Allopathy can not even list 10 medecines which were used 200 years back which are still used being today. So in your own words, shall we conclude allopathy is not a science
Actually, off the top of my head:
morphine (early 1800s)
digitalis (since ancient times)
atropine(ditto)
and if I can name three without looking anything up, I’m sure there are more.
Homeopathic medicines (prepared from many natural substances such as herbs and minerals) used in the times (200 yrs back) of Dr. Samuel Hahnemann (father of homeopathy) are used even today because of their efficacy. They have been tried and tested on healthy human beings. They are known, trusted, and reliable.
Allopathy can not even list 10 medecines which were used 200 years back which are still used being today. So in your own words, shall we conclude allopathy is not a science
You obviously didn’t read my words. The fact that we no longer use dangerous and less effective drugs that were used 200 years ago shows that science is self corrected. Science changes (advances). Homeopathy is much more like the revealed truths of religion.
The reason these homeo “medicines” are still in use is because the reason for using them is not based on evidence. That is, it is not scientific. They are still in use regardless of (or in spite of) the evidence.
And your continued assertion that homeopathy is effective is an example of begging the question. In other words, in arguing in favor of homeopathy your main argumentative technique is to assert that it is effective. When asked for proof, you fail miserably.
Allopathy has no other option other than to change itsel because of the side effects of medicine.
Ok, we’ve now split off another thread for the allopathy vs homeopathy discussion. We don’t need to continue it here. This thread is now ONLY about the discussion of Head-On.
The stuffis overhyped to the Nth degree, and is effective only as a placebo effect with the possibility raised of evaporative cooling releiving smptoms.
