Excellent questions. If I don’t provide a link for something and you doubt it and would like verification, you can search the relevant key words or ask me- your questions seem sincere.
“Unanswered questions” means “unanswered questions”. The 9/11 Family Steering Committee came together from 12 9/11 family members who wanted accountability for the intelligence and defense failures without which 9/11 couldn’t have succeeded. While the final statement of the group is innocuous, the group disbanded at the end of the hearings. At the “1 year later” hearings held by McKinney, Lori Van Auken said, “One such statement was that 9 /11 was a failure of imagination: a failure of whose imagination? What exactly does that mean? When you have a CIA Director with his hair on fire, a system blinking red, 52 FAA warnings, an August 6, 2001 PDB entitled ``Bin Laden Determined to Strike in the United States,’’ leads on several 9 /11 hijackers.. warnings from many foreign governments, a Phoenix memo, warning of Islamic extremists taking flying lessons, the arrest of would-be terrorists Zacarias Moussaoui, facts imparted to one agent, Agent Frasca, at the RFU of the FBI, 9 /11 was truly a failure, all right, but I would certainly not call it a failure of imagination”.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query this is the link to the 9/11 search return, so you can check the hearings on Able Danger as well- Atta was identified a year before the attacks and considered a threat- several involved personnel have testifed and the Pentagon has attempted to destroy their careers and block the investigation. This is former FBI Director Louis Freeh’s statement on Able Danger and the 9/11 Commission.
June 24, 2005, thru 9/11 Citizens Watch, the Jersey Girls released this statement:
Of the 52% of Americans who knew WTC7 collapsed, 3 out of 4 think it should’ve been investigated- I’m one of them- I find it suspicious that the govt says fire collapsed a building with massive steel columns on the perimeter and 24 even bigger ones in the center, with redundant, asymetric cross trusses, engineered to support loads 5 times greater than it had to bear- collapsed it to the ground into its own footprint at almost free fall speed- without a miracle- or controlled demolition, which would mean 9/11 was an inside job. Watch video of WTC7 collapsing:
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/videos/index.html#building7 Look around this site- this is considered one of the most credible on controlled demolition by the biggest activists in the 9/11 Truth Movement. WTC 1 and 2 were just as solid, engineered to withstand multiple 707 crashes. They could’ve made mistakes in the design and construction, but many, many people looked at and signed off on it. Look at the pictures of the construction, and look at the videos of the collapse; what’s turning all that concrete and steel into a rapidly inflating dust cloud? They didn’t collapse, they were disintegrated. Then there’s all the Firemen and WTC employees who reported hearing, seeing and feeling explosions and the effects of explosions.
These things are more tangible than a scholar’s paper, but Dr. Jones has won over many intellectual people who are smart enough to weigh the data and methods he’s used. Check out his paper for pics and video of the molten metal pouring out of the side of one of the towers, if the molten metal found in the wreckage weeks later doesn’t make you suspicious.
In my own opinioin, and that of a growing number of Americans who review what’s been told and not told about 9/11, there is an overwhelming prima facie case for a new investigation. And considering they lied and said “no one could’ve imagined” and there were “no specific warnings”, when it has since come out that there were lots of very specific warnings and clues building into a “summer of threat”- the word was all over the middle eastern community in NYC- 2 gradeschool boys told their classes the towers were coming down a week before the attacks. Then the air defense failures coincidentally happened on a day with numerous war games taking up resources and confusing the events, at least one of which had a scenario of hijacked planes crashing into the WTC and the Pentagon, etc. etc.- there is really no chance that it’s not an inside job. This means we are in the midst of a Constitutional crisis; the Republic has been hijacked and the powers of government are in the hands of mass murderers and Congress and the Media are complicit in covering it up. People have talked already, like former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, the most gagged person in American history, who has said the American people have not heard who the real culprit is behind 9/11. Her allegations were confirmed by the FBI’s IG and the Joint Intel Committee investigation of 9/11, but she’s only a footnote in the Report; why did the Commission omit her testimony? In regards to Able Danger, they’ve said “it didn’t fit with the story we wanted to tell”.
THE TOP 40 REASONS TO DOUBT THE OFFICIAL STORY OF SEPTEMBER 11th, 2001
115 ommissions and distortions of the 9/11 Commission Report
Complete 9/11 Timeline- Mainstream sources, only.