Welcome Guest   ·   Login   ·   Register
Hoax Museum  >  Forum Home  >  Hoax Forum  >  Conspiracy Theories  >  Thread
Search  
  
  Advanced Search
   
13 of 14
First
Prev
11
12
13
14
Next
was the moon landing a fake?
 
Captain Al
Posted: 22 July 2009 09:42 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 133 ]
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  354
Joined  2004-11-10

We’re in trouble now. The Moon Hoax was mentioned on The View.

 Signature 

Alas, to wear the mantle of Galileo it is not enough that you be persecuted by an unkind establishment, you must also be right.
-Robert Park
Profile
 
 
Unfairly Balanced
Posted: 22 July 2009 10:05 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 134 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5132
Joined  2005-01-27
Captain Al - 22 July 2009 01:42 PM

We’re in trouble now. The Moon Hoax was mentioned on The View.

OMG!

Whoopsi lost it.

 Signature 


“By the sweat on our brows, and the strengths of our backs…Gentlemen. Hoist the Colours! And you, madam, I warn you, I know the entire Geneva Convention by heart!”
Trust me.
Profile
 
 
Robin Bobcat
Posted: 06 April 2011 03:37 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 135 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6845
Joined  2005-10-21

Interesting.. We have either someone with deeply-held convictions… or a random troll. Either way, let’s see if your position holds up to discussion.

I am curious as to what ‘evidence’ you wish to put forward that it was faked? That *any* of the *multiple* moon landings were faked? What about the difficulty in concealing such shenanegains? And why do you feel that it would have been impossible for the US to have reached the moon?

After answering that aspect, I have to ask you: What evidence would you accept as being proof that the landings were real and legitimate?

 Signature 

1: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. If it does what it says, you should have no problem with this.
2: What proof will you accept that you are wrong? You ask us to change our mind, but we cannot change yours?
3: It is not our responsability to disprove your claims, but rather your responsability to prove them.
4. Personal testamonials are not proof.

What part of ‘meow’ don’t you understand?
Profile
 
 
Mr R
Posted: 06 April 2011 09:31 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 136 ]
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  493
Joined  2009-08-10

Talking to yourself again Robin?

I presume the post was removed?
Profile
 
 
Robin Bobcat
Posted: 06 April 2011 09:38 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 137 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6845
Joined  2005-10-21

Looks like it. Probably switched on the spam after I posted a response. *grumble* Makes sense, I suppose. Inflammatory topic, but on that hasn’t been accessed in a while..

 Signature 

1: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. If it does what it says, you should have no problem with this.
2: What proof will you accept that you are wrong? You ask us to change our mind, but we cannot change yours?
3: It is not our responsability to disprove your claims, but rather your responsability to prove them.
4. Personal testamonials are not proof.

What part of ‘meow’ don’t you understand?
Profile
 
 
daveprime
Posted: 06 April 2011 10:38 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 138 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10730
Joined  2008-02-21

I hadn’t noticed the post and probably deleted the person during the mass purge(s) this morning. red face  Sorry if it a was a real person. (If so they just need to sign back up with a semi-coherent member name.)

 Signature 

“Always, I Do What Is Necessary” - Rissa Kerguelen
Go to my Blog. It’s lonely.
I Am Still The Black Swan Of Trespass On Alien Waters
To the believer no proof is required; to the skeptic no proof is sufficient.

Profile
 
 
feotu
Posted: 06 April 2011 11:24 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 139 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  140
Joined  2010-09-21
Mr R - 06 April 2011 01:31 PM

Talking to yourself again Robin?

I presume the post was removed?


Hmmmmm.

Or maybe we need a new thread.

“Was Robin responding to a post in the “was the moon landing a fake?” thread, or is the post Robin refers to a hoax?”

 Signature 

“Facts are meaningless - you could use facts to prove anything that’s even remotely true!

“Weaseling out of things is what separates us from the animals. Except the weasel.” ... H Simpson

“The voices in my head may not be real, but they have some good ideas.”
Profile
 
 
Robin Bobcat
Posted: 06 April 2011 01:46 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 140 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6845
Joined  2005-10-21

I was responding to a post that has since gone *poof*.

And Dave, you should be more careful and double-check the folks that’ve actually posted, rather than just signed on.

 Signature 

1: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. If it does what it says, you should have no problem with this.
2: What proof will you accept that you are wrong? You ask us to change our mind, but we cannot change yours?
3: It is not our responsability to disprove your claims, but rather your responsability to prove them.
4. Personal testamonials are not proof.

What part of ‘meow’ don’t you understand?
Profile
 
 
daveprime
Posted: 06 April 2011 02:30 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 141 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10730
Joined  2008-02-21

raspberry

When there are FOUR or FIVE pages of spammers (50 per page), mistakes happen.  (Though i DO try and at least take a look at every ‘member’ name to see if they have posted.  I probably missed that one because it was covered by your post and I hadn’t yet gone and caught up on the threads.) red face wink

 Signature 

“Always, I Do What Is Necessary” - Rissa Kerguelen
Go to my Blog. It’s lonely.
I Am Still The Black Swan Of Trespass On Alien Waters
To the believer no proof is required; to the skeptic no proof is sufficient.

Profile
 
 
drwhorules
Posted: 25 April 2011 11:10 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 142 ]
New Member
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  23
Joined  2011-04-21

of course it is a fake the flag shouldn’t of swayed

 Signature 

Im right your wrong
Profile
 
 
Peter
Posted: 25 April 2011 11:30 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 143 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2792
Joined  2005-06-15
drwhorules - 25 April 2011 03:10 PM

of course it is a fake the flag shouldn’t of swayed

hmmm

It swayed because they had just made sure the pole was firmly in the ground. The vibrations from that caused the swaying.

So it was not fake.

 Signature 

I’m not some ordinary moron.
I’m an Oxy-Moron!

Mental Giant: A very tall person who is more than slightly confused.
Profile
 
 
   
13 of 14
First
Prev
11
12
13
14
Next
 
     Are there aliens among us? ››