Murder of Austrian political leader Jorg Haider for dummies

Murders or murder attempts used to advance the illuminati agenda can be basically classified in two basic types, according to the “murder the own agents or not“ line:

- yes: the Annas type (Lindh, Politkovskaya);
- no.

This second type, can be basically divided into two subtypes. according to the “directly linked to the control of the political system or not“ line:
- no: the Diana type;
- yes.

This “YES” subtype, can be basically divided into two subtypes, according to the “target has some sort of executive powers within the political or judicial system or not“ line:
- no. (1)
- yes.

Note
(1) The murder of JFK Jr, directly related to the acceptance of the mark of the beast, is the ultimate example of the “NO” case. Why?
Answer:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Pim+Fortuyn+MattMarriott
Result #1 as of today (from a forum managed by the CIA Web of Disinfo):
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread93255/pg1
Because Google knows the Laws of End Time Reductionism:

Don’t be mislead by the fact that Pim Fortuyn is used to find the page explaining how the murder of JFK Jr is directly related to the acceptance of the mark of the beast. The murder of Pim Fortuyn belongs to the other type, i.e. the “YES” type.

Reminder:
- last murder attempt of type “YES” in the US / EU: Ronald Reagan; Oskar Lafontaine.
- last murder of type “YES” in the US / EU: Robert Kennedy; Jörg Haider, the only after Pim Fortuyn. The VERY last, not only because it was just hours ago.
Reaching the 30 pct line, theoretically possible if voting machines were not installed on time, means the death sentence.
Now why are these cases so rare and and after Haider there will be no more any such case in Illuminatziland?

The first part of the answer was already given above (see mark of the beast). The second result, as of today, has the rest of the answer:
http://who-are-the-illuminati.blogspot.com/2004/05/only-two-who-were-not-illuminati-agents.html

Note that the very same page is also result #1 for:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=non-illuminati
Once again Google proves to know what the Laws of End Time Reductionism are all about.

Strobe lights in the weekend nights

By the way, guess who wrote the first page worldwide (1999) and so far only one connecting all these dots, i.e. Diana, J F K Jr and strobe lights in the weekend nights (i.e. also the Haider dot):
http://www.princess-diana-murder.blogspot.com/

———-
1 + 1 + 30 = Haider’s death sentence

Only executive power speaking out against the “independence” of Kosovo…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cAKetHCHrQ
Only executive power speaking AND handling. Exampling: against skylines where mosques replace cathedrals
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTp0pxmrsBk

How silly of me to think that a thread titled “Murder of Jorg Haider. . .“ would actually be about Jorg Haider.

Once again BLT proves to not know what coherence is all about.

Update: Strobe light, the method used with Princess Diana, was upscaled here, with significantly heavier weaponry.
Long after the acceptance of the mark it is pointeless to carefully execute these type of murdersl.
It is actually exactly the opposite. The sheep should immediately be told (see circular hole in roof) what happened, not like with Diana, keep revealing details but only completing the process (releasing the photo shot exactly the same second as the strobe flashed) ten years later.

PHOTO

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_XWUVhkAovrM/SPD-GitHm8I/AAAAAAAAABc/TVhqy9gCzg0/s1600-h/das+Loch+im+Dach.jpg

*facepalm*

Ok, why the heck is this goob allowed anywhere near an internet connection again?

Yeah. I think someone’s off his meds again…

I think he’s going for some sort of record number of unconnected vague meaningless phrases in one Forum thread.  After all, he’s so far written three posts on one topic without actually saying anything at all.  That can’t be purely an accident, can it?

“BigLieTechnique” can’t be a real person; he sounds more lie a rather primitive chatterbot.

Okay, BLT, here are things that you’ve claimed or suggested on this page:

1.  Jorg Haider was murdered
2.  Jorg Haider was an Illuminati agent
3.  Jorg Haider was killed by the Illuminati
4.  Lindh (Anna Lindh, the Swede?) was murdered
5.  Lindh was an Illuminati agent
6.  Lindh was killed by the Illuminati
7.  Politkovskaya was murdered
8.  Politkovskaya was an Illuminati agent
9.  Politkovskaya was killed by the Illuminati
10.  Diana (the former Princess of Wales?) was murdered
11.  Diana was not an Illuminati agent
12.  Diana was killed by the Illuminati
13.  Diana was not directly linked to control of the political system
14.  John F. Kennedy, Junior was murdered
15.  John F. Kennedy, Junior was not an Illuminati agent
16.  John F. Kennedy, Junior was killed by the Illuminati
17.  John F. Kennedy, Junior was directly linked to control of the political system
18.  John F. Kennedy, Junior had no executive power within the political system
19.  Fortuyn was murdered
20.  Fortuyn was not an Illuminati agent
21.  Fortuyn was killed by the Illuminati
22.  Fortuyn was directly linked to control of the political system
23.  Fortuyn had executive power within the political system
24.  Reagan was almost murdered
25.  Reagan was not an Illuminati agent
26.  Reagan was killed by the Illuminati
27.  Reagan was directly linked to control of the political system
28.  Reagan had executive power within the political system
29.  Reagan was the last attempted murder of a non-agent with executive power by the Illuminati in the US
30.  Lafontaine was almost murdered
31.  Lafontaine was not an Illuminati agent
32.  Lafontaine was killed by the Illuminati
33.  Lafontaine was directly linked to control of the political system
34.  Lafontaine had executive power within the political system
35.  Lafontaine was the last attempted murder of a non-agent with executive power by the Illuminati in the EU
36.  Robert Kennedy was murdered
37.  Robert Kennedy was not an Illuminati agent
38.  Robert Kennedy was killed by the Illuminati
39.  Robert Kennedy was directly linked to control of the political system
40.  Robert Kennedy had executive power within the political system
41.  Robert Kennedy was the last murder of a non-agent with executive power by the Illuminati in the US
42.  Jorg Haider was murdered
43.  Jorg Haider was not an Illuminati agent
44.  Jorg Haider was killed by the Illuminati
45.  Jorg Haider was directly linked to control of the political system
46.  Jorg Haider had executive power within the political system
47.  Jorg Haider was the last murder of a non-agent with executive power by the Illuminati in the EU
48.  Fortuyn was the second to last murder of a non-agent with executive power by the Illuminati in the EU
49.  There will be no more murders of non-agents with executive power by the Illuminati in the EU
50.  Reaching the 30% line (whatever that is supposed to mean) will lead to being killed
51.  Reaching 30% is only possible if there is a delay in installing voting machines
52.  John F. Kennedy, Junior’s death was directly related to accepting the mark of the beast
53.  32 is the cause of Haider’s death
54.  Strobe lights were used to kill Diana
55.  Upscaled heavy-duty strobelights were used on Haider
56.  People should immediately be told of some unspecified thing ten years later
57.  A circular hole in some roof immediately tells people some unspecified thing

For not one of those things did you provide even the slightest shred of evidence to back yourself up with.  For not a single one of those did you show any connection between them.  For not a single one of those did you show any sign of a conspiracy.

Granted that some of them (such as number 14) are pretty much well known, and can be easily confirmed.  But for many other of your claims (such as number 1), they go against the available information.  We need to trust public media to know that some of those things are true, while at the same time assume that public media is lying to us if we are to accept most of what you claim.

Then there are your claims that simply are nonsensical, such as numbers 50, 51, 54, and 58.  And claims that contradict themselves, such as 57.  Would you care to actually try explaining any of those?

As for number 23 (Fortuyn had executive power in politics), I haven’t seen any sign of that being true.  But then, I’m not really up to date on the workings of political factions in Dutch government.

As it currently stands, everything you’ve written on this page is unconnected, unsupported, and a good part of it seemingly wrong or gibberish.  Are you going to actually try to tell us anything and inform us, or are you going to continue spouting random gibberish and make your claims to be informing us about the Illuminati into a lie?

Can’t a mod ban these trolls?

I mean, CMON! 

They consistantly break Rule #8:

Please cite your sources. If posting about a news story in the “In the news” section, provide a link to the story, if possible. Saying “I’ll find a link later” is not helpful. Also, provide a brief summary of what the story is about. Simply posting a link is not informative (especially if the link later goes dead).

and

Rule #12:

To avoid appearing self-absorbed, try to respond to topics started by others more often than starting topics of your own.

and last but not least
Rule #17:

Multiple accounts are not allowed. (If you think you have a legitimate reason to have more than one account, please contact a moderator to discuss it.)

I realize that they are in a painful way, entertaining, but after some five or more threads, when do you call “enough” and banish them to the ether?

Just my thoughts on the matter.

AN UNOFFICIAL ULTIMATUM TO YOU, BLT

Let’s forget for the moment about all the other random stuff you’ve gone on about on this page.  Let’s look at the supposed subject of this page, which you have pretty much ignored so far:  the death of Jorg Haider.

So far, you have done nothing on this Forum but regurgitate a bunch of unconnected, mostly nonsensical, and often false bits and pieces of other peoples’ words and then directed us off onto long chains of links that didn’t say anything coherent and that sometimes tried to infect our computers.  Let’s see you clearly make a complete statement about Jorg Haider.  Here, I’ll even make it easy for you by giving you a basic outline based on what I can decypher of your claims.

1.  I know that Jorg Haider was an Illuminati agent because:

2.  I know that Jorg Haider was murdered, and that the reports of his death being the result of an accident are false, because:

3.  I know it was the Illuminati who killed him because:

4.  The reason(s) for the Illuminati killing him is(are):

5.  The ultimate goal of the Illuminati, stated in clear and non-symbolic terms, is:

If you truly are trying to inform us of some dire threat, then you will try to answer the above.  If you don’t, then I’ll have to conclude that you’re here for some nefarious ulterior motives and will have to start mocking you.

DavePrime - 11 October 2008 03:06 PM

Rule #17:

Multiple accounts are not allowed. (If you think you have a legitimate reason to have more than one account, please contact a moderator to discuss it.)

It’s so hard to tell, though, if they really are the same person with different names, or instead are two individuals.  All that they do is copy and paste, so there’s no personality in anything they’re saying.  I think that if they were coming from the same ISP number, though, then the Mods would have noticed.