Rise of the rat-brained robots-Also known as the END OF TIME
Posted: 14 August 2008 06:33 AM   [ Ignore ]
Five Star Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  22647
Joined  2006-03-29

Link

AFTER buttoning up a lab coat, snapping on surgical gloves and spraying them with alcohol, I am deemed sanitary enough to view a robot’s control system up close. Without such precautions, any fungal spores on my skin could infect it. “We’ve had that happen. They just stop working and die off,” says Mark Hammond, the system’s creator.

This is no ordinary robot control system - a plain old microchip connected to a circuit board. Instead, the controller nestles inside a small pot containing a pink broth of nutrients and antibiotics. Inside that pot, some 300,000 rat neurons have made - and continue to make - connections with each other.

As they do so, the disembodied neurons are communicating, sending electrical signals to one another just as they do in a living creature. We know this because the network of neurons is connected at the base of the pot to 80 electrodes, and the voltages sparked by the neurons are displayed on a computer screen.

It’s these spontaneous electrical patterns that researchers at the University of Reading in the UK want to harness to control a robot. If they can do so reliably, by stimulating the neurons with signals from sensors on the robot and using the neurons’ response to get the robots to respond, they hope to gain insights into how brains function. Such insights might help in the treatment of conditions like Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy.

“We’re trying to understand what is going on inside this brain material that could have direct implications for human health,” says Kevin Warwick, Reading’s head of cybernetics, who is running the project with Hammond and Ben Whalley, both neuroscientists.

The team are far from alone in this aim. At a July conference on in-vitro recording technology in Reutlingen, Germany, teams from around the world presented projects on culturing brain material and plugging it into simulations and robots, or “animats” as they are known.

To create the “brain”, the neural cortex from a rat fetus is surgically removed and disassociating enzymes applied to it to disconnect the neurons from each other. The researchers then deposit a slim layer of these isolated neurons into a nutrient-rich medium on a bank of electrodes, where they start reconnecting. They do this by growing projections that reach out to touch the neighbouring neurons. “It’s just fascinating that they do this,” says Steve Potter of the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, who pioneered the field of neurally controlled animats. “Clearly brain cells have evolved to reconnect under almost any circumstance that doesn’t kill them.”

After about five days, patterns of electrical activity can be detected as the neurons transmit signals around what has become a very dense mesh of axons and dendrites. The neurons seem to be randomly firing, producing pulses of voltage known as action potentials. Often, though, many or all of them will fire in unison, a phenomenon known as “bursting”.

There are various views on what these bursts are. Some see them as pathological activity - akin to what happens in epilepsy - while others see them as the neural network expressing a stored memory. “I interpret them as seizure-like behaviour,” says Potter. “I think the bursting is a function of sensory deprivation.”

Like a creature with no limbs or senses, the cut-down brain is simply bursting out of boredom, says Whalley. “With no structured sensory input the hypothesis is that you get arbitrarily random and quite often detrimental activity because all these cells are asking for some kind of direction.”
...

Video Link in action.

 Signature 

“That which ought to have been done is to be regarded as done in favor of one to whom and against one from whom performance is due.”
—Snoopy

Profile
 
 
Posted: 14 August 2008 09:24 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Five Star Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6821
Joined  2005-04-17

OMG the poor rat!  It’s brain is still trying to work, to orient itself!  I am not sure I appreciate this experiment.

 Signature 

GROK

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 August 2008 02:26 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Five Star Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4844
Joined  2005-10-21

Well, it’s not an entire rat brain, but rather a fetal rat brain, turned into mush, and a small bit of it smeared over a bit of nutrients. It’s not the cohesive whole it once was, nor is it complex, and so there’s nothing there to ‘feel’ anything.

It’s like expecting a pocket calculator to play World of Warcraft. The mechanics are there, but in a much, much simpler form, and in an insufficient amount to make it less than ludicrous.

 Signature 

1: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. If it does what it says, you should have no problem with this.
2: What proof will you accept that you are wrong? You ask us to change our mind, but we cannot change yours?
3: It is not our responsability to disprove your claims, but rather your responsability to prove them.

What part of ‘meow’ don’t you understand?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2008 07:29 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Five Star Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1624
Joined  2006-05-20

“Bury me. . . .bury me. . . bury me. . . .”


It also sounds like they don’t get anything yet beyond a bit of random neuron activity. And to say the neuron “bursts” are the result of “boredom” is to commit the pathetic fallacy.

 Signature 

The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head.

  —Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

“That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way.”

—Ponder Stibbons

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2008 06:22 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Five Star Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4844
Joined  2005-10-21

Mm.. Not conventional boredrom, but if they fire off when they’ve been in a relaxed state for an extended period of time, with no other stimulus….

Of course, it’s probably just a safety mechanism designed to keep them working optimally, with the right amount of neurotransmitters, etc. You don’t want the mental equivalent of couch potatos, after all..

 Signature 

1: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. If it does what it says, you should have no problem with this.
2: What proof will you accept that you are wrong? You ask us to change our mind, but we cannot change yours?
3: It is not our responsability to disprove your claims, but rather your responsability to prove them.

What part of ‘meow’ don’t you understand?

Profile