New Forum | Museum of Hoaxes | Login | Register as a Member | Search

Brazilian doctors uncover ‘Michelangelo code’
Posted By:
Charybdis
in Hell
Jun 16, 2005

So who else thinks this is simply wishful thinking?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/arts_michelangelo_dc
Category: Art, Religion; Replies: 9

Comments
Listed in chronological order. Newest comments at the end.
Page 1 of 1 pages
Smerk
in to mischief
Member
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 | 10:30 PM
It sounds even more unbelievable than the Davinci Code!
LaMa
in Europe
Member
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 | 01:52 AM
I see kobolds in clouds....
Captain Al
in Alberta, Canada
Member
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 | 08:25 AM
In the article Dr. Barreto says:

"Why wasn't this ever seen before? First, because very few people have the sufficient anatomical knowledge to see these pieces like this. I do because that's my profession."

I guess we are supposed to believe Michelangelo had the equivalent anatomical knowledge of a present-day doctor. The stupidity of some people never ceases to amaze me.
Nigel
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 | 09:29 AM
I skimmed the article, but I have to ask Why would Michaelangelo do it?

As for the doctor's comment Captain Al quoted, I say....this guy's the first doctor to ever look at the Sistine Chapel's work of art?

People see what they want to see.....
Citizen Premier
in spite of public outcry
Member
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 | 11:14 AM
If the heart and the shoulder joint were in proper positions relative to eachother, then I might believe it. But since he didn't say they were, I'm sure they weren't.
stork in the absence of ceiling
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 | 04:42 PM
Well, at least it's a more interesting claim than most. Sounds like a story worth following, well, for a little while. Of course, the art world moves slowly. Wonder what Alex would call on this?
Nick
in Merrie Olde Englande
Member
Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 | 03:13 PM
"I guess we are supposed to believe Michelangelo had the equivalent anatomical knowledge of a present-day doctor. The stupidity of some people never ceases to amaze me."

from my understanding of the article Mike simply his images of organs in his paintings. it would have been no great effort for him to exhume some criminals and chop them open to peer inside. in fact, anatomy was much easier in those days as it wasnt considered bad taste to dissect criminals after their executions.
stork in the absence of floor
Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 | 08:29 PM
Sure, Nick, nowadays isn't that what they call an autopsy?
Maegan
in Tampa, FL - USA
Member
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 | 05:43 AM
People think too hard now a-days.
Page 1 of 1 pages

Name:

Email (if you want to be notified of responses):

Location:

URL:

Note: To prove that you're a human being, not an automated spam bot, you've got to type in the word you see below. If you register as a member of the site you won't have to do this. Once registered, you'll then also need to login. If you're seeing this notice, and you've already registered, that means you haven't logged in. As a member you also won't have to enter your personal info every time you leave a comment.

Submit the word you see below:


Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?