. I guess I will, now that Everything Is Back to Normal. Wait, what about the lunatic in The White House? That's not normal... or, is it? hmmm
Posted by Hairy Houdini on Sat Aug 18, 2007 at 08:03 PM
i just saw that "shut down bonsai kitten" google ad on another site, and decided to create a "stop the stop the bonsai kitten petitions" petition of my own:
http://www.petitiononline.com/probonsk/petition.html
Posted by smartygirl on Sat Oct 20, 2007 at 07:54 PM
http://www.petitiononline.com/probonsk/petition.html
Comments: Page 1 of 1 pages