There is substantive proof of a long history of weather modification, and climatic control, as well as chemtrail spraying in order to effect weather and climatic control..

In 1986 Crispen Tickell (a high level atmospheric scientist / administrator) wrote the following in his paper “Climatic Change and World Affairs.“ which is online at :

“The first would be designed to cover all major experiments by governments (or those for whom they were responsible) which were intended to test the behaviour of the climate or which might inadvertently do so. There would be obvious problems over the definition of what should count as a major experiment. This difficulty arose in the negotiation of the Convention on the Prohibition of Military or any other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques of 1977: how should we interpret “... environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects ...“?

http://www.crispintickell.com/page77.html

It is important to note if you actually look up the Convention on the Prohibition of Military and any other hostile Use of Environmental Modification Technique (a UN Paper) - it will state right in the framework agreement that weather modification is permitted (as long as it is for peaceful purposes).

http://www.opcw.org/html/db/cwc/more/enmod.html

Crispin if you actuall take the time to read his ‘call for action’ you will quckly see a number of high level weather modification experiments that have been conducted in the past - he specifically mentions the following..

“Examples of activities which should come within this category are experiments in rainmaking and control of hail storms over a defined area; attempts to disperse hurricanes and typhoons; systematic towing of icebergs away from polar waters to supply fresh water to arid regions; and putting certain objects into space (such as the needles placed in orbit by the United States several years ago against protests from many scientists). Some such experiments might be of scientific value and economic benefit, and might deserve full international encouragement and support. The purpose of an agreement would not be to frustrate them, but simply to ensure that their implications were properly considered and understood in time. “

Think about what you just read,

1. Examples of activities (weather modification) were listed as follows.
- Towing Iceburgs
- Water diversion
- Cloud Seeding to trigger rain or control of hail storms
- NEEDLES PLACED IN ORBIT.

Hold on here, did you just read that correctly, he is talking about orbital satellites that can effect weather modification, and that many scientists were highly opposed to this.  What is this ‘needles placed in orbit’ bit - by the US (probably the military)

You see the information is all there, just go to the top of our scientific circles and read what they wrote.

US Militarys Plan for Total Weather Dominance.

Barnes, a consultant on the Air Force study, calmly outlined the history of the U.S. military’s weather modification programs and what would be needed for future fully-integrated weather modification capabilities. The good doctor referenced the document “Spacecast 2020,“ later updated in “Weather As A Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025,“ which noted that “Atmospheric scientists have pursued terrestrial weather modification in earnest since the 1940’s. . . . Space presents us with a new arena, technology provides new opportunities. . . “

While Spacecast 2020 had analyzed “the difficulty, cost and risk of developing a weather control system for military applications” as “extremely high,“ Barnes offered a different perspective. He saw “opportunities to capitalize on investment militarily [as] Medium/High” while the “Political implications/health hazards [were] Medium/Low.“

http://www.willthomas.net/chemtrails/Articles/Weather_Warfare.htm

in 2007 it got better a secretive bill was passed establishing a 11 member panel - and the Bill was stated as follows ““Weather Mitigation Research and Development Policy Authorization Act of 2007”

Here are some details of it : bills were not referred to Committees on Agriculture, Natural Resources, the Environmental Protection Agency, or Forestry, and that you were not invited to debate the merits of these bills by your elected representatives.

“It is the purpose of this act to develop and implement a comprehensive and coordinated national weather mitigation policy and a national cooperative Federal and State program of weather mitigation and research.”

http://www.newswithviews.com/Peterson/rosalind8.htm

summerops77 - 23 May 2008 03:52 AM

There is substantive proof of a long history of weather modification, and climatic control, as well as chemtrail spraying in order to effect weather and climatic control..

For weather/climate modification, you need look no further than Wikipedia to see its long history. That weather modification is practised does not prove anything either way about chemtrails.

It is important to note if you actually look up the Convention on the Prohibition of Military and any other hostile Use of Environmental Modification Technique (a UN Paper) - it will state right in the framework agreement that weather modification is permitted (as long as it is for peaceful purposes).

Because it is very hard to conduct peaceful weather modification over any territory but your own. You will probably see some large scale attempts at weather modification this summer, at the Beijing Olympics.

Hold on here, did you just read that correctly, he is talking about orbital satellites that can effect weather modification, and that many scientists were highly opposed to this.  What is this ‘needles placed in orbit’ bit - by the US (probably the military)

He said needles, not satellites, and while technically anything in orbit around the Earth is a satellite, nothing he has said indicates any form of weather control machine in orbit above us. Also, that it was ‘probably’ the military is an unproven assertion on your part. Most, if not all, environmental and Earth resources satellites are civilian, so if it was an experiment in weather or climate modification, probably this one was too.

You see the information is all there, just go to the top of our scientific circles and read what they wrote.

Yes, and what they wrote is in itself innocuous, it’s what you added to it that sounds suspicious.

Chemtrails again?

I know! No matter how much disinformation we seem to spread, there always seem to be a few people who won’t “buy the lie” and drop the subject like we want them to!

Do you think they suspect something?

*head desk*
No, please, no…

Apparently, Crispin has also invented time-travel:

This seminal book was first published in 1977, having been written the previous year while the author was on sabbatical from the Foreign Office as a Fellow at the Centre for International Affairs at Harvard University. It was published by the Centre and the University Press of America. The second edition, which represented a substantial revision and update, was published in 1966.

http://www.crispintickell.org/page77.html

The OP is also a word-for-word copy of http://main.anomalicresearch.com/?p=161 (and there’s no such word as ‘anomalic’).

Yeah, they have a habit of spam-posting across multiple sites, which is why so few of them actually respond to criticism.  They don’t have the time or inclination to read all the sites they post to.

You should change it to read:

There is substantive proof of

[CENSORED BY ORDER OF THE DHS]

Just to see what they do.

Conspiracists tend not to have a sense of humor about such things.  That would ‘prove’ that I was part of the elite, and nothing would ever convince him otherwise. 

Is that so bad? It’s probably the nearest either of us are ever going to get to joining ‘The Elite’. We can’t all be fast-tracked superconspirators like Accipiter.

Have fun summerops77:
http://www.chembuster.us/chembuster.htm