|
prussian blue
|
Posted By:
Rick
Dec 28, 2004
|
I just saw this web site on Something Awful and it's just too disturbing for me to believe it's true. If anyone can confirm that it's fake, it would be a great relief.
the link to their site is: Prussian Blue
It's 11 year old twins that are in a a musical group together singing about and preaching white power.
thanks for your time, guys.
Rick
|
Comments
|
Page 5 of 16 pages ‹ First < 3 4 5 6 7 > Last › |
Tuoni
in Florida
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 05:12 AM
"It is absolutly relevant."
Wow! Eyz, you popped out of nowhere.  |
Nick
in Merrie Olde Englande
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 05:20 AM
there difference is- an i realise that i am going by the lyrics of the two girls in question, which perhaps do not reflect your views- that celebrations of black or hispanic culture do not have a view to establishing their way of life at the expense of all others. lynx and lamb talk continually about a 'future for white children'. to me that is far too reminiscient of the future for aryans that hitler propounded. |
Nick
in Merrie Olde Englande
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 05:21 AM
my apologies for the inexplicable typos at the start of that post |
Tuoni
in Florida
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 05:26 AM
"that celebrations of black or hispanic culture do not have a view to establishing their way of life at the expense of all others."
First off, I'm not perfect, typos are acceptable hehe..
Second, Rap is black culture and is 80-90% anti-white.
In the case of hispanics, just a month ago groups of hispanics attacked a protest in california. Sending an old woman to the hospital. Telling whites to "Go back to England". BTW Blacks where among the protesters attacked.
http://www.saveourstate.org/ |
Tuoni
in Florida
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 05:29 AM
"to me that is far too reminiscient of the future for aryans that hitler propounded."
I for one am not a Hitler fan.
Some are, but they have the right to like him, just as you have the right dislike him. |
Tuoni
in Florida
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 05:35 AM
Now, I really should go get some sleep.
In parting.. If you claim to have an open mind, actually open it. Don't close it when convenient for you. |
Boo
in The Land of the Haggii...
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 05:44 AM
I could say the same to you. |
LaMa
in Europe
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 06:02 AM
the fact remains that all people have the same ancient ancestors, possibly a community as small as 10,000 (due to ice ages etc), who were all black as night - Nick
As much as I agree with Nick on his general viewpoint on the matter discussed, here I have to disagree on a matter of detail that happens to be my professional field as a scientist. We really do not know what skin-color our ancestors were. They could have been black, white, yellow, red, brown, khaki, who knows even blue or green. |
LaMa
in Europe
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 06:26 AM
To turn back to the real topic of discussion:
The fact is clear, simply by looking at their lyrics (e.g. "Aryan man Awake"), that these girls Lamb and Lynx talk about a war to be waged againts those who threaten them, and call for hate and fury (war, hate and fury are literally in the 'Aryan Man awake" text). This is a call for violence and hate, I cannot take it as something else.
Their texts also contain references that appear to glorify Nazi Germany, Nazi ideology and the war the Third Reich waged. They talk about "fallen storm troopers of the North", a reference to the SS as I read it. In fact, the whole word "Aryan" is a strong referencer, as is the persistent use of Wagnerian symbolism.
And they put doubt to the holocaust in an interview.
So for me, these are not innocent 12 year old girls singing a song. These (meaning not just Lynx and Lamb but also the persons and organizations behin them) are Neo-Nazi's, people that glorify a past which was one of the most tragic and dark experiences of the past century, one of death and cruelty and torture and meegalomania and ideologic mania. |
LaMa
in Europe
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 06:42 AM
It means that they also appear to glorify the people that ran-over, occupied, ruined and plundered my country. The ones that took away my father from his mother and deported the familly out of their hometown. The ones that shot at my uncle, then still a child. The ones that bombed the heart out of Rotterdam, after a cease-fire was already agreed on. The ones that deported Jews, Roma and Homosexuals, as well as political adversaries to concentration camps. The ones that tortured people. The ones that took the whole male population of the Dutch village Putten to a concentration camp, as revenge for a resistance group killing one German officer at Putten. 661 males, civilians including boys, were deported, and only 49 of them came back alive.
AND DON'T DENY IT! THIS HAPPENED! |
LaMa
in Europe
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 06:45 AM
So go on, Glorify them, you Bastards! |
Nick
in Merrie Olde Englande
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 08:43 AM
first, my apologies LaMa, i always thought the accepted wisdom was that we originated from black Africans.
second, as for blacks and hispanics being anti-white, is it really sensible to retaliate? Lynx and Lamb urge us to wage war against them. Tuoni and others spoke against illegal aliens entering the country, but who's to say it belongs to you? Native Americans were there before you, and what did colonists do to them as soon as they got there? they took their land and massacred them. do you now fear that another racial group will do the same to the whites?
why must we fight each other like this? |
Nick
in Merrie Olde Englande
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 08:57 AM
LaMa, is it at least agreed that we originate from a group who were the same colour? |
Yama the Spcae Fish
in Sakura Subconscious Domain Summer
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 09:09 AM
Yeah, that's exactly why I like the music of Asia. Not because it, you know, sounds GOOD. I guess you think that if I actually identified as white or whatever instead of as human, I'd be listening to Prussian Blue and enjoying it, god-fucking-damn it. But no. And that's why I'm listening to Tantra Lounge right now.
As for the thread bump, that was done by Earl Turner, the non-white hating FREAK, not by me.
And tell your pshychologist (sic) friend to analyze ...and the heavens rained fire. You only analyzed one drawing, and it was total shit.
99 percent of what Eyzwydopen says about me is a combination of guesswork and just plain stupidity. |
David B.
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 09:16 AM
Well the arguments between advocates of the 'multi-regional hypothesis' and 'out-of-A*' (where A* is either Africa, Asia or whatever their personally preferred interpretation of the scant fossil examples is) could hardly said to be settled; but...
There are many unresolved problems with MRH, and many converging lines of evidence for OOA, so for the moment the weight of evidence is for Homo Sapiens arising in a single geological region (we don't know for sure where) some 200,000 years ago and radiating out from it.
You were perhaps confused by the origins of the Homo line itself, these go back about 2 million years ago to Homo ergaster, which did AFAWK evolve in Africa and spread out from there.
(While looking up the spelling of ergaster, I found a good link on the whole subject. See http://www.actionbioscience.org/evolution/johanson.html) |
Nick
in Merrie Olde Englande
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 09:38 AM
Thanks David, i shall take a closer look at that once i no longer have to cram useless stuff into my head for exams. |
LaMa
in Europe
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 11:03 AM
Nick, the origin of the human species lies in Africa. And the genetic origin of todays population of Homo sapiens lies in Africa, some few hundred thousands of years ago (that is not necessarily the same as "the origin of Homo sapiens is in Africa")
But that does not mean our ancestors were black. Maybe the people in the founding population in Africa were not black ~200 000 years ago. Just because todays (sub-Saharan) people in Africa are black, does not mean they were too ~200 000 years ago. The people in Africa evolved too during that period, after all. Most scientists agree that racial features like skin color have emerged rather recently. There is no way of knowing which skin color our ancestors had. |
LaMa
in Europe
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 11:06 AM
Nevertheless, it is likely of course that under a tropical sun, they might have had a tan... |
LaMa
in Europe
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 11:07 AM
Or maybe just a fur coat.... |
David B.
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 | 11:32 AM
Nick, the origin of the human species lies in Africa. And the genetic origin of todays population of Homo sapiens lies in Africa, some few hundred thousands of years ago (that is not necessarily the same as "the origin of Homo sapiens is in Africa")
As a scientist, you should be careful not to dismiss the multi-region hypothesis out of hand. It has yet to be proven wrong after all. Also, the hypothetical African origin of Homo sapiens (based largely on studies of genetic diversity) is not uncontested, with some genes (betaglobin for example) being both (a) older than the posited African ancestor of H.s., and (b) prevalent in modern Asian populations.
Behaviourally modern humans are thought to have arisen in Africa about 40-50 kYA (from the ages and diversity of tools found), and thereafter exploded to all corners of the old world in short order. There is no evidence whether this was a physical exodus or a cultural export though. |
|
Page 5 of 16 pages ‹ First < 3 4 5 6 7 > Last › |
In order to post comments you have to register as a member of the site. We were forced to restrict commenting because spammers were flooding the comment form with spam and crashing the server.
|
Note: This thread is located in the Old Forum of the Museum of Hoaxes.
|
