Peter - 12 August 2007 10:44 AM

How can you say they didn’t have some form of viewfinder. I used to own a camera that is similar to a hasselblad and I can see what looks like form of viewfinder on top of the picture of the Hasselblad on that web site you posted.

Actually, they apparently didn’t use a viewfinder, perhaps because it would be hard to use with helmets.  What they did instead was have the camera fixed onto the front of their suits so that it would point straight ahead.  Then all the astronauts had to do was face whatever they were taking a picture of.  Which accounts for why so many of their pictures were actually really bad and off-centre.

Peter - 12 August 2007 10:38 AM

Well I just had a look at that web site and I can tell you that Hasselblad camera looks like it has a motor drive on it.

Really? What kind of battery did they use?

Peter - 12 August 2007 10:38 AM

If the MOH web site is run by NASA or some other agency then why haven’t I been paid yet? I’m starting a Degree next year and I’d like some extra money for that plus the new Intel Mac I’m planning on buying. Please email these US agencies for me and find out why I haven’t been paid yet.

You can contact them and say to them that you are one of their puppets who is willing to believe anything they tell you. They will give you money.

Randy - 12 August 2007 10:48 AM

You can contact them and say to them that you are one of their puppet who is willing to believe anything they tell you.

You’re overlooking the little minor detail that many, if not most, of the answers we’ve given you here aren’t pulled from the pages of the “NASA Moon Landing Book”, but rather are basic science, basic photography, and just plain ordinary everyday experience.  Or has NASA been controlling all of science, photography and life for the past few centuries?

Randy - 12 August 2007 10:48 AM

Peter - 12 August 2007 10:38 AM

Well I just had a look at that web site and I can tell you that Hasselblad camera looks like it has a motor drive on it.

Really? What kind of battery did they use?

Peter - 12 August 2007 10:38 AM

If the MOH web site is run by NASA or some other agency then why haven’t I been paid yet? I’m starting a Degree next year and I’d like some extra money for that plus the new Intel Mac I’m planning on buying. Please email these US agencies for me and find out why I haven’t been paid yet.

You can contact them and say to them that you are one of their puppet who is willing to believe anything they tell you. They will give you money.

If you’re going to ask what kind of battery they used then I can see you don’t want to admit you might be wrong. It shows you don’t want to acknowledge what it being said. I used to work as a photographer and I believe I can recognise a motor drive (or manual assisted device like I used to have) when I see one.

If you’re going to say that the MOH web site is run by some US Government Agency then why haven’t you given us proof. I won’t ask for money because I don’t see proof of this. Plus I don’t expect to be paid for saying the truth. Nobody told me to say these things.

I see you haven’t said anything about Dr Karl’s article. Maybe you’re scared of being wrong.

EDIT. I’m turning off my computer now to get my shopping done. I feel I’m getting too annoyed with this so I need a break. Randy can say whatever he or she wants but I think Randy should also Google the term “Digging your own grave”.

Randy - 12 August 2007 10:48 AM

Peter - 12 August 2007 10:38 AM

Well I just had a look at that web site and I can tell you that Hasselblad camera looks like it has a motor drive on it.

Really? What kind of battery did they use?

Peter - 12 August 2007 10:38 AM

If the MOH web site is run by NASA or some other agency then why haven’t I been paid yet? I’m starting a Degree next year and I’d like some extra money for that plus the new Intel Mac I’m planning on buying. Please email these US agencies for me and find out why I haven’t been paid yet.

You can contact them and say to them that you are one of their puppets who is willing to believe anything they tell you. They will give you money.

Why should they pay us money just to ‘perpetuate the lie’ when 99% of the world accepts the facts?

Seems like a waste of money to me.

Randy - 12 August 2007 10:24 AM

I am suspicious of this forum site.
How come I am the only one that says the moon landing is a hoax in this forum.

Because you’re f***ing mental.

Randy, we’ve answered every one of your questions and also brought up a number of points regarding your ideas.  Are you ever going to answer any of our questions, or defend the points that we’ve addressed?  If you never do either, then it doesn’t exactly do your side of the argument any favours.

Now, now, Renquist.  Let’s try to be polite, even if he isn’t.

Accipiter - 12 August 2007 11:13 AM

Now, now, Renquist.  Let’s try to be polite.

Renquist didn’t say anything. This is NASA. We bought the account for One million Ugandan dollars. And now run it through our supercomputer. On the moon.

With two nosed dogs (I know they’re actually real and not a hoax but I still love the bloody wee things).

Oh.  Okay.  Carry on, then, NASA.

We’ll send you a postcard from the moon.

Except we haven’t been there. Becuase there’s no water for footprints and our space ships are too small to carry us in.