4) psychic phenomena have been proven STATISTICALLY beyond any reasonable doubt - over an over again - so much so the CIA and NSA use it as a matter of course (and books have been written about that too - maybe you should read a bit more?)
The CIA and Pentagon dropped their psychic research programs for lack of results, so much for ‘beyond all doubt’. No doubt you can point me to a couple of peer-reviewed papers demonstrating this statistical proof? Because nearly all the ones I’ve seen (where they bothered to record any statistics at all), do the usual trick of testing a thousand people, finding those few individuals who did substantially better than chance, and then touting their results as ‘statistically significant’ (hint: not if you use the original sample size). More commonly, ‘researchers’ test one supposed psychic, don’t look for or control for trickery, then claim there is no other explanation.
5) Randi is a crook who has evaded paying out numerous times and lawsuits have been had because of that - and guess what - books have been written about it.
No doubt you can provide references to these lawsuits then. Though there would seem to be little point as, since Randi’s $1 million prize is still being offered, he obviously won them.
6) UFOs have been debunked numerous times - in fact any skeptic worth its salt has raved against UFOs - today 400 government witnesses have come forward ready to testfy under oath before congress that they have worked with UFOs and ETBs (disclosureproject.org) and the French government has finaly made its UFO related files public (in french) and the british consider doing likewise.
what in fact is the difference between a skeptic and a fundamentalist? none it appears - both have a closed loop they call mind. no new info enters there that possibly conflicts with in-loop-info. we can only wait until the last one has died. someone has said that before me and written in a book about it.
UFOs are unidentified flying objects, but that not every ‘flying object’ seen can always be positively identified is a trivial truth. All air-forces routinely record sightings whether identified or not. If you wish to assert that the sightings that are not explained are extraterrestrial vehicles, you must provide the proof.
Science works by assimilating new data and has done so for at least the last two hundred years. Theories that cannot explain the new data, such as classical mechanics, are either abandoned or restricted to the limited domains in which they remain useful approximations.
Ironically, it is you who rejected modern science, all the evidence for evolution, relativity, quantum mechanics matters not one whit to you because it is the product of people who would apply the same critical thinking that led them to these conclusions to your own pet beliefs, with devestating results.
Skeptics demand evidence, that none is forthcoming (certainly you have declined to provide any) is not proof that the phenomena in question is false, but it certainly isn’t proof that it is true.