I think they are probably the same person posting from two different locations…(Like say, work and home…)

That would give him/them different IP’s.

(I can just see them frothing at the mouth while posting at work…....at the daycare...)  

ETA: HEAR! HEAR! ACCIPITER!! I CONCUR WHOLEHEARTEDLY!!

And I’m going to go ahead and repeat this on this page, just so that BLT doesn’t have that excuse to miss seeing it:

AN UNOFFICIAL ULTIMATUM TO YOU, BLT

Let’s forget for the moment about all the other random stuff you’ve gone on about on this page.  Let’s look at the supposed subject of this page, which you have pretty much ignored so far:  the death of Jorg Haider.

So far, you have done nothing on this Forum but regurgitate a bunch of unconnected, mostly nonsensical, and often false bits and pieces of other peoples’ words and then directed us off onto long chains of links that didn’t say anything coherent and that sometimes tried to infect our computers.  Let’s see you clearly make a complete statement about Jorg Haider.  Here, I’ll even make it easy for you by giving you a basic outline based on what I can decypher of your claims.

1.  I know that Jorg Haider was an Illuminati agent because:

2.  I know that Jorg Haider was murdered, and that the reports of his death being the result of an accident are false, because:

3.  I know it was the Illuminati who killed him because:

4.  The reason(s) for the Illuminati killing him is(are):

5.  The ultimate goal of the Illuminati, stated in clear and non-symbolic terms, is:

If you truly are trying to inform us of some dire threat, then you will try to answer the above.  If you don’t, then I’ll have to conclude that you’re here for some nefarious ulterior motives and will have to start mocking you.

Accipiter - 11 October 2008 03:19 PM

AN UNOFFICIAL ULTIMATUM TO YOU, BLT

1.  I know that Jorg Haider was an Illuminati agent because:

 

I stated the opposite, i.e. Jorg Haider was NOT an Illuminati agent. So explain first of all the reasoning that lead you to this false conclusion.

BigLieTechnique - 11 October 2008 05:09 PM

Accipiter - 11 October 2008 03:19 PM

AN UNOFFICIAL ULTIMATUM TO YOU, BLT

1.  I know that Jorg Haider was an Illuminati agent because:

 

I stated the opposite, i.e. Jorg Haider was NOT an Illuminati agent. So explain first of all the reasoning that lead you to this false conclusion.

Ah, yes, so you did.  That’s part of the problem with the disjointed way those “bulletins” you post are written; it’s difficult to keep track of what you’re saying.  So, let’s change number one to:

1.  I know that Jorg Haider was not an Illuminati agent because:

Googling “illuminati agents” “basic test” ...
returns as first result
http://engforum.pravda.ru/archive/index.php/t-167549.html

The first line states:
“An illuminati agent is exposed once he is forced to deny that 1 + 1 = 2. That is the basic test.”

The article gives a link with an example: what this denial means for people debating 9/11. In other words: how to detect CIA psy-ops arguing in internet forums about 9/11.

The article also gives an example that can be used for Haider: if somebody sells to the masses the introduction of voting machines, then that means denying that 1 + 1 = 2.

Haider was murdered because:
-  as illuminati overtime enters the last stage, introduction of voting machines is also required in Austria;
- he was an obstacle to the implementation of that step.

So two of your questions are now answered
1.  I know that Jorg Haider was NOT an Illuminati agent because:

4.  The main reason for the Illuminati killing him is:

BigLieTechnique - 11 October 2008 06:35 PM

Googling “illuminati agents” “basic test” ...
returns as first result
http://engforum.pravda.ru/archive/index.php/t-167549.html

The first line states:
“An illuminati agent is exposed once he is forced to deny that 1 + 1 = 2. That is the basic test.”

The article gives a link with an example: what this denial means for people debating 9/11. In other words: how to detect CIA psy-ops arguing in internet forums about 9/11.

The article also gives an example that can be used for Haider: if somebody sells to the masses the introduction of voting machines, then that means denying that 1 + 1 = 2.

Haider was murdered because:
-  as illuminati overtime enters the last stage, introduction of voting machines is also required in Austria;
- he was an obstacle to the implementation of that step.

So two of your questions are now answered
1.  I know that Jorg Haider was NOT an Illuminati agent because:

4.  The main reason for the Illuminati killing him is:

1.  I know that Jorg Haider was not an Illuminati agent because:  “He said 1 + 1 = 2.”  That is an absolutely rubbish answer.  It is meaningless, without any context, without any support, without anything.  FAIL

2.  I know that Jorg Haider was murdered, and that the reports of his death being the result of an accident are false, because:  No answer given.  FAIL

3.  I know it was the Illuminati who killed him because:  No answer given.  FAIL

4.  The reason(s) for the Illuminati killing him is(are):  “He was blocking the use of voting machines in Austria.”  Okay, finally we’re getting somewhere.  Sort of.  Looking around online, I can’t find any mention of Austrian voting procedure that states whether they do or don’t use voting machines.  I did find a fair number of sites about voting online (which is something related to but different from voting machines); it seems that while setting up such a system is not a top priority for the Austrian government, they’re looking into the idea and have been for several years.  What I cannot find the slightest mention of is anything mentioning Jorg Haider’s stance on voting machines.  So your answer here is only a partial answer:  how is it that you know Jorg Haider was blocking the use of voting machines in Austria? 

5.  The ultimate goal of the Illuminati, stated in clear and non-symbolic terms, is:  No answer given.  FAIL

Accipiter - 11 October 2008 02:55 PM

As for number 23 (Fortuyn had executive power in politics), I haven’t seen any sign of that being true.  But then, I’m not really up to date on the workings of political factions in Dutch government.

He hadn’t. He was a parliamentary candidate for the elections, but not a parliament member, let alone a cabinet member. Only the latter have executive power. The only thing BLT was right in, is that he was assasinated. By a left-wing eco-activist.

LaMa - 11 October 2008 09:43 PM

Accipiter - 11 October 2008 02:55 PM

As for number 23 (Fortuyn had executive power in politics), I haven’t seen any sign of that being true.  But then, I’m not really up to date on the workings of political factions in Dutch government.

He hadn’t. He was a parliamentary candidate for the elections, but not a parliament member, let alone a cabinet member. Only the latter have executive power. The only thing BLT was right in, is that he was assasinated. By a left-wing eco-activist.

That’s what I thought, but for some odd reason Dutch politics is not one of my strong points.  But I had a feeling that you would know. 

Robin Bobcat - 11 October 2008 11:44 AM

*facepalm*

Ok, why the heck is this goob allowed anywhere near an internet connection again?

Thats because some idiot government dumped him in an island in the middle of the pacific to placed in a huge asylum. Built just for him with a group of 12 doctors and 24 nurses and 12 priests each taking a 1 mnth shift each of the people in the asylum except for BLT are given internet connection all the staff members except the priests are armed with fully loaded m-16s or shotguns theyre given orders to shoot to kill. sometimes when the guards are asleep he breaks out to read about more and more conspiracy theories then posts here to annoy the hell out of everone that as breif as i can explain

ive also found him in a website…
http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Image:Pieeater.jpg
*since what happened to gray this is both NSFW ans SFW unless youre a guy this is totally creepy…
 

You just had to go and ruin my breakfast didn’t you???

gray - 12 October 2008 06:53 AM

You just had to go and ruin my breakfast didn’t you???

Did i do that sorry but if it wasnt me ill send you more half naked fat assed guys which i found on uncyclopedia by accident