samvado - 05 June 2007 12:34 PM
The core DNA in the nucleus does not contain enough triplets to code all the aminoacid-sequences that make up all the AA based structures in the human body.
There are 20 amino acids. Only eleven of those are made by the human body. They are made through transcription from the DNA. So all those proteins are based merely on arrangements of eleven simple molecules.
evidence: look at the Human Genome Project’s results. NOT ENOUGH means not enough - no matter how you rationalize it.
About 97% of the human genome has been designated as “junk”, including most sequences within introns and most intergenic DNA.
I have. Have you? “Genes comprise only about 2% of the human genome; the remainder consists of noncoding regions, whose functions may include providing chromosomal structural integrity and regulating where, when, and in what quantity proteins are made. The human genome is estimated to contain 20,000-25,000 genes.” You seem to be under the impression that the remaining 98% does nothing, which isn’t true.
regarding birds and feathers and wings - all none flying birds today are believed to have regressed genetically from flying species.
Could you clarify that a bit? You’re saying two contradictory things at once.
a flying dog is not the same as a bird - it has a very different “flying” apparatus. both move thru air but thats it. helicopters and airplanes both move thru air.
Yes. . .and?
It is really bending logic and probability to seriously state a half-ready wing would be any advantage over a functioning arm/hand.
What’s useful is useful when it is useful. What use are gills in the middle of a dry plain in the Sahara? Not much. But in the water, they’re sure handy. What use is a half-ready wing when you’re trying to type on the keyboard? Not much. What use is it when you’re running along tree branches trying to keep your balance? Then it could be useful.
I may have been wrong in my evaluation of the validity of string theory (although I dont think so), but I know my biology 
Having gone through several universities and then worked (quite successfully) in biochemistry and genetics, I think I might have some slight grasp of it, too. . .and not just from reading the latest popular science books, either. . .
remote viewing works - I know that to be a fact from my own experience (we have a strong RV community here in north germany). I have seen results that where incredible. all targets are double blind meaning no-one in the room even knows the content of ANY of the envelopes in the room. repeatedly structures have been recogized - not good enough for anyone to find the real world target but good enough to know that the photo in question was represented - I would love to show pictures but have to use words: e.g. a building had a particular front entrance and this was depicted in a way a child would have drawn it - but that viewer had no clue that even a building would be on the picture at all. aynthing (!!) could have been on the picture. there are MANY such examples and the statistical likelyhood of lucky guesses is almost nil.
Yet for some reason, they can never actually seem to show off this proof, nor make any use of their abilities. . .
about police (as only ONE state agency) using psy read this:
http://www.crimelibrary.com/criminal_mind/forensics/psychics/11.html
“Thus far, a psychic’s reliability for law enforcement has not been established. Anecdotal information is sometimes impressive and even surprising, but nothing can be concluded about using psychics as resources in solving a crime.” Yes? And a report showing that psychics haven’t been shown to contribute to police work, and that cases in which psychics were involved were solved not by the psychics but by regular police procedures. . .this supports you how, exactly?
now ask yourself: the RV community at the NSA was active for ~10 years - it was funded the entire time - if NOTHING had come from it ???
the results may well have been not good enough to further finance it - but without initially promising results there would not have been that kind of funding - I only present that argument for the die-hards I know RV to work from my own experience as I mentioned.
And if it had worked, it wouldn’t have been cancelled, would it?
Now what about the UFO issue - has anyone looked at disclosureproject.org and is ready to debunk the witnesses presented there?
OHMYGOD - faster that light travel, telepathy as a matter of COURSE and not the exception, space faring species that are genetically compatible to humans - ohmygod - where does THAT leave Darwin.
Ummm. . .it has absolutely nothing to do with Darwin.
