Yes, because they don’t look exactly the same doesn’t mean they are. Lighting, background, camera angle, etc will all play a part in the picture.
The lenght of the eye socket, of the skull, the colors, I see differences that can’t be explained by camera angle or lightning.
there’s nothing wrong with A.F. Hilal’s demeanor in front of the camera ?
Is there something right with it? Could you elaborate on this?
In a different way, his on-camera testimony is as unconvincing as Baturin’s own.
While the official story does seem to be a bit garbled that is not enough to make me think it’s an alien.
I do not make the claim that it was an alien. I didn’t write that anywhere. The figurine hypothesis is still first. My claim is that the police investigation failed to demonstrate that it was a figurine and left the questions of origin & nature unanswered.
This is backwoods Russia.
Could you elaborate on this?