‘Lickable’ Breyers Ad
Status: Hoax
You may feel that you need to scrub your eyeballs after seeing this supposed ad for Breyers ice cream, so if you
click on the link don't say I didn't warn you. (The ad is disturbing for what it suggests, not for what it actually shows.) However, the ad definitely isn't real, which is obvious if you read the text on the right-hand side of it. I don't know who created it, but it wasn't Breyers. Unfortunately the image is now circulating around the internet in a reduced size that makes the text hard to read, leading some people to think that it might actually be a real ad.
Posted By: Alex | Date:
Tue May 02, 2006 |
Permalink |
Total Comments: 52
Category:
Advertising,
Gross
Comments
Listed in chronological order. Newest comments at the end.
Page 3 of 3 pages < 1 2 3
lol u guise fail at the internets
lurk moar
Posted by Anon on Wed Aug 06, 2008 at 03:11 AM
"Flavour?" Obvious fake.
Posted by earl on Wed Aug 06, 2008 at 04:31 AM
The only thing funny about this are people's reactions to it.
Posted by LY THE FAIRY on Wed Aug 06, 2008 at 09:06 AM
I have to agree. This achieved EXACTLY what it was meant to do. Offend the closed minded self rightious brigade. Cause others to question their own morals. Parody the doubleface absurdity of some of our laws and the opinions of our peers (Mostly driven by media hysteria I may ad). 'Oh but it's so cute of those young girls to wear that 'sexy' outfit!'
Most people are hippocrites and two faced liars who pander to their peers 'just in case' they are seen as a bad egg. Then they go back to their hovels and perform violent acts on thier wives/cheat on their husbands etc.
Humanity is always bealting on about how it wants to do good whilst imposing their own moral views on others to the point it has come to bloodshed. Sure you can show people getting butchered on the TV screen. But show a womens breast? My God! Call the feds!
We need more of this type of stuff just to get peoples brains actually working for a change. Without challenging 'the norm' homosexuality would still be a criminal offence (and still is in some countries).
'Let he who has not sinned cast the first stone' should be changed to 'let he who has not had immoral thoughts jail those he does not agree with'.
Posted by Affronted Religious Zealot on Wed Aug 06, 2008 at 09:18 AM
It's a Cute little girl in an orange leotard...
Nothing else... grow up people and stop crying about some stupid rant. IF you don't like the humor, the girl, or the ice cream....
DONT LOOK AT IT, EAT IT, or PAY ATTENTION TO IT!
"I'm a mother and I am so appauled....blah blah blah..."
SHUT UP!! I bet you allow your kids to watch talevision, right? There is more harm in watching television than this.
I bet you are a munter. That's why this bother's you so much... she's cuter than you...
Jealousy is such an ugly thing.
Here is another picture of this cutie
Posted by Uijeongbu on Wed Aug 06, 2008 at 01:09 PM
I think it might be making fun of the extent advertising will go to to make money, as in if they found out the bigger market was to paedophiles they might make an ad like this..
maybe?
... people sure do seem to like money -.-
Posted by LOL on Wed Aug 06, 2008 at 04:41 PM
You people are all ridiculous. This is extremely funny, I was eating cereal when I saw it and almost sprayed it all over the screen. Anyone who doesn't think this is amusing is clearly a paedophile themselves. The humor should be the unexpected juxtaposition of young, innocent children and sexual innuendo. The idea is that the comparision should be ludicrous, illiciting a positive humor response. If you have a negative response then your first thought must have been that the two ideas belong side by side, which is incredibly disturbing. If you were disturbed by this then you should be many times more disturbed by yourself.
Posted by Jim on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 04:35 AM
It's not the photo that makes it sexual, it's the context. This isn't something to spark real conversation other than people saying "I'd tap that", "this is disgusting" or "get over it".
Just because something is shocking doesn't mean it sparks an interesting and educational debate. This doesn't make me think "our society really does sexualize children, we should discuss this and do something about it". It just resembles some idiots idea of toilet humor with as much message behind it as a your mom joke.
Posted by Robin on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 09:01 AM
wow, these pics are from a website that pretty much shows child porn (little girls in small clothing posing in ways that certain body parts might be, opps, exposed). And this ad was made "for the lulz". There is no secret message or conotation. It was made by someone on 4chan just to be funny.
Posted by anonymous on Thu Aug 21, 2008 at 09:51 AM
child porn ??? I think you are retarded... since when is a girl in a swimsuit considered porn?? I guess when I go to the beach I'd better watch out because I am in a porno... YOU F'N RETARD. That's like sayin watching "Baywatch" or any other program with a girl in a bikini is the same as watching porn. Maybe in your tiny miniscule mind it is... or perhaps that is the way it is on Planet "Upside-Down".... But this is Earth buddy... grow up and realize what you are saying before you type anything that actually shows your lack of intellegiance. If anything, the "TEXT" is the main concern... but if you look at a little girl in a bikini and you think it is "porn".... that indicates basically that YOU need help.
-I hate stupid people-
Posted by U R retarded on Thu Aug 21, 2008 at 11:32 AM
Just makes me want ice cream. Creamsicles rawk. Yeah, pedophilia is twisted and wrong, but it's funny. Lighten up.
Posted by Bill Vincent on Thu Sep 18, 2008 at 07:29 PM
I think its pretty disgusting to turn a harmless gymnast shot into that. It's probably just satire, but nevertheless, the guy who made it crossed a line.
Posted by N in US on Sat Jan 03, 2009 at 09:53 AM
Page 3 of 3 pages < 1 2 3