The Kitten Killer of Hangzhou
Status: Real (unfortunately)
A series of pictures showing a woman crushing a kitten to death with her stiletto heels is causing an uproar over in China. The pictures first appeared on the internet and have recently been published by some Chinese newspapers. The woman in the photos has been dubbed the Kitten Killer of Hangzhou, because the background scene has been identified as Hangzhou. I've been able to locate four of the pictures in the series, but I think there are a few more (far more graphic) ones. Here are the ones I found (I don't have larger versions):
The big question is: Who is this woman? One theory is that the images come from a Japanese shoe advertisement. Another theory identifies the kitten killer as a "37-year-old woman from Hubei province with the internet identity 'Gainmas.'"
The London Telegraph elaborates:
She had registered a website in Hangzhou and - the ultimate evidence - had bought a pair of stilettoes on eBay last year. She was also registered with QQ, a popular Chinese message service, where she wrote of herself: "I furiously crush everything to do with you and me." Before her QQ address went dead, its owner had several conversations. In one, she is coy, saying "So what?" when asked if the pictures are of her, and then, when asked again, replying: "In theory." When confronted by a reporter, she became defensive, saying: "Suddenly hundreds of people are on my QQ and cursing me. What's the problem if I crush cats? It's a type of experience. You wouldn't understand."
The Telegraph goes on to note:
No one seems to have suggested the serious possibility that the photographs could be a hoax - created by picture-altering computer software. But in the face of tight control of self-expression, young Chinese are seeking wildly different forms of sensation or satire on the state of society.
Without having seen all the pictures (and better quality ones), it's hard to judge whether or not they're real. But it certainly seems like this has already become the Chinese version of
Bonsai Kitten (with the added twist that it may be real... in which case it's definitely disgusting).
Update: A "Crush" video is circulating around (you can find links to it in the comments, if you're interested) that makes it pretty clear the woman really did step on a kitten. Also, an article in the
Shanghai Daily reports that the lady, and the guy who produced the video, have been identified. The producer, who is a camera operator at a TV station, has apologized. However, the woman, who works as a nurse at a hospital, has disappeared, leading to concerns that kitten commandoes may have abducted her (or something along those lines).
Posted By: Alex | Date:
Mon Mar 06, 2006 |
Permalink |
Total Comments: 237
Category:
Animals,
Gross,
Photos/Videos
Comments
Listed in chronological order. Newest comments at the end.
Page 5 of 12 pages « First < 3 4 5 6 7 > Last »
Well Congrats! These people that love to pull off the shock factor has struck again. They do it because one they are twisted, and two because they can get everyone one up in arms. as human nature would have in with our different views on the topics in question and the many cultures, we predictably will turn on each other. while people like this woman sit back an laugh getting off. Don't get me wrong I am an animal lover too, and think people like her really need help or some good meds. However people face it we have sickos everywhere, and they prey on helpless animals and people for that matter. Instead of fighting one another, the various groups like spca and others need support. We need to work together to put cruel predators where they belong...in a cage. Maybe one day this world will be a better place..wishful thinking I know. you all take care and hug your families and yes even your pets.
Posted by Dan.S in Canada on Fri Mar 10, 2006 at 08:43 AM
Am I the only one who sees the difference between eating a hamburger and crushing a domestic animal with high heels?
Here I go. People eat meat. Big deal. No, people do not need meat to survive, beans and nuts have enough protein, but people have eaten meat for forever and the majority will not stop because you argue about it on a thred. Also, this has NOTHING to do with the kitten killer.
Secondly, people are upset about the kitten killer becaus it's the NEEDLESS (and painful) dying of a BABY DOMESTIC animal. It's dying for no apparant reason, that's #1. It's just a baby, that's #2, and #3 is that it is a domestic animal, like what we have in our own homes. It hits close to home. This is not the place to argue about vegetarianism, this is a place to argue about whether this video is a hoax or real.
I havent seen the video/pictures, and I'm not going to because I'm a fourteen year old girl, and I'd be scared out of my mind, but I'm not going to argue about people's choices in diet. I'll leave that to you.
Posted by Dracul on Fri Mar 10, 2006 at 08:48 AM
it's real. I saw the video.
Posted by DC on Fri Mar 10, 2006 at 11:39 AM
We can spend our entire lives discussing and arguing and debating the morality of killing animals, and we'll never reach any sort of an agreement. The morality of something depends on each person's individual morals, and there are so many different moral ideologies.
What can potentially be resolved is how genuine this woman's stunt was. Since there is apparently a video as well as the pictures, I doubt that the images have been manipulated to make it appear that she was stepping on the kitten when she really wasn't. Doing that sort of fakery convincingly to photographs is hard enough; going back and editing the images in a video would be a major effort.
So I think that the woman is indeed actually stepping on something. That leaves the question of what she's stepping on. Is it a real, live kitten? Is it a dead kitten? Or is it a fake kitten?
Posted by Accipiter in the Northern Hemisphere, unless They have lied. on Fri Mar 10, 2006 at 12:20 PM
The video is real and it s disgusting. It s animal snuff, really sick stuff. This woman has a mental problem, there s no other way of describing these cruelties that got caught on video. Problem is: I got a mental problem now, too, because I was watching that sick crap and cannot get rid of those pictures in my head.
I would say it s not a trick, definetly not digitally manipulated (way too much effort and too perfectly real for a digital illusion anyway), but probably the cat is whether heavily sedated or already dead, as it doesn t try to run away and/or makes any visible effort of resistance against what that woman is doing. The sound got probably dubbed in afterwards. At least I hope so.
The argumentation that animals are getting killed for food, too, is in my opinion not in any way appropriate, as there s a main difference if something gets killed for food or if something gets killed for fun and for the enjoyment of gruesome cruelty against a (maybe) living creature. Even if for example animals are getting killed for the skin (leather for shoes or whatever) there s no real sense in inappropriate cruelty against the animal.
On the other side (I m shooting my own leg now): football is fun for a lot of people and the ball is made out of leather. So the animal that got killed for producing the football also got killed "for fun".
...maybe it s the wrong place to discuss something like this.
Ain t it a crazy thing that china is censoring western websites and on the other side there s stuff like this swapping into the web from china? Maybe china shouldn t censor the western websites but western websites should censor chinese ones. First time ever that I m thinking of something like this. It s sick sick sick...
Posted by aeiou in Rio de Janeiro on Fri Mar 10, 2006 at 02:24 PM
I agree that if it is real, it is disgusting.
Yet I wonder too if all this noise had been raised if it had been a cockroach instead of a kitten.
Posted by LaMa in Europe on Sat Mar 11, 2006 at 07:50 AM
"So I think that the woman is indeed actually stepping on something. That leaves the question of what she's stepping on. Is it a real, live kitten? Is it a dead kitten? Or is it a fake kitten?"
I have to agree with Acci. Also, I mentioned before I'm allergic to dead animals. When my Guinea Pig died, it would have been left in it's cage for a week before my husband came home from a training trip. Luckily (for me) my sister & her boyfriend were visiting & were able to dig a hole & stick the thing inside. I don't mind animals dying...and I even helped kill a rooster (to eat). There's just something about their dull eyes, limp bodies...ICK.
I would be just as grossed out by a human body as an animal being squished to death.
And LaMa...cockroaches don't really make noise while being crushed - but *I* personally would be grossed out by a yucky squished body with guts coming out of it. If I knew it was just crushed & could not see it - I would not be upset at all.
Posted by Maegan in Tampa, FL - USA on Sun Mar 12, 2006 at 07:57 AM
Recently a video like this was all over the aussie news it was called "the art of killing a cat" & dipicted a can being skinned alive", although i havent seen either videos & dont plan to i really think it is WRONG & especialy wrong to do it for sexual pleasure
i do eat meat & enjoy it but i am really againts cruelety to animals of any kind
Posted by Samemo in Australia on Mon Mar 13, 2006 at 03:17 AM
ok, that was the most disgusting thing i've ever seen. i watched it until the end because i actually didn't realise what was going on, i had the sound turned off.
my two cents to the moral-discussion: a lot of posters have mixed up something here. it's not about killing a animal, it's a about torturing an animal to death. if you don't see the difference - well go fuck yourself, heartless piece of shit.
but now for something completely different:
i can't go to sleep until i really know if it's fake or real.
something is clear: a normal, healthy cat wouldn't react like this. it would try to escape. the cat in the video doesn't - the quesion is why.
some have assumed that the cat is on some sedatives (or perhaps on drugs). that was also the first thing coming in my mind. other assumed the cat to be already dead. but then, how do you explain the cats moves.
in fact, the movement of the cat looks very strange. this brought an other horrible consideration to my mind. look closely at the legs at the beginning of the movie, when the women carries the cat. they look very unnatural.
i have absolutley no idea abot anatomy - but could it be possible to break some specific bones to circumvent that the cat can flee? do you understand my question, my englist is very bad, sorry. i would be very happy if someone could give me an answer.
i really hope my speculations are wrong - if not, it would be even more horrible. i really hope, the cat was sedated.
also strange are the eyes of the cat, they look like the eyes of a dead cat to me. and the sound is odd too, sounds like overdubbed.
some 'experts' should take care of this, i really need to now the truth.
Posted by mike on Mon Mar 13, 2006 at 04:40 PM
i've forgotten something unusual: i've noticed some short cuts in the beginning of the movie. perhaps there are more, i don't know, and i don't want to see that shit a second time.
Posted by mike on Mon Mar 13, 2006 at 04:44 PM
the cat-killer has been identified.
but she has disappeared, i hope some fanatic animal lovers took care of her.
i really must admin, that i wouldn't wait one second to give a headshot, if i had the chance to.
may sound hard. but it's indeed ethically acceptable, as it isn't possible to punish her because china hasn't any animal protection rights.
well whatever, read this:
http://www.shanghaidaily.com/art/2006/03/11/248818/Cat_stomper_found_to_be_nurse.htm
Posted by mike on Mon Mar 13, 2006 at 05:13 PM
Has she really "disappeared" or is psycho-bitch just laying low to weather out the shit storm she created. There is a fine delineation between these two phrases (disappeared juxtaposed lay low). In any event, I will post $US10, 000 for information leading to her whereabouts (if in China). Have some associates in that part of the world that would like to converse with the women.
Posted by The Major on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 02:35 AM
Sorry, I've gone from "That's sick!" to "So what?" in under five pages.
Personally, I don't give a f**k if she stomped a real cat or not. If the typical 'righteous indignation' hypocrites are offended, well so what?
Posted by David B. on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 05:57 AM
>I will post $US10, 000 for information leading to her whereabouts (if in China).
It's sh*ts like this we need less of.
Posted by David B. on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 05:59 AM
"I will post $US10, 000 for information leading to her whereabouts (if in China). Have some associates in that part of the world that would like to converse with the women."
An act like this is just continuing this shit in the same way it started. Probably this woman also got some thousands to act in the video. Now you want to give some thousands to someone to find her to send someone to "talk" to her. Afterwards her lover gives some thousands to someone to get you killed. Then an upset crowd of american tourists will have a demonstration in Peking against chinese contract killers and cruelty against cats. Then the chinese authorities will send some tanks to crush them. Somebody will take a video of that and sell it to a video company in afghanistan that will sell the shit worldwide as an act of political propaganda. USA will then already have started to throw bombs onto China, because they ve crushed those american tourists...and all that shit because someone stepped on a cat. I don t want that.
The video is sick-sick-sick, but hey: calm down. You don t need to get no f***ing contract killer, you know?
Repeat slowly: calm blue ocean, calm blue ocean, calm blue ocean ...
Posted by aeiou in Rio de Janeiro on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 09:43 AM
one thing is clear:
the crush video scene is involved in the threads about the catkiller, and tries do calm down people.
they want relativize the case, like ('uuuh, what's so hard? western civilization kills animals all the time; don't we all eat meat?; there's much more cruel things going on,; etc. - you know it).
of course, those people don't tell you that they're from the crush video scene.
but it's obvious; David B. and the rest of you, fuck you, and go to hell.
Posted by mike on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 11:32 AM
aeiou: what else should we do, besides calming down?
Posted by mike on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 11:57 AM
Careful 'mike', I've got a mind-control ray and I'm not afraid to use it.
Posted by David B. on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 02:29 PM
@mike:
"the crush video scene is involved in the threads about the catkiller, and tries do calm down people."
"aeiou: what else should we do, besides calming down?"
...if you intend to connect me to any weird crush video scene, then please read the posts that I been writing right after I ve seen that sick video.
What else should we do? I f***ing don t know. Am I god or what!? I don t see any sense in personal revenge, like that guy who wanted to pay 10000USD to find that woman and then send some "friends" over to "talk" to her. If someone finds enjoyment in doing or watching shit like this that person should be taken care of in legal ways. If there s no laws against cruelty against pets then it s time for some pressure of some animal rights movement. maybe this video even can do something good by convincing people to join something like peta for example. any coin has it s good and it s bad side.
BTW: When I was a little child some kids in my age I knew thought it was cool to catch flies to tore off their wings and then watch it crawling over the table. I thought it was gruesome but it s actually the same thing. Only that a kitten looks more cute.
Posted by aeiou in Rio de Janeiro on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 03:09 PM
aeiou: sorry, i didn't mean to connect YOU to the crush video scene.
to torture a fly is not the same like to torture a cut. and the difference is not only, that a cat looks more cute to us. the nervous system of a cat is much more complex, so a cat can receive much more pain than a fly. it's important to see this difference.
still, torturing a fly for no other reason than the 'fun of turture' is unacceptable.
i agree with you, that 'personal revenge' is in fact a very problematic thing. still, as china doesn't have animal rights, it's ethically acceptable to 'make it on your own'.
still, i agree with you, that 'pressuring china to get some animal rights' is far more intelligent.
and that's what's actually happening.
Posted by mike on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 04:02 PM
Page 5 of 12 pages « First < 3 4 5 6 7 > Last »
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.