You’d think Tim, of all people, would recognise ‘not answering someone’s question’ when he sees it.
And, of course, if he knows the answer, then why ask in the first place?
I just assumed it was yet another thing he had no idea about…

Boo - 27 February 2008 12:57 PM

I just assumed it was yet another thing he had no idea about…

Same here…

I just finished reading the whole stinking post and was kind of disappointed that nobody else picked up on the fact that he is planning on selling training in the now to help you become a more effective ghost/spirit in the afterlife!

Yes my goal is to train experience patients on a machine that can communicate with our thoughts now, on how to be highly qualified ghost for trying to make this happen in the future….

Several times he wrote that with his financial qualifications, almost any current money making venture should want to invest in more than the “cheap version” if they want to make lots of money and take control of the interface mechanism!

Do you understand the up side for companies like pay-pal, who would make out on this deal if it happened, and they also know I have experience with financial companies, so I must be a good investment.

People do not get anything unless you can paint them a picture.

What has more value

If I am right, or if I am wrong?

If I never suggest it, or if I did?

Thank you for reading my cheap version,
Tim

There is no up or downside for this guy.  All he has to do is point people at this post and say “See, they think it can happen.” and he thinks the money will come rolling in!

Pretty slick.  That goes to why he wants it in the wiki and on his own web page.  He doesn’t really care that what you say to him, as long as you sound intelligent saying it! (That way when he points someone to this thread, they are bored out of their minds and, refusing to admit they didn’t read every last word, will nod their heads at his psycho-babble.)

Another thing he is/may be doing is attempting to see if he can modify your responses to his posts using a modification technique he gave the link for.  Almost a hoax within a hoax!  By using the techniques listed on the wiki here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_control_theory

I have the sneaking suspicion this is some sort of graduate level study on the effects of this theorum/technique…...
After all, who wouldn’t want to say “Gotcha! You’ve just been hoaxed!” to what purports to be a debunking hoaxes site?!

Either this guy is dribbling into his glass delusional, or he’s slick as hell.

(....sitting back in his chair slowly stroking his goatee…..)

I think he’s delusional.

Edit: Oh, and I also think he wants us to offer to send him money. Ain’t going to happen, though.

daveprime - 01 March 2008 09:56 PM

I just finished reading the whole stinking post and was kind of disappointed that nobody else picked up on the fact that he is planning on selling training in the now to help you become a more effective ghost/spirit in the afterlife!

Yes my goal is to train experience patients on a machine that can communicate with our thoughts now, on how to be highly qualified ghost for trying to make this happen in the future….

Several times he wrote that with his financial qualifications, almost any current money making venture should want to invest in more than the “cheap version” if they want to make lots of money and take control of the interface mechanism!

Do you understand the up side for companies like pay-pal, who would make out on this deal if it happened, and they also know I have experience with financial companies, so I must be a good investment.

People do not get anything unless you can paint them a picture.

What has more value

If I am right, or if I am wrong?

If I never suggest it, or if I did?

Thank you for reading my cheap version,
Tim

There is no up or downside for this guy.  All he has to do is point people at this post and say “See, they think it can happen.” and he thinks the money will come rolling in!

Pretty slick.  That goes to why he wants it in the wiki and on his own web page.  He doesn’t really care that what you say to him, as long as you sound intelligent saying it! (That way when he points someone to this thread, they are bored out of their minds and, refusing to admit they didn’t read every last word, will nod their heads at his psycho-babble.)

Another thing he is/may be doing is attempting to see if he can modify your responses to his posts using a modification technique he gave the link for.  Almost a hoax within a hoax!  By using the techniques listed on the wiki here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_control_theory

I have the sneaking suspicion this is some sort of graduate level study on the effects of this theorum/technique…...
After all, who wouldn’t want to say “Gotcha! You’ve just been hoaxed!” to what purports to be a debunking hoaxes site?!

Either this guy is dribbling into his glass delusional, or he’s slick as hell.

(....sitting back in his chair slowly stroking his goatee…..)

Jesus you managed to read ALL his stuff?

I got halfway through the first one and went back to making balloon animals.

daveprime - 01 March 2008 09:56 PM

Stuff

Ah!  Now he’s going to think there’s interest and start posting again.

NNNNNOOOOOoooooooooooooooooo!

*Runs crying form the room*

Tim4848 - 26 February 2008 11:49 AM

What is the average life span of a human?

A human’s average lifespan would be (the total number of years they have lived)/(the total number of times they have lived). Hence Winston Churchill’s average lifespan was 90 years, while Mozart’s average lifespan was 34 years.

I think Shirley MacClaine’s is currently (73+39/2 =) 56, but it changes depending on who she’s claiming to be a reincarnation of this week.

Tim4848 - 26 February 2008 07:11 PM

Try saying that ten times back wards.

Why? Will it make any more sense that way?

(whistles loudly)

Here Buddy!! Here Buddy!!  C’mon, Here Boy!!

(Stands quietly….waits for a few minutes listening….shrugs and goes back into the house…)

*edited for objectionable content by author*  *sorry*

Let this thread die please?