Hooboy. Why am I not surprised?
Phil Steinberg - 06 April 2012 07:45 AM
Guys you are amazing !
If you read and investigated what I gave you you would have found some double placebo studies as you requested
No, that is very much NOT what you provided, and you know it.
If you had read thouroughly what I gave you you would have had enough to question your scepticism and had been nicer than arrogant and insulting, pleasing eachother in attacks against the products, the company, and personal attacks.
Do not try and play victim. YOU are the one who started in on the personal attacks. Don’t try and assault someone’s credibility without offering up why we should trust your own. And if YOU had read this thread thoroughly, you would have known full well what to expect.
Again, there has been only one of you who simply asked questions for answers, and I replied to him with enough element for anyone honnestly looking for proofs.
So when everyone ELSE asked their questions, and asked for proofs, that was just make-believe? What little ‘proof’ you provided was the same tired ‘findings’ that company shills have been providing us with all along. You cannot expect us to believe in your product if you won’t provide us what we want in the way of proof.
But you all hide behind your claims that you take for the only ones valid in your eyes.
Suit yourselves and have fun, every one has the right to have fun his own way.
More ad hominem, dismissing our questions, concerns, and requests for information as frivolity? Not cool.
You know it takes ages to get what you want, and that any alternative solution is fought against by the pharmaceutical industry.
You may know that in Canada you may go to jail for just growing aromatic herbs if they have been said to have health beneficial properties…. that in Europe a text have been voted to ban the sale of aromatic herbs as insignificant as Marjolain on public markets. They must go through the agreement of the pharmaceuticals…
Ah yes… the ‘Big Pharma Conspiracy’. You DO know that they LOVE finding new cures and things, right? It’s pretty much HOW they make money, not by covering things up. If what you’re saying were true, then we wouldn’t have, say, Viagra.
If you were honnestly looking for the truth, knowing that a government agency of a major european country (I will give you the name of the country once it’s all official) would stop your sarcasms.
Um, no, that’s not how truth works. You don’t get to make those claims without proof.
I offered you go get a few people with knee arthritis and to guide you position the patches right…
All I could read was more sarcasms and that bla bla whatever you wrote. The truth is probably that you don’t dare whitnessing such effective results.
No problem to me, since anyway, your only goal is the critic.
Nope. More ad hominem. Please don’t even try that route. We will CHEERFULLY support a product that turns out to be correct and useful. All we want is reassurances as to its effectiveness and safety.
Therefore this will be my last post, since I have no time to lose in your durty game.
Thought the previous one was your last post?
Peter, if you are honnestly open to the truth, then PM me, or email me, I’ll get you some icewave, once you have agreed on a how we will do the test.
Then you can tell those jerks what you will have seen.
Bye all
Enjoy your circus
I wonder why he thinks Peter is somehow more willing to believe him. He is asking for proof and documentation just as much, if not more, than the rest of us.
Still, we are not the ones doing name-calling. We just want you to be honest and provide us with proof to back up your claims. Not what the company says is proof, but real, honest proof.
