‘Lickable’ Breyers Ad
Status: Hoax
You may feel that you need to scrub your eyeballs after seeing this supposed ad for Breyers ice cream, so if you
click on the link don't say I didn't warn you. (The ad is disturbing for what it suggests, not for what it actually shows.) However, the ad definitely isn't real, which is obvious if you read the text on the right-hand side of it. I don't know who created it, but it wasn't Breyers. Unfortunately the image is now circulating around the internet in a reduced size that makes the text hard to read, leading some people to think that it might actually be a real ad.
Posted By: Alex | Date:
Tue May 02, 2006 |
Permalink |
Total Comments: 57
Category:
Advertising,
Gross
Comments
Listed in chronological order. Newest comments at the end.
Page 2 of 3 pages < 1 2 3 >
wow, too many of you don't know an obvious photoshop joke when you see it.
created by a pedophile? highly doubtful.
created by a bored kid with a pirated version of photoshop? almost certainly.
kudos to the maker, thumbs down to the idiots who just won't get it.
Posted by tyler in earth on Tue Mar 27, 2007 at 03:03 PM
well, if it was a bored kid, that is one disturbed bored kid! And if u think that this is in any way funny or consider it a joke at all. Then sumthing is definitely wrong with you.
Whether it was created by a pedophile or not, it is wrong.
Posted by tony in earth on Sun Apr 01, 2007 at 11:46 PM
I found this to be absolutely hilarious, and the creator has gotta be laughing his fresh little ass off at anyone freaking out over it. I'm sure that was basically the intent - to make a satirical point about how people's definition of innocence tends to vary pretty heavily. I'm sure he (or she) wasn't a pedophile, but it's pretty funny how many people jump right to that conclusion. Lickable. God, that's good.
Posted by Oscar in mars on Wed Apr 04, 2007 at 03:16 PM
Haha, I laughed my butt off, thats for sure. Definitely the best photoshop I've ever seen, I totally believed it till I read the fresh ass part. Some people need to lighten up though, just because you can't appreciate a joke doesn't mean its not funny.
Posted by Taeo on Sat Apr 07, 2007 at 07:44 PM
There are a hundred ways to see that picture and a hundred more ways to respond to it. And there is an even bigger number of consequences in the end(no pun ).
I look at those photos and get an instant hard on. Why? Because I dont know those girls and it's only an image. The brain knows they aren't here and knows that it's safe to react normally. When a sexy girl bends over its normal for any guy to get instantly aroused by it. Pre-teen girls can come across sexy if they are dressed for it and posed right. Whether it's right or wrong to be displayed that way is another way of looking at it. Whether its right or wrong to be aroused by it is a bias either way because it's natural to be aroused by an image like that.
Just because the image gives me hard-on, does it mean I would make sexual advances towards a 10 year-old? NO. I have 2 daughters that are that young. Kids don't know any better. They know nothing of sex. They wear nothing and bend over all the time. What do I do about it? I turn away instantly because that's what you do. I know what my instincts are, they are to get aroused by sexual images. It's nothing personal unless you act upon it. Some people have emotional issues and a lot of confusion to make them have sex with young kids. But, that's their issue and not any man's who gets hard from the image. People who are closed minded, especially many religious people, are quick to live in denial over emotional and physiological factors that create arousal. Ultimately it leads to poor judgment that ruins a person's life unjustly. Like all the so-called sex offenders of which a large number of have been done wrong. I have a good friend who is labeled as a sex offender because he had sex with a 15 year old and she wanted it for quite some time. But she got pissed at him and claimed rape. This is a small town where everyone know everything but courts dont care.
It goes to show that many consequences in this world are forced upon us, just because someone else doesn't like the actions of others. If less people were biased it would become more apparent that as a young girl enters her puberty stage, around 12 or so I'm guessing, they become more sexually attractive to most men. That's human nature saying it's about time. But societal values that have been force fed to most mainstream thinkers state that the feelings of a young teen or any man are wrong and that they need emotional help and pills to stop those feelings. For anyone to give in to those fear tactics is a tragedy and a missed opportunity for love, sex, and production of life. No amount of money in this world is worth that kind of opportunity unless you are voluntarily biased, and content.
I believe in what nature says because no matter what anyone does to this world, be it destruction or the raping of the planet, nature doesn't change because it's been programmed with a complex force that we will never gain control of. We'll destroy life before that happens.
Posted by Geno on Fri Jun 08, 2007 at 11:23 PM
Geno, i don't know what the hell is wrong with you but i don't get an insant hard-on when i look at that picture.
i might if they were alot older, alot more developed, and attractive in anyway.
you call them girls. perhaps, but they are first children.
i pray for the safety of your two daughters, physically and mentally.
Posted by russell in america on Sat Jun 23, 2007 at 10:39 PM
You have two daughters..and you get an instant hard on when you see a pre-teen girl bending over?.....
YOU ARE A SICK SOB WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU.....you have to be what atleast 30+ and gettin a boner by lookin at girls? holy crap somoene call 911...i bet this guy videotapes his daughters takin a bath
Posted by Raz on Mon Jul 16, 2007 at 08:25 PM
Posted by russell in america on Sat Jun 23, 2007
Posted by Raz on Mon Jul 16, 2007 at 08:25 PM
YHBT Guys. Did you pay attention to the pic this weblog post is about?
Posted by Anonymous in The Internets on Tue Sep 04, 2007 at 06:15 AM
Something smells like fish.
Posted by poop on Mon Sep 17, 2007 at 05:26 PM
I came across this ad while doing ad research. If I was 14 I may have felt aroused, but at twice that age I actually thought nothing of it. At least I thought nothing of it for a few hours then it started to grow like a cancer on my social conscious, at which point I was disturbed enough to find a better copy and show it to my wife to see if she felt as disturbed. In and of its self there is little wrong with the girls or the pose, the suggestion created by the text becomes disturbing. Perhaps, as some of you suggest, I was disturbed to begin with or pre disposed to find the girls attractive which caused my conscious to conflict with deep animal desires… Perhaps but I think my psyche is better developed and I became disturbed when I felt empathy for the dangerous environment ads like this could potential create. The potential, judging by the responses, however may be so small that criminalization should not be warranted.
That said, I de feel that in truth there are many people who do feel deeply attracted to younger people. However nearly all of them realize it is merely a throw back to a few hundred years ago when you got married at 13 and were dead by 30. General people are looking for love, not mere attraction, and the age difference between even a 22 year old and an 16 year old is often just too great and any interest spurred by primordial desire is rapidly striped away.
I do agree that people become physically mature and sexually interested much earlier then we have set a legal age of consent. And if the age of consent was to be lowered back to where it was when my grand parents got together it would need to be accompanied by a vast change in our social attitude about sex. This parody at least shows us our dark side, not that we want sex with little girls, but that we are so terrified about sex in general. Let’s face it, 14 year olds will have sex with each other. Sex is a very powerful thing and can impart a lot of emotional / psychological good and harm. Thus we should teach our children about sex, that it is powerful, that it can be dangerous, and that it can be wonderful. But instead we shun it, fear it, and are more include to look at raw violence in a favorable (or at least less disturbing) light. If nothing else this parody has made a few of us think, and for that it is good.
As for the ad, it is both disturbing and funny; just like south park.
Posted by Anonymous person of little consequence on Fri Nov 16, 2007 at 11:00 AM
I believe that this is a supreme example of satire.
I find it very entertaining and don't see much wrong with them making tongue in cheek jokes. I'd far rather see this than stripped children not consenting to being touched and/or sexually exploited.
Posted by Zurah in Minnesota on Tue Dec 04, 2007 at 05:43 PM

Oh my GOD, that is hilarious. Hey, if you all didn't have sick, perverted minds, you wouldn't see anything suggestive about that at all. You could show that to a five year old and they wouldn't see anything wrong with it. Obviously the person was making a joke, probably about pedophiles or just the decreasing decorum of American society in general.
Posted by Banana Hannah in Lol town. on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 07:39 AM
Posted by peter in usa on Fri Dec 21, 2007 at 05:53 PM
lol really classic good article
Posted by hot celebrities pictures in USA on Sat Feb 23, 2008 at 12:30 PM
HEY guess what? museumofhoaxes.com hoaxed you all. the actual ad *DOES NOT* have that paragraph where it talks about "busting their sweet asses."
That was added. By this site? I dunno, but the original ad can be seen here:
http://rubbermallet.org/BreyersLickable.jpg
Posted by Mike Chambers in St. Louis, MO on Wed Jun 11, 2008 at 06:46 PM
The parents of the two very young girls should probally have the kids taken away from them. I'm sure the next stop on their daughters show biz careers is most likely child porn. You should be ashamed for using your children in this sexual manner. For all the morans who post comments in favor of the ad, are obiviously not parents. And if they are, they should be!!! Beyers open a can of worms. SHAME ON YOU!!!!!!
Posted by The Mom in New York on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 05:37 PM
This image has not been produced by Breyers, Ice Cream USA, Unilever or any contracted add agency and does not represent the philosophy or interests in the brand and corporate image of the aforementioned. This comes from the cesspool that are chan image boards. The original images are from a child model site, and are in fact a composite image of the same girl from the same photoshoot. It is meant as a joke among the denizens of the chan boards where images of this sort are routine.
Posted by Gargonzola in Vancouver, BC on Sun Jul 27, 2008 at 08:16 PM
a frind of mine e-mailed this ad going "What sick marketing genius thought of this". As shocking and sick this ad was, I thought to myself "Would any modern company really be that stupid? Something so easily misread?" So I checked it up. Glad to see it was just some internet prankester. I don't want to feel like a pedophile everytime I eat Breyers ice cream.
Posted by will on Mon Aug 04, 2008 at 09:44 AM
Ra__ 4 points 12 days ago[+] (0 children)
Ra__ 4 points 12 days ago[-]
UPDATE: Breyers has responded.
Breyers response:
Dear Concerned Consumer, Thank you for contacting us. We want to assure you that this advertisement is a fake and we had absolutely nothing to do with its creation or its posting on the internet. In fact, neither Breyers, Creamsicle nor any of the brands that are part of Unilever Ice Cream had any knowledge of the fake advertisement until it was brought to our attention by our consumers. Please be assured that we are as offended by the fraudulent advertisement as you are and we are making every effort to see that it is removed from the internet as soon as possible. Thank you
/ So don't worry everybody, they are going to see that it's removed from the Internet.
permalinkreply
Posted by paul on Mon Aug 04, 2008 at 01:02 PM
Heh, I thought it was a funny attempt at a fake ad. It got what it aiming for. Shocking looks and uneasy laughs.
Posted by Free Xbox 360 Elite on Wed Aug 06, 2008 at 02:08 AM
Page 2 of 3 pages < 1 2 3 >