Funny T-Shirts

Exploding Golf Balls
Blows up in a cloud of powder!

...what I was implying w/ my comment was that there are hundreds of kids that will end up like this little girl that will be shot out into the world at 18, corrupting anyone they come into contact with. Think of it like this. If you have a glass of plain water, and a glass of water that has been colored red, and you pour a little of the plain water into the red water...you still have red water. (My daughter's [assumed] goodness may slightly dilute the red water, but it will never turn the red water clear.) If the red water was poured into the clear glass...you will end up with 2 glasses of red water. (So, the red glass colored the clear glass, and not the other way around...)

I can partly control the environment my child will be in while in the highschool years...once she's 18 she can either chuck out everything I taught her...or keep going w/ it. It's up to her...assuming I've taught her well enough, she'll be glad to continue being honest & good. Parents like the ones in this article show that no matter how well mannered my child is...she will never turn a red glass clear again.

Well, I just wanted to put in my two cents. I live like 15 minutes away from where this girl lives and as a "neighbor" I was quite excited to hear that someone so talented existed so close to home. I'm not 100% sure that her father helps her though, I guess I'm holding onto a small twinge of hope that maybe something so cool isn't corrupt. But then again, this is a crazy, crazy world we live in.

with the whole thing about people thinking the dad finishes marla's paintings, i think thats just unreasonable. marlas dad is an artist, yes, which means that he knows what it would feel like for someone to either work on one of his paintings or for them to be given the credit for it. No artist wants the credit taken from them, and no artist wants someone else coming in and changing what they've worked so hard on. Since he is an artist, i highly doubt he is going to put his own daughter through that. Besides, why would he paint them or finish them and then put her name on it? Is the only reason they're getting attention is becase a 4 year old did them? If they were the product of the fathers work, then he should have no problem selling them on his own without adding his daughters name to it. Also, i saw the thing on 60 min. why does it prove that she didnt paint the rest? of course its different then other ones she's painted. they're all different. They're all at different stages. Look at the one titled winding road. its just a white line, yet apparently thats good modern art and finished, why is the one she did on the show 'unfinished'. And monster, it doesnt looked finished to me. Also, why does a prodigy have to have this energy and huge urge to paint like what the 'expert' said? She paints more than any child i know, and she obviously thinks in a very different way, so just because she's not jumping around everywhere and getting all excited when she's painting doesnt prove to me that she's not a prodigy. come on, she's four, well, almost 6 now i think. For me, you dont have to be excited to be a prodigy, just good. I have a friend who is brilliant on the piano, but he doesnt like to play. does that mean he's not an artist, not a good pianist because he's not excited to do it? i dont think so. its not the feeling toward the art, its the product, in my mind. sorry this was such a long rant. i didnt think it would be this long. well, at least i got everything out. thanx.

Well Tess,
It's comforting to know that his "morals" as an artist would prevent him from ever conducting fradulent activities as some of us have suspected. These artistic morals to which you refer must be the reason that there's NEVER been fraud committed by the art community or to the art community right? You asked..."Since he is an artist, i highly doubt he is going to put his own daughter through that. Besides, why would he paint them or finish them and then put her name on it?" The answer... MONEY. His work has repeatedly been turned down, do the works get extra consideration because they were painted by a small child? Of course, everyone when hearing that takes it into consideration. If it didn't make a difference then we would never even know it was done by a child would we? It's called marketing. Are you so naive as to think, as you put it... "marlas dad is an artist, yes, which means that he knows what it would feel like for someone to either work on one of his paintings or for them to be given the credit for it. No artist wants the credit taken from them, and no artist wants someone else coming in and changing what they've worked so hard on. Since he is an artist, i highly doubt he is going to put his own daughter through that." Oh please, people have been taking advantage of their children and their abilities since the dawn of recorded history and MUCH worse... read all the article about this story. The father has been trying to sell his work to no avail for some time, putting a 4 year old's name on it definately would change someone's outlook / opinion of the piece. If you really are this naive as to think this is beyond artist / human capabilities then you should get ahold of Big Gary C... he has a bridge he wants to talk to you about.

Someone, get some private footage of the dad making these works to settle this case once and for all. All this talk is circumstantial and going in circles.

You think if he's committing felony fraud that he's going to do it in the back yard? Or even anywhere near an open window? At the prices these paintings are going for, if not done by the child as claimed, it's fraud. There'll NEVER be footage of these pieces being created because he knows it's fraud and is smart enough to be careful about it I'm sure...

Well, I'm an artist, and I know damn well that I have more morals than the rest of you put together.
So ner.

"Since he is an artist, i highly doubt he is going to put his own daughter through that"

Ooh, and we never take advantage of someone who is vulnerable for our own personal gain, either.

We're great, we are.

"Since he is an artist, i highly doubt he is going to put his own daughter through that"

Oh yeah? What about the football dad & cheerleader mom who put their kids through hell so that they make first string, or head cheerleader?? Being an 'artist' doesn't make you different from anyone else when it comes to your kid. I know plenty of artists...they're mostly normal, w/ a few spacey moments (they're artists after all...they have a different view of a lot of things), I'm sure that if they felt like their kid could make it into something they'd push their kid hard. Look at the pageant (sp?) moms. They put makeup & spray tan on their toddlers & infants. (I personally think they should be disqualified for that!! My kid looks cute w/o the makeup & fake hair.)

Anywho...what I'm trying to say is that he's a parent. There are pushy parents & there are parents who don't care if their kids grow up to be famous...they just want them to be able to cope. This guy seems like a pushy parent. If he wanted this girl to be a concert pianist, he'd be yelling instruction at her while she sat on the piano bench. Money motivates!

If they payed for the painting and liked them, then no harm done.

the parents, or at least the father, is a criminal, using his daughter to get rich. It had nothing to do with art or passion! Just bloody money. the greed of some people. Do they think we are stupid. I feel sorry for that little Marla when she is old enough to realise what her parents have done, AND SHOWN IT TO THE WORLD. Im in New Zealand.

So I watched the 60 minutes show on alleged child prodigy Marla and was shocked at what I saw. The only thing the poor child seems to have to do with these 'masterpieces' is to have her name assigned to them! Whilst it could be argued that she was unable to work at the best of her artistic abilities due to the camera in place- let's remind ourselves that it was hidden which means that in theory she shouldn't have been aware she was being watched. The difference in quality (if we can use that term) was astounding; the work we saw her create was nothing special and even this was under the coaching and direction from her I'm-a-failed-artist-in-my-own-right daddy.

There were too many questions surrounding this for it to remotely credible. What is most unbelievable is that Marla's paintings are still being sold since the airing of the programme. Her parents must be laughing all the way to the bank. How long for i wonder...

It's so obvious that this is her Dad painting and claiming it's her. He knows that these paintings wouldn't catch nearly what it would unless people would think they where done by a 4 year old.

Daddy needs to stop exploiting his little girl!!

This is just a pure CON. These people who bought her work thinking it was really her should ask for their money back.

Does it really surprise anyone that 'dad' is out there orchestrating everything when her paintings are making that much ?

Just a giant scam. 60 minutes didn't promote that piece right. I thought it was all legit.

Why do people purchase art? Is the value of these works intrinsically dependant on who the artist is? How do you assign a value to a work of art? All these responses assume that the buyers' motives are investments (at least partially) and that the price tags are (at least partially) due to the fact that they were painted by a child. Investments are risky ventures and should be thoroughly analyzed, no? Did the buyers sign a contract at the time of purchase which stated that the little girl had the sole hand involved in creating these painings? What was their proof? Maybe they should have bought the work simply because they liked the art. Maybe they did. Further, if this turns/ed out to be a scandal or "hoax", who's to say that the art won't increase in value more than if it was,original to the child? She might have turned out to be a lousy artist as she grew and these were just flukes... who's to say? This whole "hoax" could be a method piece created by the girl's father as a commentary on how we value art... I mean, really, the possibilities are endless... and even this scandal out to be a "hoax" the people whe purchased the art should have no recourse. It is their own fault if they feel they were "cheated." The whle situation exemplifies that the artwork was overpriced to begin with (like an inflated stock).

I found this site after hearing of the movie about this family at the Sundance festival...


Nobody will sue and it will be for the reasons scammers are rarely brought to justice: the victims have been made too big a fool of. What will happen is the father will be forced out and with a nice story to repair everybody's reputation (buyer's and family's) and also to help the art from depreciating.

Hugely controversial
This is a huge salvo in the arsenal of tradionalists. There's been "upside down syndrome" where dozens of artworks have been documented to have been displayed incorrectly and there's even been attempts at throwing away modern works by janitors. "Spot the one done by a (fill in the blank, usually a kid or animal)" experiments have been done as well. This situation is unique because it took academics in psychology, scientists if you may, to uncover what was really going on in the works: who and how they were created. For once, the inaccurate understanding couldn't be blamed on the "plebes" getting it wrong.

In short, many many people "need" for this girl to be the artist and will not believe their lying eyes.

My little girl is 3 and has wonderful art and can read, write, count add, subtract and much more, but to expose her to the public rather than educate her is wrong. Her art is very special to me, but she is amazing. She has a photogenic memory and has just finished a doll house project on her own. So does this make her a prodegy?

That to me is not art and should not be sold, my 3 year old paints and draws much better than that and not to mention, she started befor the age of 1 year. Sorry, to me that is not art, just a little girl who is moving her brush in circles as any child of that age can do

I would buy your cats art. HA HA, it would be something more realistic than a child not wanting to paint in public. Dont get me wrong, my 3 year old is very shy, but you put other kids and some paint and colors, you would never know she was shy. So malarky to the shy bit. Kids who love to paint will no matter where they are. They may not speak to adults other than there parents, but put them on Disney and have those kids interview her to find out the truth.

I just watched the movie about Marla and even though I have my suspicions, what did strike me is that she never once said anything like. "Oh I didn't paint that", or "my Daddy painted that, or "My daddy helped me paint this" At age four it would be very very hard to train her to always say the right thing and not give any hint that her father helped her.