David B. - 11 July 2007 03:59 AM

Ghost’s have conferences?!

Is there a list of speakers spookers available? Do they have field trips to unhaunted houses?

I don’t know, but I want to live in a world where they do!

MadCarlotta - 11 July 2007 07:08 AM

I don’t know, but I want to live in a world where they do!

Tonight on HBOO...

19:30 America’s Least Haunted,
20:30 My So-called Afterlife,
21:00 Six Feet Under,
22:00 PSI: Miami,
23:00 Film: The Winter Ghost,
00:50 Film: Ghoul, Interrupted.

David B. - 11 July 2007 07:46 AM

MadCarlotta - 11 July 2007 07:08 AM

I don’t know, but I want to live in a world where they do!

Tonight on HBOO...

19:30 America’s Least Haunted,
20:30 My So-called Afterlife,
21:00 Six Feet Under,
22:00 PSI: Miami,
23:00 Film: The Winter Ghost,
00:50 Film: Ghoul, Interrupted.

Don’t forget that they’re showing the horror movie Alive.

You two just made my day!

Tah - 11 July 2007 01:07 PM

David B. - 11 July 2007 07:46 AM

MadCarlotta - 11 July 2007 07:08 AM

I don’t know, but I want to live in a world where they do!

Tonight on HBOO...

19:30 America’s Least Haunted,
20:30 My So-called Afterlife,
21:00 Six Feet Under,
22:00 PSI: Miami,
23:00 Film: The Winter Ghost,
00:50 Film: Ghoul, Interrupted.

Don’t forget that they’re showing the horror movie Alive.

And the love story “Dawn of the Dead”

gray - 11 July 2007 02:30 PM

And the love story “Dawn of the Dead”

Yes, a man could quite go to pieces over Dawn!

I’m glad to see everybody is still here.

Maybe people are finally starting to understand, just like this person does:

“I understand. I even took the time to understand because I wanted to. It is certainly in my best interest to understand because if I find myself dead and still thinking I want to know what my options are.”

It never hurts to have a back up plan.

I wonder if there would be anything wrong with asking one of the patients of BrainGate, to try my idea and see if they could put pressure on the doctors to take it to the next level.

Thank you,
Tim

To whom it may concern,

I am trying to build a home web site and forum, please check it out and help me with it.

http://www.freewebs.com/tim4848/

Thank you,
Tim

Sure, how about some words of encouragement…

“Come on, Tim!”

(Apologies to everyone who doesn’t get this.)

David B. - 16 July 2007 03:48 AM

Sure, how about some words of encouragement…

“Come on, Tim!”

(Apologies to everyone who doesn’t get this.)

Dear David B,

Thank you for those kind words and thank you for the math at the end of your reply as well, because that is what I am thinking is going to change my idea into a reality.

I am going to prove my idea based on other people mistakes with inductive reasoning in the weeks to come. My goal is to give each one I find a number, then we can add them up and see what we come up with.

I really don’t think these things up, they just come to me naturally.

Inductive reasoning
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Induction (philosophy))
Jump to: navigation, search
Inductive reasoning is the complement of deductive reasoning. For other article subjects named induction, see Induction.
Induction or inductive reasoning, sometimes called inductive logic, is the process of reasoning in which the premises of an argument are believed to support the conclusion but do not ensure it. It is used to ascribe properties or relations to types based on tokens (i.e., on one or a small number of observations or experiences); or to formulate laws based on limited observations of recurring phenomenal patterns. Induction is used, for example, in using specific propositions such as:

This ice is cold.
A billiard ball moves when struck with a cue.
...to infer general propositions such as:

All ice is cold.
All billiard balls struck with a cue move.

Thank you,
Tim

Inductive reasoning is a dangerous method of creating a theory due to its very nature.

Inductive reasoning is notoriously unrelaible at coming to conclusions and lacks any logical structure. David Hume noted in his treatise of induction that the generalisations it throws up are only practical if the induction is constant. The future MUST resemble the past for the whole thing to work. Inductive reasoning is different from deductive reasoning, which is scientifically favoured because of its logic. Inductive reasoning does not allow for deviations or anything which can prove the theory wrong.

And as Karl Popper said, in research, anything that supports the theory is useless. You should seek to find data to disagree with it- if you can’t do it your theory must be correct.

Induction does not allow this.