Recent Forum Posts
| • | Mutant Nuclear Spider? 02/06/2012 |
| • | The Glorious Deception 02/04/2012 |
| • | Prank by Vermont inmates adorns decals 02/03/2012 |
| • | Rolling Stone article - One town's war on g a y teens 02/03/2012 |
| • | Russian Drill Nears 14-Million-Year-Old Antarctic Lake 02/02/2012 |
| • | Don't wash your jeans? 02/02/2012 |
| • | ****** Microsoft 02/02/2012 |
| • | Dutch mentally handicapped children loose their savings in bankruptcy scandal 02/01/2012 |
| • | 31 january 1961: Ham the first Mercury astronaut 01/31/2012 |
| • | More weird stuff from the sky 01/29/2012 |
Site Map
Blog Categories
Animals |
Crop Circles |
Advertising |
April Fools Day |
Art |
Birth/Babies |
Body Manipulation |
Business/Finance |
Celebrities |
Con Artists |
Conspiracy Theories |
Cryptozoology |
Nessie |
Death |
eBay |
Email Hoaxes |
Entertainment |
Exploration/Travel |
Extraterrestrial Life |
Food |
Free Energy |
Future/Time |
Gross |
Hate Crimes/Terror |
History |
Identity/Imposters |
Technology |
Journalism |
Law/Police/Crime |
Literature/Language |
Mass Delusion |
Health/Medicine |
Military |
Miscellaneous |
Photos/Videos |
Places |
Politics |
Pranks |
Psychology |
Radio |
Religion |
Science |
Sex/Romance |
Sports |
Paranormal |
Tall Tales |
Websites |
Fashion |
Gnomes |
Urban Legends |
Music |
Pareidolia |
Scams |
Bad Excuses |
Products |
Books |
Pseudoscience |
Social Networking Sites |
Videos |
Education |
Magic |
Celebrations
Blog Archives
January, 2012 |
December, 2011 |
November, 2011 |
October, 2011 |
September, 2011 |
August, 2011 |
November, 2010 |
April, 2010 |
January, 2010 |
December, 2009 |
November, 2009 |
October, 2009 |
September, 2009 |
August, 2009 |
July, 2009 |
June, 2009 |
May, 2009 |
April, 2009 |
March, 2009 |
February, 2009 |
January, 2009 |
December, 2008 |
November, 2008 |
October, 2008 |
September, 2008 |
August, 2008 |
July, 2008 |
June, 2008 |
May, 2008 |
April, 2008 |
March, 2008 |
February, 2008 |
January, 2008 |
December, 2007 |
November, 2007 |
October, 2007 |
September, 2007 |
August, 2007 |
July, 2007 |
June, 2007 |
May, 2007 |
April, 2007 |
March, 2007 |
February, 2007 |
January, 2007 |
December, 2006 |
November, 2006 |
October, 2006 |
September, 2006 |
August, 2006 |
July, 2006 |
June, 2006 |
May, 2006 |
April, 2006 |
March, 2006 |
February, 2006 |
January, 2006 |
December, 2005 |
November, 2005 |
October, 2005 |
September, 2005 |
August, 2005 |
July, 2005 |
June, 2005 |
May, 2005 |
April, 2005 |
March, 2005 |
February, 2005 |
January, 2005 |
December, 2004 |
November, 2004 |
October, 2004 |
September, 2004 |
August, 2004 |
July, 2004 |
June, 2004 |
May, 2004 |
April, 2004 |
March, 2004 |
February, 2004 |
January, 2004 |
December, 2003 |
November, 2003 |
October, 2003 |
September, 2003 |
August, 2003 |
July, 2003 |
June, 2003 |
May, 2003 |
January, 2003 |
November, 2002 |
October, 2002 |
September, 2002 |
August, 2002 |
July, 2002 |
Tall-Tale Aviation Photo
Richard has written in with a question about the photograph (to the right) that's being sold as a print by The New York Times. It shows the sky above Portland, Oregon filled with biplanes. It was taken in 1920 by the photographer C.S. Woodruff. Richard questions whether the picture can possibly be real, and I think he's right to do so. First of all, the biplanes seem dangerously close to each other, all clustered together in a swarm. Second, by 1920 there were hundreds of biplanes and trained pilots in the U.S. But what would they have been doing all gathered together in Portland? Could one city have produced that many pilots and planes in 1920? Probably not. Finally, if you look at a larger version of the picture, it's pretty obvious that it's the same biplane pasted into the photo numerous times. In other words, this is a tall-tale photo. Such photos were all the rage in the early twentieth century. A sky filled with planes must have seemed like a fairly farfetched concept to people in 1920.
|
Categories: Photos/Videos Posted by Alex on Sun Feb 01, 2004 |
Comments (3) |
This photo, by Corbis.com is used by the New York Times in their sale of historical photos and can be presumed by purchasers as an historical fact. The position of the planes makes it a physically impossible event.
My letters to them(both Corbis.com and the NYT's) calling their attention to this fakery and false reporting go unanswered.
Posted by william woudenberg on Sun Feb 01, 2004 at 02:06 PM
My letters to them(both Corbis.com and the NYT's) calling their attention to this fakery and false reporting go unanswered.
Yep, half the planes are identical, and the other half are mirror images. Then there are the tiny identical sideview planes scattered in between. Everthing's equally spaced with no overlap -- a poorly layed out cut-and-paste job.
Posted by Ed in PA on Mon Feb 02, 2004 at 12:05 PM
This is one pathetic photo. It's obvious how alike the planes are and how weird it looks the way some are facing the other direction. Stupid.
Posted by Peter in Michigan on Wed Feb 11, 2004 at 05:15 PM
Comments: Page 1 of 1 pages








