AtomChip Notebook Computer

You may never have heard of the
Atom Chip Corporation before, but you will if they've really built what they claim to have built--a notebook computer that boasts a 6.8GHZ CPU and 2TB of non-volatile Quantum Storage (in place of a hard disk). For those who aren't tech savvy, a notebook computer like this would be years ahead of anything else on the market. The company says that it will present this miracle technology to the world during an upcoming Consumer Electronics Show. However, the pictures it has on its website look strangely amateurish, like pieces of computer hardware glued together. The liberal use of the word "quantum" in its description is also a clue that this thing is totally bogus.
The Register states that it's a "trifle sceptical" of the company's claims.
Posted By: Alex | Date:
Wed Sep 07, 2005 |
Permalink |
Total Comments: 86
Category:
Technology
Comments
Listed in chronological order. Newest comments at the end.
Page 1 of 5 pages 1 2 3 > Last »
(fine print) 'Lap must be ninety-three inches wide'
While 6.8 Ghz is *just* attainable with current technology, and it would almost certainly be *possible* to make a Terabyte flash chip (probably about the size of a pizza box if you do it the easy way...), the cost would be insane. Given the speed of technological advances, it will probably take about ten years for something like that to become available to the general public at a cost that doesn't reflect the GNP of a small nation.
Sounds like an investor trap to me.. Put up a concept that sounds real enough to those who have heard just enough buzzwords to be dangerous, then rake in the money.
Quantum computing is, at this point, totally theoretical, and moreover, scares the willies out of respectable physicists. Seems it may be possible to get signal noise from alternate dimensions with quantum components. Also, a quantum computer wouldn't necessarily be any faster than its current counterpart. It *would* be capable of massive parallel processing, though.
Posted by Bobcat on Wed Sep 07, 2005 at 09:58 PM
I've got it! I know how they've managed these incredible technological breakthroughs. It's obvious that they put LifeWave patches directly on the processors. Those small adhesive plastic patches can improve ANYTHING!
Posted by Cranky Media Guy on Wed Sep 07, 2005 at 11:13 PM
What the hell would anyone need a terabyte for?
Posted by Citizen Premier in spite of public outcry on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 04:45 AM
for such a high tech operation their web site seems pretty crappy. They do have a listing on the CES website which does indicate they have secured a booth at the Jan. 2006 con in Las Vegas as well as listing phone numbers/addresses/company officials and products they intend to display. I, like The Register, remain a trifle skeptical and will discount the companies claims until Jan. 2006.
Citizen, one immediate use for that amount of storage would be in todays high end security DVR's, many of which are expandable to the TB region however this is only through using multiple drives.
Posted by Chuck in Rhode Island on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 05:13 AM
I agree about the website - pretty nasty. Plus there is a whole lot of Photoshopping going on. For instance, anything that says, "Quantum," in an image is Photoshop. I suspect a hoax.
Posted by bored serf in vitro on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 05:19 AM
Am I the only one who thinks that their picture of the insides of the "AtomChip® Quantum® II processor" looks like a CD-ROM laser carrier?
Posted by azog on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 06:03 AM
Advances in comuter technology, although constant, are never huge like this. I suspect its bogus.
I've been to the Consumer Electonics Show and computers don't draw that much attention. We expect this year's will be better than last year's so there's no surprises. The biggest draw seems to be car stereo systems. I'm not sure why. Maybe it's the poster girls signing autographs that makes it that way.
A close second for popularity is the Porn Convention that takes place downstairs at the same time. They also have their people signing autographs.
Posted by Captain Al in Alberta, Canada on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 07:17 AM
If you still think this is real check this out:
http://atomchip.com/_wsn/page3.html
On that page they show a headphone jack and try to convince you that it's computer stoarge.
Posted by Dean in Fairhope AL on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 07:22 AM
Posted by swangelok on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 09:34 AM
there is NO DOUBT this is a hoax LOL!!!!!!!
HILARIOUS!
Posted by No Doubt on Fri Sep 09, 2005 at 12:18 AM
I would KILL for 1TB of hard drive space... no, really.
This is so obviously a hoax it's not funny. 6GHz? Come on... we're already pushing the boundries of our current CPU technology (consumer level, ie Intel and AMD off-the-shelf stuff) as it is, this just isn't possible. Even if by some miracle it was, the heat generated would be huge, and to then cram it inside a notebook?! You've got to be kidding...
Posted by Soldant on Fri Sep 09, 2005 at 02:32 AM
Man, they could've done a better job on the CPU, I mean come on, a CDROM Laser??? I mean, buy some old computer parts and stereo mini plugs and call them memory?
Pay the patent fee and they'll give a patent to anyone who takes the time to obfuscate a fake design. Sigh...
Posted by Shockie on Fri Sep 09, 2005 at 04:08 AM
Somebody asked what you could use this for. Well, extreme simulations on a laptop that you would only need if you worked for an "agency" or Los Alamos, or if you (like me) are a mad software developer who likes the idea of running massive data warehouses in terabytes of memory instead of slow hard drives. I had a look at
http://www.atomchip.org instead and concluded that the laptop must be a hoax. However, other research I have done in the field informs me that by 2012, most enterprise storage will be hologram drive based, or based on the real implementation of NvIOpSRAM, among other rivalling technologies. It would appear the speed I need today for large dataset analysis is just a few years away. Unfortunatley by then, my datasets would have grown exponentially and even a quantum computer wouldn't be enough :(
Posted by RagingInsanity in England on Fri Sep 09, 2005 at 08:20 AM
Alright, time to shed some light...
First, this website looks like a fledgling company that doesn't have a dedicated webmaster. Seen that more than a few times. Forget the website, it isn't as important as some of you think. Even the headphone hookup doesn't look like a fake as that is simply improvising a new technology out of something old (which isn't such a bad idea).
As for the technology itself, frankly it wouldn't surprise me. To date, at least 3 large firms are openly working on building a quantum processor. They have been since the early- to mid-90s. Who are they? HP(and this may be the real reason that the R&D was hit so hard recently at HP), MIT, and (as far as I can remember, although my memory may be a little flawed) a joint venture of EDS and others. Just read Michael Crichton's book "Timeline" and check the credits. He did his research to write a story based on technology that is "coming soon". As for those that are working in secret? Could be hundreds. The first to have an off-the-shelf, operating quantum processor is going to control the world. Here's a list of reasons:
1. Because of the differences in the processors, your average 1GHz quantum processor would be equal in speed to today's processors running at 10GHz. Why? QuBits. Today's current processor has only two states, on and off, for each transistor. A quantum processor has the equivalent of 4 transistors to each bit (hence QuBit) allowing for a multitude of on/off states and combinations. This allows for processing several orders of magnitude faster than current processing technology.
2. Because of the reason stated above, all current encryption technology would be rendered useless. What good is an encryption that takes a normal computer 20 years to break if a quantum computer can do it in seconds? Scary thought for you there, huh? (it sure scares the crap out of me!)
3. Memory density is getting amazingly high as of late. Of note, the HVD (holographic virtual disc) which is purported (and somewhat verified) to store 1 terabyte of data on a single CD sized disc. See the following links:
http://www.gizmag.com/go/3661/
http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/peripherals/something-holographic-this-way-comes-115592.php
http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/peripherals/optware-holographic-30gb-card-107434.php
The last link is to the credit card sized storage disc that stores 30GB each, with each card costing only $1. The drive costs $1800, which if added up makes for one heck of a deal. For roughly $5000, one could put together a multidisc(CD like) storage system with a total capacity of 96 terabytes. Spend over $20,000 and you could have yourself an exabyte of storage on quick reading, quick writing, removable cards.
If you haven't been paying attention to technology, then everything I have said here should scare the crap out of you. Best part? It is all verifiable from numerous sources, including the companies themselves.
Posted by Techie on Fri Sep 09, 2005 at 08:20 AM
How many of you do read the technical sheet before giving their opinion? We are not talking about existing technology. They are using LIGHT. Not electricity. Light doesn't heat. Great advantage. And it goes faster than electricity. Then, the memory is holographic. It means that they are exploiting the 3 dimensions, unlike any other memory device (HD included). That makes sens for me. And they have been at the CES for 3 years. That's something...
Posted by Yannick Dufour in Canada on Fri Sep 09, 2005 at 03:58 PM
Yannick, I live in southern Arizona and I know for a fact that light does heat. I live through it every summer. (But it's a dry heat - especially with the drought.) Plus, heat is electromagnetic radiation in the infrared spectrum, right next to the visible light spectrum.
As far as the specs on this computer and so forth, being out of electronics for about 20 years, I can't offer an educated opinion. However, nothing I've seen in the printed specs would surprise me.
Posted by Christopher Cole in Tucson, AZ on Fri Sep 09, 2005 at 06:23 PM
If you guys can't tell that this is so obviously a fake you really need to STFU right now, and quit embarrassing yourselves. In fact some of you are cracking me up even more than the website

Posted by Shockie on Sat Sep 10, 2005 at 01:40 AM
1. This company has already been at previous CES and has won a award there for similar technology, including a 4Ghz optical processor and 256GB diskless storage (from the CES website)
2. The technology used in the storage (according to patents that already date back to 1998) is magneto-optical they use light (a single photon wich is also called a quantum of light BTW) to set and read magnetical properties of the storage material wich means their storage cells are actually only a few nanometers wide. That company has also already sold pattents to IBM (one of the few companies in the world that owns microprocessor facilities)
3. The jack you can see on one page is actually an optical jack, a very efficient way of transferring data.
Posted by Seb64 on Sat Sep 10, 2005 at 04:59 AM
come on people, we would ave heard all about this on the internet by now. And alove the media.
Posted by derek in CA on Sun Sep 11, 2005 at 02:33 PM
HAHA, this is sooo retarded, LOL, look at this picture (specificly the part that says 512GB)
Posted by Bob on Sun Sep 11, 2005 at 08:01 PM
Page 1 of 5 pages 1 2 3 > Last »