Batman’s Greatest Boner
A series of scans has appeared on the scans_daily LiveJournal blog, apparently from an early Batman comic (Batman #66). It details a 'boner' made by the Joker, and his subsequent efforts to force Batman 'into a boner'. The word boner is repeated so often that it seems like it has to be a joke, especially when you read lines such as "Gotham City will rue the day it mentioned the word Boner!" Perhaps someone photoshopped the word 'boner' into an issue of Batman. But I don't think so. I think it's real, although I can't be sure since I don't have a copy of that particular Batman comic (in fact, I don't have any Batman comics). The cover of that issue can be seen here. It's titled 'The Joker's Comedy of Errors!' So the issue itself is real, and 'boner' can mean an error. I think that it's only in recent decades that boner has come to predominantly refer to something else.Another thing... in one of the panels a newspaper headline reads "Wrong-Way Batman! Lawman Aims For California, Winds Up In England!" This is a reference to Wrong-Way Corrigan, an aviator who wanted to fly solo from New York to Dublin but wasn't given permission to do so. So on July 17, 1938 he took off for California and 'accidentally' went the wrong-way and ended up in Ireland.
Posted By: Alex | Date: Sat Mar 05, 2005 | Permalink |
Total Comments: 49
Category: Art, Literature/Language
Category: Art, Literature/Language
Listed in chronological order. Newest comments at the end.
Page 1 of 3 pages 1 2 3 >
Last frame: "Let's hope we've the last of things like boners -- and jokers!"
This actually a really bad typo, especially given that older publications tend to have fewer typos.
It looks like a classic typing typo, where you just totally forget to type word because you've already thought it.
It definitely doesn't look like the kind of typo you commit when inking.
Posted by Typo might hold a clue in here on Sat Mar 05, 2005 at 07:05 PM
This actually a really bad typo, especially given that older publications tend to have fewer typos.
It looks like a classic typing typo, where you just totally forget to type word because you've already thought it.
It definitely doesn't look like the kind of typo you commit when inking.
The really scary part is, the art is by a guy named Dick Sprang. I pull you not. Look it up.
Posted by Hairy Houdini on Sat Mar 05, 2005 at 07:15 PM
Typo,
That's not ungrammatical if "we've" is a contraction of "we have," and therefore not necessarily a typo.
Posted by John in Seattle on Sat Mar 05, 2005 at 07:16 PM
That's not ungrammatical if "we've" is a contraction of "we have," and therefore not necessarily a typo.
Doubt me not. I'm an expert on Bat-Trivia, and Boner is my middle name.
Posted by Hairy Houdini on Sat Mar 05, 2005 at 07:19 PM
Just to confirm the etymology, from c.1912 "boner" referred to a blunder. From the 1950's it took on the meaning of an erect penis.
Posted by Pixie in Germany on Sat Mar 05, 2005 at 07:21 PM
Actually, my middle name is Heinrich, but my confirmation name is Boner, after Saint Bonerface.
Posted by Hairy Houdini on Sat Mar 05, 2005 at 07:23 PM
I remember at school giggling over Jane Austin's heroines when we found out that they loved "balls", or when we discovered that the main hero and lover was infact "gay".
Posted by Pixie in Germany on Sat Mar 05, 2005 at 07:25 PM
I recall an urban legend regarding Johnny Carson, who asked Mrs. Arnold Palmer how she helps Arnie prepare for golf. "I kiss his balls", she said. "Bet that makes his putter stand up", said JC.
Posted by Hairy Houdini on Sat Mar 05, 2005 at 07:37 PM
http://www.comicbookgirl.com/
http://www.redshirt.co.uk/media/batman/
Two other sites reference the "scans".
I'm bothered by this one. It looks like a hoax. Three separate sites, with no attribution, start showing the same thing at the same time?
I don't buy it.
Anyone know where I can find a Batman 66?
Posted by Typo might hold a clue in here on Sat Mar 05, 2005 at 07:40 PM
http://www.redshirt.co.uk/media/batman/
Two other sites reference the "scans".
I'm bothered by this one. It looks like a hoax. Three separate sites, with no attribution, start showing the same thing at the same time?
I don't buy it.
Anyone know where I can find a Batman 66?
I'm pretty sure that the scans are real. Expect more BatMan-ia as the Batman Begins film aproaches. It makes all my old Batman comics worth more, thanks.
Posted by Hairy Houdini on Sat Mar 05, 2005 at 07:47 PM
ha, ha, ha, I just can't stop laughing at this. I suspect that this piece has been Photoshopped with a superflous amount of boners, though. I mean it reads like the way the Smurfs used to talk, when some form of 'smurf' was used every few words.
"Holy Boner, Batman that boner Joker's up to no good! He's making boners all over Gotham & soon we'll all be bonered!"
Even though they've only posted the parts containing 'boner' it's still awfully repetive for one comic book. But so funny, I lovesit!
Posted by Electra on Sat Mar 05, 2005 at 07:50 PM
"Holy Boner, Batman that boner Joker's up to no good! He's making boners all over Gotham & soon we'll all be bonered!"
Even though they've only posted the parts containing 'boner' it's still awfully repetive for one comic book. But so funny, I lovesit!
The other possibility is that this is some retarded "All Your Base Are Belong to Us" joke.
The joke is essentially real, but just some jackass found more humor in the slush pile of things forgeotten than he should have.
Posted by All your base are belong to us on Sat Mar 05, 2005 at 08:07 PM
The joke is essentially real, but just some jackass found more humor in the slush pile of things forgeotten than he should have.
Here's a link to a seller of Batman #66, Typo. Hope you've got $1850.00 Amurrican. http://pages.metropoliscomics.com/365/PictPage/1921158771.html
Posted by Hairy Houdini on Sat Mar 05, 2005 at 08:15 PM
I can't believe nobody's said "Bat-Boner" yet. Quick, Dick, to the Bat-Pole. Grab hard, and slide on down. Seduction of The Innocents, indeed. (look it up, you ignorant fools)
Posted by Hairy Houdini on Sat Mar 05, 2005 at 08:21 PM
It's real. I don't have the issue, but a few people who did talked about it on a Comics bbs some time back. (Pulling a boner being a perfectly valid, if rather clunkily used, slang term to make this issue seem 'with it')
YES, it's used in all those shots. It's not a mistake. I don't know who is the progenitor of these scans, tho.
Posted by M. Smith on Sat Mar 05, 2005 at 08:48 PM
YES, it's used in all those shots. It's not a mistake. I don't know who is the progenitor of these scans, tho.
Hairy Houdini said:
"Seduction of The Innocents, indeed. (look it up, you ignorant fools)"
Great reference, Hairy. Yes, comic books were the Internet of the 1950's, at least in terms of how they were going to ruin the youth of America. Gee, we're a fragile little nation, aren't we?
Posted by Cranky Media Guy on Sun Mar 06, 2005 at 01:14 AM
"Seduction of The Innocents, indeed. (look it up, you ignorant fools)"
Great reference, Hairy. Yes, comic books were the Internet of the 1950's, at least in terms of how they were going to ruin the youth of America. Gee, we're a fragile little nation, aren't we?
this boner thing reminds me of a simpsons episode that I was confused by until now, Homer was telling Bart how he had 'pulled a few boners' in his time. Now it all makes sense...
the only site I could find with this quote in was - http://ftp.shugg.net/scripts/Simpsons/episodes/7g07
it's at the begginning of the script underneath all the 'didja notices etc or very near to the bottom (that one is quicker to find)
Posted by thunder in England on Sun Mar 06, 2005 at 06:27 AM
the only site I could find with this quote in was - http://ftp.shugg.net/scripts/Simpsons/episodes/7g07
it's at the begginning of the script underneath all the 'didja notices etc or very near to the bottom (that one is quicker to find)
...I checked my comics...not a single one from '66. I have a "best of" type novella, but it was written in '65...before this would have come out.
Posted by Maegan in Tampa, FL - USA on Sun Mar 06, 2005 at 08:13 AM
It's not 1966. It's issue #66. I don't know what year that would make it, but almost definitely earlier than 1966.
Posted by Alex in San Diego on Sun Mar 06, 2005 at 08:27 AM
Well, Batman first appeared in Detective Comics in 38 or 39, I think. The Batman Mag began in 1940 or so. At 12 issues a year, my guess is that BM #66 was printed in 1945-46. You're welcome.
Posted by Hairy Houdini on Sun Mar 06, 2005 at 08:52 AM
Page 1 of 3 pages 1 2 3 >