Robin Bobcat - 26 June 2008 01:18 AM

Bah. Not one for the ‘leet’ speak, huh?

*ahem*

‘I find the concept of elite sheep amusing, and feel that they are quite excellent in all regards, to the point that punctuation suffers in my exuberance’

I never was much good at puzzles and deciphering offbeat lingo.  I’m assuming your exuberance is accompanied by smacking lips and a puddle of drool??

Obama’s VP Biden friend of McCain = Obama used to get a crowd for McCain at church’s “debate” = Obama used to sell 1 pct McCain as a “serious” loser to Clinton.

Palin to get some people in the otherwise max. 1000 people audience of McCain.
After all he is polled at almost 50 pct…

Okaaay. . .this time I haven’t even a clue as to anything that this guy is writing about.  And of course he’s not likely to try to actually explain anything.

You know, I don’t think that it can be a coincidence that so many of these conspiracy theorists are so utterly incoherent.  I wonder if they do it to make it so much harder for people to disagree with them?  After all, if you don’t know what somebody is saying it is difficult to disagree with them.

*pokes Acci*

Finish your sentences, unless you’re talking about Candlejack.

*looks around furtively*

*hides under couch*

Robin Bobcat - 02 September 2008 06:11 PM

*pokes Acci*

Finish your sentences, unless you’re talking about Candlejack.

*looks around furtively*

*hides under couch*

Strange. . .it cut off the last half of my message.  Aaaaaaaaaaa!  It’s a conspiracy!  Alex is plotting against us all!

*goes into proper ConspiraSpeak*

Alex Boese San Diego = Newfoundland kraken = square root of twenty-seven!!!!

Just think of the letter openers!!!!!!

Who, How and Why explained long ago:  http://www.elvis.com/

BigLieTechnique - 04 October 2008 03:39 PM

October satanic celebrations: launch of Obama impeachment scheduled for ...
MOD EDIT

Okay. . .this time you’re being even more incoherent than usual, BLT.  What connection is there between Barak Obama and O.J. Simpson?  And there’s no sign of anybody starting up impeachment hearings for Obama.  I notice that you very carefully did not mention when this impeachment is supposedly scheduled to take place. . .

By the way, you seem to have forgotten a few things:

http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/forums/viewthread/7766/#319177
http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/forums/viewthread/7435/P77/#319176

Is there any particular reason why you’re reluctant to actually discuss the topics that you introduce or support?

(Sorry Acci, now this post isn’t going to make a whole lot of sense.  - Maegan)

Accipiter - 04 October 2008 08:01 PM

I notice that you very carefully did not mention when this impeachment is supposedly scheduled to take place. . .

Choose the date

October 5, 1998
The House Judiciary Committee votes to launch a congressional impeachment inquiry against President Clinton.

October 8, 1998
The House of Representatives vote for impeachment proceedings to begin against Clinton. The House judiciary committee will be given wide powers to draw up detailed charges against Mr Clinton, based on 11 allegations by the independent counsel Kenneth Starr in his report on the Monica Lewinsky affair.

October 14, 1998
The House judiciary committee chairman Henry Hyde announces the impeachment inquiry will concentrate its focus on two core charges: that Mr Clinton lied under oath and attempted to obstruct justice.

BigLieTechnique - 04 October 2008 03:39 PM

October satanic celebrations: launch of Obama impeachment scheduled for ...

Kyoon - 05 October 2008 06:14 AM

Accipiter - 04 October 2008 08:01 PM

I notice that you very carefully did not mention when this impeachment is supposedly scheduled to take place. . .

October 5, 1998
. . .impeachment inquiry against President Clinton.

October 8, 1998
. . .impeachment proceedings to begin against Clinton.

October 14, 1998
. . .the impeachment inquiry will concentrate its focus on two core charges: that Mr Clinton. . .

Wow.  Bill Clinton and Barak Obama are the same person (Billak Clibama?)!  That must have been one heck of a tanning bed!  And have we gone into a time warp back to pre-October 1998, or are you just for some reason using the Islamic dating of the year (in which case you must be expecting Billak Clibama to live a long, long time, since we’re currently only into the early 15th Century AH)?

And Kyoon, why are you hiding from those other topics that you yourself introduced, such as the Usain Bolt one?  Have you admitted to yourself that you were totally wrong, but you’re not brave enough to admit it to anybody else?

I went to one OF BLT’s links: link edited out so no one accidentally clicks on it!
And my computer alarms went off!  Not only did it try and install a backdoor trojan, it tried to install a hostile tracking cookie!  (That and it also tried to open about SIX pop-ups!)  thank goodness for Norton Anitvirus!

That pretty much puts an end to my trying to look at what BLT claims is PROOF.

(And i think the MOD’s might want to do something as well….)
“Wonder Mod Powers ACTIVATE!“

*...Watches from the sidelines…*

DavePrime - 05 October 2008 02:59 PM

I went to one OF BLT’s links:  link edited out so no one accidentally clicks on it!

And my computer alarms went off!  Not only did it try and install a backdoor trojan, it tried to install a hostile tracking cookie!  (That and it also tried to open about SIX pop-ups!)  thank goodness for Norton Anitvirus!

That pretty much puts an end to my trying to look at what BLT claims is PROOF.

(And i think the MOD’s might want to do something as well….)
“Wonder Mod Powers ACTIVATE!“

*...Watches from the sidelines…*

And it’s not as though his links actually lead to anything substantial.  If you follow one of his links, it leads to another Matt Marriott blog that’s all done in the exact same format:  entries consisting of one or two vague and incoherent sentences, followed by “footnotes” with links that lead to yet other Matt Marriott blogs that are done in the exact same format:  entries consisting of one or two vague and incoherent sentences, followed by “footnotes” with links that lead to yet other Matt Marriott blogs that are done in the exact same format:  entries consisting of one or two vague and incoherent sentences, followed by “footnotes” with links that lead to yet other Matt Marriott blogs that are done in the exact same format. . .

And usually the blog you’re directed to doesn’t actually have anything about what the original comment’s topic.

You never actually get any information.  You’re just directed to blog after blog after blog, until you end up right where you started from.  Rather like everything else related to BLT, Matt Marriott, Kyoon, and the rest of them.