Teenager faces prosecution for calling Scientology ‘cult’
Posted: 21 May 2008 09:23 AM   [ Ignore ]
Five Star Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2490
Joined  2005-01-27

A teenager is facing prosecution for using the word “cult” to describe the Church of Scientology.

The unnamed 15-year-old was served the summons by City of London police when he took part in a peaceful demonstration opposite the London headquarters of the controversial religion.

Officers confiscated a placard with the word “cult” on it from the youth, who is under 18, and a case file has been sent to the Crown Prosecution Service.

A date has not yet been set for him to appear in court.

The decision to issue the summons has angered human rights activists and support groups for the victims of cults.

The incident happened during a protest against the Church of Scientology on May 10. Demonstrators from the anti-Scientology group, Anonymous, who were outside the church’s £23m headquarters near St Paul’s cathedral, were banned by police from describing Scientology as a cult by police because it was “abusive and insulting”.

Writing on an anti-Scientology website, the teenager facing court said: “I brought a sign to the May 10th protest that said: ‘Scientology is not a religion, it is a dangerous cult.‘

“‘Within five minutes of arriving I was told by a member of the police that I was not allowed to use that word, and that the final decision would be made by the inspector.“

A policewoman later read him section five of the Public Order Act and “strongly advised” him to remove the sign. The section prohibits signs which have representations or words which are threatening, abusive or insulting.

The teenager refused to back down, quoting a 1984 high court ruling from Mr Justice Latey, in which he described the Church of Scientology as a “cult” which was “corrupt, sinister and dangerous”.

After the exchange, a policewoman handed him a court summons and removed his sign.

On the website he asks for advice on how to fight the charge: “What’s the likelihood I’ll need a lawyer? If I do have to get one, it’ll have to come out of my pocket money.“

Writing on the same website, another anonymous demonstrator said: “We also protested outside another Scientology building in Tottenham Court Road which is policed by a separate force, the Metropolitan police, who have never tried to stop us using the word cult.

“We’re completely peaceful protesters expressing a perfectly valid opinion. This whole thing stinks.“

Liberty director, Shami Chakrabarti, said: “This barmy prosecution makes a mockery of Britain’s free speech traditions.

“After criminalising the use of the word ‘cult’, perhaps the next step is to ban the words ‘war’ and ‘tax’ from peaceful demonstrations?“

Ian Haworth, from the Cult Information Centre which provides advice for victims of cults and their families, said: “This is an extraordinary situation. If it wasn’t so serious it would be farcical. The police’s job is to protect and serve. Who is being served and who is being protected in this situation? I find it very worrying.

“Scientology is well known to my organisation, and has been of great concern to me for 22 years. I get many calls from families with loved ones involved and ex-members who are in need of one form of help.“

The City of London police came under fire two years ago when it emerged that more than 20 officers, ranging from constable to chief superintendent, had accepted gifts worth thousands of pounds from the Church of Scientology.

The City of London Chief Superintendent, Kevin Hurley, praised Scientology for “raising the spiritual wealth of society” during the opening
of its headquarters in 2006.

Last year a video praising Scientology emerged featuring Ken Stewart, another of the City of London’s chief superintendents, although he is not a member of the group.

The group was founded by the science-fiction writer L Ron Hubbard in 1952 and espouses the idea that humans are descended from an exiled race of aliens called Thetans.

The church continues to attract controversy over claims that it separates members from their families and indoctrinates followers.

A spokeswoman for the force said today: “City of London police had received complaints about demonstrators using the words ‘cult’ and ‘Scientology kills’ during protests against the Church of Scientology.

“Following advice from the Crown Prosecution Service some demonstrators were warned verbally and in writing that their signs breached section five of the Public Order Act.

“One demonstrator continued to display a placard despite police warnings and was reported for an offence under section five. A file on the case will go to the CPS.“

A CPS spokesman said no specific advice was given to police regarding the boy’s placard.

“In April, prior to this demonstration, as part of our normal working relationship we gave the City of London police general advice on the law around demonstrations and religiously aggravated crime in particular.

“We did not advise on this specific case prior to the summons being issued – which the police can do without reference to us – but if we receive a file we will review it in the normal way according to the code for crown prosecutors.“


Source

 Signature 

He who knows history will not see anything new. Only variations.(Beasjt-2007)
You can’t fetch far enough to beat reality.(Beasjt-2006)
A good search is never a waste of time.(Beasjt-2007)
My carma ran over my dogma
Real men don´t RTFM.
I´m mythchiefious.

Trust me.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 21 May 2008 09:26 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Five Star Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4224
Joined  2005-06-05

I think he should be prosecuted for calling Scientology a cult. That is not the correct spelling!

 Signature 

Good science prunes away bad ideas.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 21 May 2008 09:26 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Five Star Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  17839
Joined  2006-03-29

Aren’t they a cult?  And if it was the kids opinion that they were a cult, I don’t see how that is a prosecutable offense.

“He called me a name, I am going to sue!“  The world is turning into a bunch of pansies.

 Signature 

What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.    Ralph Waldo Emerson

6077156066-8933432345-4385489843

you are a stud-muffin…[Boo, 2008]

Silence is GOLDEN, Duct tape is SILVER…cheaper and more efficient.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 21 May 2008 10:57 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Five Star Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2656
Joined  2005-10-21

It seems to be $cientology’s modus operandi.. Keep the lawyers on speed dial with the forms already filled out in case anyone insults their ‘religion’...

 Signature 

Lingua Latina
    Est mortuissima
          Romanos olim necavit
              Iam vere me necat

What part of ‘meow’ don’t you understand?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 21 May 2008 12:10 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  847
Joined  2005-06-15

It is silly to make so much trouble for this kid.  He is making his opinion known. A criminal case is senseless and stupid.  Just keep in mind that the church itself is within its rights to go into civil procedings.  Although that would be silly to many people also.  Any group of people need to keep in mind that there will be others who disagree.

 Signature 

I had to stop with him.  He was a (gasp…) a vegan.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 May 2008 05:38 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Five Star Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1200
Joined  2008-03-22

0_o good point..Whats scientology? isnt that like battlefield earth or something? cause that movie sucked…

 Signature 

Why does spellcheck hate me?
GO HERE
“When one thing is a thing the other thing is also a thing bt more of a thing then the last thing multiplied to the value of pi, Whats the point of what i just said? The other thing is tastier than Pi”
Im lonely downer

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 May 2008 05:52 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Five Star Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4224
Joined  2005-06-05

***Breaking News***

It is not offensive to call Scientology a cult.:

[quote author=“BBC News”]No charges over Scientology demo

Legal action has been dropped against a 15-year-old who faced prosecution for branding Scientology a “cult”. The teenager held up a sign which read, “Scientology is not a religion, it is a dangerous cult”, in May outside its headquarters in the City of London. City of London Police said they had received complaints and warned the teenager to get rid of the sign as it breached the Public Order Act.

[...]

A Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) spokesman said: “In consultation with the City of London Police, we were asked whether the sign was abusive or insulting. “Our advice is that it is not abusive or insulting and there is no offensiveness (as opposed to criticism), neither in the idea expressed nor in the mode of expression.“

[Linky]

Now that we know “cult” is neither abusive nor insulting, it open a whole new avenue of uses for the word.

Peon: “Hey, Boss, here’s the report you asked for, you “cult”!“
Boss: “What did you just call me?“
Peon: “A cult.“
Boss: “Er, I thought you said…“
Peon: “What?“
Boss: “Nevermind. Is “cult” some kind of insult now?“
Peon: “No, the Crown Prosecution Service have advised that calling something a cult is neither abusive or insulting.“
Boss: “Really?“
Peon: “Yup, really. It can even have positive connotations like in “cult comedy” or “cult performer”.“
Boss: “Oh. Well then, thanks.“
Peon: “You’re welcome.“

 Signature 

Good science prunes away bad ideas.

Profile
 
 
 
 
 
‹‹ Pilot’s prayers answered      Clever Birdie ››