The other day my friend James showed me this picture. It was taken at an
overlook on the blueridge parkway (The star). In the middle is my friends
girl, the other 2 people are some of her friends.
Anyways there was nobody else at the overlook that night, they were alone.
She gets home and uploads the picture and check out what is in the right
side.....
Now at first I thought my friend was playing a joke on me... but I cant find
any explination for it.... its a digital camera and defiently not a double
exposure.
so here ya go, this is resized... the origional full size is the link below
the image
So I messed around with it in photoshop... and I got these. What do you
think she is holding?? it looks like she is reading a book or something.
Can ANYBODY tell me what this could be? I can not think of a logical
explination for it. Its so bizare how she is seethrough. and Judging by
the lights in the background, the camera took a pic with the flash, then
kept the shuder open for a split longer, cause of the blur... it would
almost seem like only the flash picked up on the "ghost" is my only guess.
If you notice she also seems to have a shadow?
I wouldn't believe your spelling in the 'hole' of the world!!!!!1!111!11
That's not to say it isn't true.
Mind you, I don't believe it's a ghost either.
Max
in Somewere
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 | 02:35 AM
I think it could be a real person, but nobody noticed her when you took the picture.I don't belive in gost. I belive that it could be Satan trying to scare you.
Who knows...some answers are better left unfound.
For the record, there is at least one digital camera that will allow you to make double exposures. No, I'm not saying that that is necessarily the answer to this picture, but the statement that a digital camera CAN'T allow double exposures is not entirely correct.
My camera has the option of double exposure, so you can take a picture of scenery and then yourself in it. It's called Pre-Shot, and I guess you use it so that the stranger taking your picture will get the angle right. Although I for one would never let a stranger handle this camera...
So it's really written! My friedn told me about that doll, and I was very skeptical. We were sitting by a cute-and popular guy at the time, so she would have probably made something 'cool' up. But wow. It's there. Now if only I knew the guy here was telling the truth...Very very skeptical...
Chloe
in Texas
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 | 02:34 PM
Oops! Sorry! I was talking about the eBay Possesed Stitch doll this guy bought in Orlando and it was all haunting him and stuff...very skeptical though.
Paola Hernandez
in utah
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 | 03:17 PM
okay so i saw the first picture really close and i saw the second one and if you match them you can see that the way of the skirt is ,is the same thing and the perse is the same way that the girl is holding .
Paola Hernandez
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 | 03:24 PM
sorry i didnt read the whole story by ou do know how to make up stories you rock!!!!
Carter S
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 | 10:06 AM
yeah, it's a ghost.
Something just whispered it in my ear.
KraZy
in Dallas, Tx
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 | 11:59 AM
Can ne1 tell me wat's Wally's web site? u mention it above in the comments. please and thnx.
Some one
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 | 02:34 PM
Your all nuts! ... Why am I here anyway?
Vixen
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 | 07:41 PM
Take a look at the hand of the girl on the right. Since when do you ever see a shadow cast on nothing but air? This photo has to be taken in front of a screen, because there is no way that shadow is on the ground, it's not on the right angle.
Also, the lights of the city are blurred, as mentioned earlier, whereas the girls aren't. This isn't possible if the photo was taken as it is shown here.
Is Cole Austin sure that his friend James is not playing a prank? It is possible that the photo was edited before it was shown to anyone else. Friends sometimes do mean, mean things for a laugh. Understandably, too, 'cause most of the time it's worth it! *malicious laugh*
Dan
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 | 02:25 AM
It looks to me like photo of you erased from the camera's memory has some leftover fragments, and corrupted a different photo.
As a user of photoshop who manipulated the state governors pic and placed him intimately beside a woman
he never knew, i know that photoshop can manipulate anything, anyway. Still, i think ghost photos can be real. i dont think this one is, though.
ANONYMOUS
in not mentioned
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 | 03:09 PM
wow. thats really reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally really scary ! oh my. im gonna have nightmares for life !!! slash its stupid. pathetic excuse for a ghost picture. nice try ! BYEBYE
If you really took this original picture and did not mess with it in photoshop, I hate to break your heart, but it's no ghost. I've had this happen on both regular and digital cameras, it looks creepy, but it's just double exposure. On my digital, i had some settings twisted around and some of the pics were partially overlaying the last one took. Chances are you didn't even realize you took this picture, but hit the button accidentally.
Better luck on future ghost hunts!
Otaku-maniac formerly Absinthe
in the pits of hell...muhahahaha! Member
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 | 06:52 PM
Bottom half of the ghost looks like Resurrection Mary's feet and skirt. Shes a ghost in some or other town in the US of A.
all the pics i seen are just fake
wow. thats really reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally reallyreally really scary ! oh my. im gonna have nightmares for life !!! slash its stupid. pathetic excuse for a ghost picture. nice try ! BYEBYE