Howitzer - 25 July 2011 12:34 AM
The Van Allen radiation belts are a good starting point for why the moon landings were faked. Humans would need massive radiation protection to make it to the moon. The spaceships had virtually zero protection.
Nope. This argument is so old and so bad, it’s been debunked decades ago. It’s already been discussed a number of times on this very website. It’s just wrong. It would be nice if conspiracy theorists would bother to actually look at information, rather than simply repeating the exact same wrong claims decade after decade.
Biblethumper222222 - 25 July 2011 01:54 PM
Yes indeed. The rocks were petrified wood.
They would use pieces of petrified wood to fake moon rocks? That would just be stupid. And seeing as how a good bit of the moon rock was made available for public scrutiny and bears absolutely no resemblance to petrified wood, that makes your claim a little hard to support.
The Astro NOTS came back, resigned,
No, they didn’t.
never talked about it again,
Yes they did. Often and repeatedly. They even wrote books about it and went on television.
when asked about the moon, they said ‘lets talk about ‘MARS’ and hoofed Bart Sibrel in the butt for asking questions.
They forget we paid for the trips to the moon thru the radiation belt in tin jalopies and we get to ask questions. They are pre paid for.
Watch this
Moon…haha
You seem to be under a considerable number of mistaken ideas involving the moon missions and the astronauts. In fact, your ideas are basically the exact opposite of reality. Perhaps you should try reading a real book about them? Such as one of the books that they themselves wrote, and that you seem to be totally unaware of?
