Welcome Guest   ·   Login   ·   Register
Hoax Museum  >  Forum Home  >  Hoax Forum  >  Conspiracy Theories  >  Thread
Search  
  
  Advanced Search
   
2 of 3
Prev
1
2
3
Next
The real story behind the Beatles and “Paul is dead”
 
cindik
Posted: 07 June 2008 09:35 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  102
Joined  2008-05-20
Tobester - 07 June 2008 01:16 PM

Andy Kaufman!
John Titor!

I don’t have any theories about them (although it would be perfectly Kaufmanesque for him to wait until everyone forgot him and then come back and say “just kidding!”)


My brother has one about Don Knotts.
Profile
 
 
Rik the Viking
Posted: 09 June 2008 03:09 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 13 ]
Jr. Member
Avatar
RankRank
Total Posts:  46
Joined  2007-06-14

Wait a minute… the real John Lennon (who should look like Paul right?) would never marry Heather Mills! Something’s amiss :p

cindik - 06 June 2008 08:09 PM

Wait until I tell you who Jim Morrison is now.
MUWAHAHAHAHAH

JFK? Hitler? cheese
Profile
 
 
Tobester
Posted: 10 June 2008 09:16 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 14 ]
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  734
Joined  2006-12-06
cindik - 06 June 2008 02:30 PM

Upon hearing the quote “Do not judge a man until you have walked a thousand miles in his shoes”, they agreed to have plastic surgery to look like each other.

Why didn’t they just swap shoes?

 Signature 

“I have CDO. Its like OCD, but in alphabetical order, LIKE IT SHOULD BE!!”
Profile
 
 
cindik
Posted: 10 June 2008 09:21 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 15 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  102
Joined  2008-05-20
Tobester - 10 June 2008 01:16 PM
cindik - 06 June 2008 02:30 PM

Upon hearing the quote “Do not judge a man until you have walked a thousand miles in his shoes”, they agreed to have plastic surgery to look like each other.

Why didn’t they just swap shoes?

They didn’t fit, and remember the saying “If the shoe fits, wear it”. The inverse is “if the shoe doesn’t fit, don’t wear it”.

The converse is “if you’re wearing the shoe, it fits”, but the Beatles weren’t wearing Converse.
Profile
 
 
ComicSpeaker
Posted: 30 August 2008 09:51 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 16 ]
New Member
Rank
Total Posts:  1
Joined  2005-03-30
cindik - 06 June 2008 02:30 PM

The usual information about “Paul is dead”:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_is_dead

Later, Campbell was going to spill the beans in a tell-all book. One of the Beatles’ biggest fans was recruited to stop him. On December 8, 1980, Mark David Chapman killed Paul McCartney’s replacement, William Shears Campbell, known to most people as “John Lennon”.

Who hired Chapman? Ringo?
Profile
 
 
JoeDaJuggler
Posted: 31 August 2008 02:15 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 17 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1624
Joined  2006-05-20

I couldn’t get past the premise where spending money somehow makes you not have to pay income taxes on it.

 Signature 

The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head.

  —Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

[color=green]“That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way.”
Profile
 
 
Mark-N-Isa
Posted: 28 September 2008 10:54 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 18 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1194
Joined  2005-02-22

Who really cares anyway? The Beatles sucked… no matter who they were!

blank stare

 Signature 

Canadian Bacon Rules !!!
Profile
 
 
Robin Bobcat
Posted: 29 September 2008 06:01 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 19 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6834
Joined  2005-10-21

Sir, you have offended me greatly. For this, I insist that I shall meet you upon the field of honor. Bring your appointed second and a bucket of gummi bears.

 Signature 

1: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. If it does what it says, you should have no problem with this.
2: What proof will you accept that you are wrong? You ask us to change our mind, but we cannot change yours?
3: It is not our responsability to disprove your claims, but rather your responsability to prove them.
4. Personal testamonials are not proof.

What part of ‘meow’ don’t you understand?
Profile
 
 
Smerk
Posted: 29 September 2008 06:05 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 20 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  26313
Joined  2004-11-29

No, Mark.  I’m not going to be your second.

Psst.  Robin…don’t know if it makes any difference, but Mark loves Avril Lavigne…

 Signature 

Remember, a Dragon is for life!
Profile
 
 
Tobester
Posted: 29 September 2008 09:37 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 21 ]
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  734
Joined  2006-12-06

Avril Lavigne=

Larvae Living
Vaginal Liver (the undisputed winner)
Vaginal Viler
Vanilla Giver
Larva Veiling
Lava Reviling
Lava Reliving
Ravelling Via
Villager Vain
Raveling Vial
Leaving Viral
Leaving Rival
Vinegar Villa
Grave Villain
Revival Align
Vela Rivaling
Vela Virginal
Vale Rivaling
Vale Virginal
Lave Rivaling
Lave Virginal
Veal Rivaling
Veal Virginal
Valve Railin

 Signature 

“I have CDO. Its like OCD, but in alphabetical order, LIKE IT SHOULD BE!!”
Profile
 
 
Robin Bobcat
Posted: 29 September 2008 09:44 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 22 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6834
Joined  2005-10-21

‘Veal Virginal’....

Yeeeeaah…

 Signature 

1: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. If it does what it says, you should have no problem with this.
2: What proof will you accept that you are wrong? You ask us to change our mind, but we cannot change yours?
3: It is not our responsability to disprove your claims, but rather your responsability to prove them.
4. Personal testamonials are not proof.

What part of ‘meow’ don’t you understand?
Profile
 
 
   
2 of 3
Prev
1
2
3
Next
 
‹‹ Indiana jones might have been on to sonmething.      In Barcelona (Spain) ››