Euro Spacecraft to prove or disprove moon landings
Posted By:
Winona
Mar 11, 2005
"A European spacecraft now orbiting the Moon could turn out to be a time
machine of sorts as it photographs old landing sites of Soviet robotic
probes and the areas where American Apollo crews set down and explored..."
Well, LaMa, the men in black will be around to kill us ALL, now that we know their secret.
Jeez, thanks.
leo777
in USA
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 | 07:30 PM
Hello.I saw the Fox show about the Moon hoax in 2001 on ch 5.in New York.I am too busy to do any invistigations of my own.I scanned the Internet and listened to both sites.
There are just too much evidence that it was a hoax.
The biggest prove that it had never happened is that Russians never did it.
They say that they gave up because it was too late.Being the second is not the same as being the first.
Nonesense.
What about "We can do it too".
Also after so many such a complicated missions there were no casualties.
On the contrary there were fatal accidents on Earth.4 of 11 Appollo members died within 7 years after their space missions.Not of radiation-exposure.Actually none of them ever developed any of those ,concidering the fact they had to pass the heavy radiation belt in order to reach the Moon.
WE never know what the truth is.The Whole History of the World is A Big Hoax.
"There are just too much evidence that it was a hoax." - leo
Please provide said evidence.
Convince me.
Sharruma
in capable of finishing a coherent Member
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 | 10:41 PM
I'm not sure a world exists beyond my front door!
Maegan
in Tampa, FL - USA Member
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 | 03:32 AM
If we could get to the moon for real, we'd have harvested all the cheese by now, duh!
Speed_399
in italy
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 | 10:09 AM
"The biggest prove that it had never happened is that Russians never did it.
They say that they gave up because it was too late.Being the second is not the same as being the first."
What russian said and what they did is pretty different
"What about "We can do it too"."
they TRIED to do it too but the big rocket that should lift up modules for human mission to moon did never even get to earth's orbit, N-1 rocket failed 5/5 launches all caused to stage one malfunction (probably for it complexity with 30 engines) and after it there was political and technical conflicts to do another project after sergei korolev death in 1966
in 80's years they developed a rocket (energia) potentially able to do a moon mission but used it for buran project in response to NASA space shuttle as they tought it could be used for military purpose and during cold time there was no time for moon imho (and anyway buran did only a unmanned lauch after it russia economical situation crashed and all program was canceled)
I would like to write more but my english is pretty crap as you already saw so it's better if I stop
"Actually none of them ever developed any of those ,concidering the fact they had to pass the heavy radiation belt in order to reach the Moon."
Actually, spacecrafts can be equiped with a little bit of radiation shielding. They go through the van allen belts real quick, so are only exposed for a very short period, and the spacecraft should only need a small amount of shielding to be able to protect its human passengers for the very short amount of time needed. This is reality, not he fantastic four.
Even the scientist who theorized and later described the radiation belts in question goes on record as stating that someone would have to remain there for a lllooonnnggg period of time in order to receive a lethal dose.
Please keep this thread open long enough to see what leo has to say after the results come back and there's photographic proof!
Oh, thats' right! Those will just be part of the conspiracy too right? What feeble minded people we have walking around...
