The Museum of Hoaxes
hoax archive hoax archive hoax archive hoax archive hoax archive
 
Dog wins art contest, 1974
The Society for Indecency to Naked Animals, 1959
Cat that walked 3000 miles to find its owners, 1951
The Hoaxing Hitchhiker, 1941
Loch Ness Monster Hoaxes
Mule elected G.O.P. committeeman, 1938
Stotham, Massachusetts: the town that didn't exist, 1920
BMW's April Fool's Day Hoaxes
The disumbrationist art hoax, 1924
The Great Electric Sugar Swindle, 1884
China Moon Controversy
Last week Chinese prime minister Wen Jiabao released the first photograph taken by the Chang-e 1 lunar probe. The picture showed the surface of the moon. Wen declared, "Chinese people's dream of flying to the moon for more than 1,000 years has started to materialize."

But then people on the internet started to point out that the picture looked an awful lot like a NASA picture from 2005. In fact, the two photos looked almost identical. So now the Chinese lunar probe programme is defending itself against charges of fakery.

To be fair to the Chinese, the two photos aren't entirely alike. The shadows are different, and the Chinese photo shows an extra crater. So the similarity is likely a result of the fact that both photos happen to show the same part of the moon. But it's nice to see that China has just as many conspiracy theorists as America does, ready to doubt anything produced by their government space program.

Below are the Chinese (left) and American (right) moon pictures side by side (from the Telegraph). The red circle indicates where the Chinese picture shows an extra crater.

Categories: Photos/Videos, Science
Posted by The Curator on Mon Dec 03, 2007
Comments (14)
It's not fake. Explanation here: http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00001248/
Posted by P.falc  on  Mon Dec 03, 2007  at  07:48 PM
what I meant to say, the extra crater is an artefact.
Posted by P.falc  on  Mon Dec 03, 2007  at  07:50 PM
Never believe anyhting until the government has denied it.
Posted by Christopher Cole  in  Tucson, AZ  on  Mon Dec 03, 2007  at  10:41 PM
I did not miss Judge Crater, and I do not judge the missing crater, but the greater crater might, right? Chinese to me
Posted by Hairy Houdini  on  Tue Dec 04, 2007  at  01:26 AM
It's funny to see that a 2 year old NASA photo has better resolution than an up to date Chinese photo. I guess the Chinese haven't gotten around to stealing western imaging technology.
Posted by Viking  on  Tue Dec 04, 2007  at  12:32 PM
According to the above linked Planetary Society article: http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00001248/ the C,lementine resolution was 145 m/pixel, and the Chang'e resolution is a slightly better 120 m/pixel. FYI.
Posted by R  on  Tue Dec 04, 2007  at  01:34 PM
How come the extra crater is on the US picture on the RIGHT?
Posted by Mark Johnson  on  Tue Dec 04, 2007  at  04:15 PM
Mark, either you or your monitor is upside down.
Posted by David B.  on  Tue Dec 04, 2007  at  04:59 PM
What's really amazing is the poor quality of the Chinese photograph. It's a much lower quality that the older NASA pic. Get ready for a series of launch pad and near orbit disasters resulting in Chinese pilots dieing fiery deaths...


http://www.theskinofmyteeth.com


David B.
Posted by David B.  on  Tue Dec 04, 2007  at  06:42 PM
Such condescension. No wonder colored people hate our guts. Any other White countries come as far as China?
Posted by Aaron Boyes  in  Canada  on  Wed Dec 05, 2007  at  03:43 PM
Aaron, what David means, clearly, is that if the Chinese don't have the technical capability to match the quality of the photograph, it is doubtful that they have the technology to be succesful in getting people into orbit. I disagree, I think the Chinese have just as good a chance as the Russians or we had decades ago. However, you sound like someone who makes a profession out of being easily offended.
Posted by Christopher Cole  in  Tucson, AZ  on  Wed Dec 05, 2007  at  04:14 PM
Emily Lakdawalla of Planetary Society said Chang'e 1 image of the moon isn't fake.
http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00001248/

I think she jumped to a conclusion too quick. Does she aware China is expert in counterfeit? The main question is: how come ONLY ONE PICTURE?
Japanese's Kaguya sent back many pictures and moving images.

I won't believe it until I see the second picture!

paul
Posted by paul  in  Calgary, Alberta, Canada  on  Wed Dec 05, 2007  at  04:36 PM
'it is doubtful that they have the technology to be successful in getting people into orbit.'

According to ww.space.com/missionlaunches/, the Chinese have had several successful launches of manned craft in 2005 and are in fcat at about a comparable levenl to the US at the time of the late lamented Gemini project.

not bad for people who cannot use forks, eh? ( Sorry, redneck joke )
Posted by DFStuckey  in  Auckland New Zealand  on  Fri Feb 15, 2008  at  04:36 AM
I would like to see a follow up: one thing I have noticed is that only ONE (1) photo has ever been released by China. ONE! When other countries send stuff up, hundreds, even thousands of photos are obtained. Here, we have one. Did the probe break down? Did it fly by the moon and not enter orbit? Why only one photo?
Posted by Jake  in  USA  on  Thu Sep 25, 2008  at  05:19 PM
Commenting is no longer available for this post.
All text Copyright © 2014 by Alex Boese, except where otherwise indicated. All rights reserved.