|
prussian blue
|
Posted By:
Rick
Dec 28, 2004
|
I just saw this web site on Something Awful and it's just too disturbing for me to believe it's true. If anyone can confirm that it's fake, it would be a great relief.
the link to their site is: Prussian Blue
It's 11 year old twins that are in a a musical group together singing about and preaching white power.
thanks for your time, guys.
Rick
|
Comments
|
Page 15 of 16 pages ‹ First < 13 14 15 16 > |
Tuoni
|
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 | 02:53 PM
"One common complaint that you have made (which seems not to have been addressed) is the "if you're so tolerant, tolerate my intolerance" argument."
This proves you have never read most of my posts just skimmed them.
Even Yama can tell you I am actually tolerant considering I am a WN.
I am only intolerant about Israel (once again I have to point out I am not anti-jewish, just anti-israel), Illegal Aliens, Pedophiles and other sexual predators, and a few other things along those lines.
I am not intolerant about the average jewis person, blacks, asians, legal immigrants or anything else along *those* lines.
Sorry, but your rebuttals don't quite fit with *my* beliefs. Try looking here for the kinds of people that you are trying to refute.
http://www.americannaziparty.com/ |
David B.
Member
|
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 | 06:09 AM
This proves you have never read most of my posts just skimmed them.
Proves nothing, I was paraphrasing. I'll be more specific.
One common complaint that you have made (which seems not to have been addressed) is the "If you are intolerant of anothers opinion you are a bigot. That means if you are a bigot towards bigots, you are a hypocrite.".
So 'bigoted' = 'intolerant', 'bigoted towards bigots' = 'intolerant of intolerance' = 'hypocrite?'. So should the tolerant tolerate the intolerant (to avoid hypocrisy')?
(See previous post.)
It's a true paradox, not one of those crappy FC ones. The only way for tolerance to be maintained is to defend it from those who would do away with it, the intolerant. Where anyone puts the division between 'what I must tolerate' and 'what I must defend tolerance against' is a personal choice. Too often, any expression of disapproval by a 'tolerant' person and they're labelled a hypocrite; it's just a lazy, knee-jerk answer.
For the record, you are entitled (and welcome) to your opinions. I don't think I ever called you a Nazi. Oh, and I still think you are wrong. |
Yama the Space Fish
in Sakura Subconscious Domain Summer
|
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 | 07:06 AM
Yes, he's tolerant for a WN. All that means is, if some white natioanlists were attacking somebody for being Jewish or Asian or African, he'd sit there idly and twiddle his thumbs instead of actually participating. |
Tuoni
|
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 | 01:06 PM
Yes, he's tolerant for a WN. All that means is, if some white natioanlists were attacking somebody for being Jewish or Asian or African, he'd sit there idly and twiddle his thumbs instead of actually participating.
Yama, thank you for attempting to be nice to me, but you are still wrong with that.
I would stop them. I abhor violence. |
French Canadian
|
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 | 03:33 AM
Forget about that parasite ED he's a mentally retarded/challenged "person". All he can do is to violently critisize my spelling, and i don't give a damn about it since im a french speaking canadian. If you don't believe in genetical superiority of the white race then i suggest you to take your luggages and go live A WEEK in Zimbabwe, Zambwa, Rwanda, Mexico, Haiti, Cuba, Brazil, Africa etc... you woudn't last a DAY. Enough to write a book, what am i saying an encyclopedia. Not Only "Anti-Racists" are extremely virulent and brutal they are also fiercely retarded. |
Yama the Space Fish
in Sakura Subconscious Domain Summer
|
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 | 12:10 PM
And if you want to live in a monoethnic society, I suggest Somalia or North Korea. |
David B.
Member
|
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 | 04:01 PM
If you don't believe in genetical superiority of the white race [...] go live A WEEK in Zimbabwe, Zambwa, Rwanda, Mexico, Haiti, Cuba, Brazil, Africa etc... you woudn't last a DAY
Yet 'they' can live their entire lives there, AND can do the same over here. That pretty much would seal them having the greater fitness (if it were in any respect true).
 |
Tuoni
|
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 | 04:58 PM
it's just a lazy, knee-jerk answer.
Wrong, it's a true answer. Why should intolerant people be tolerant if others are allowed to be intolerant?
Why should I as a WN be tolerant of you if you are intolerant of me.
In fact that makes me more tolerant of you because I *am* tolerant of your beliefs. I just don't share them. |
David B.
in Reading, England.
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 | 05:22 AM
Now who's skimming?
Or do you have a specific argument as to why a tolerant society should not be able to defend that feature of tolerance against those who would do away with it?
Intolerance is defined as "Unwilling to tolerate differences in opinions, practices, or beliefs. Opposed to the inclusion or participation of those different from oneself."
Tolerate is defined as "To allow without prohibiting or opposing".
So you are not intolerant because you disagree with me, similarly I am not intolerant of you because I disagree with you. As I said in the same post you quoted, "you are entitled (and welcome) to your opinions", you really shouldn't have skimmed that bit as it shows your claim, "that makes me more tolerant of you because I *am* tolerant of your beliefs" was demonstrated to be false before you made it.
Why should intolerant people be tolerant if others are allowed to be intolerant?
If you were an intolerant person, then you'd have gone beyond holding an opinion, you would be "opposing the participation or inclusion" of whatever group you were intolerant of, hence you'd be seeking to undermine tolerance. Turn it around; if an intolerant person believes it's alright to be intolerant (after all, they themselves are, right?), what grounds do they have to criticize anyone else for being intolerant? It's hypocritical.
It's not the holding of contrary opinions that should not be tolerated (and yes, there are plenty of intolerant anti-racists too), it's the acting on them to the diminishment of the tolerance of society. It's not even an isolated case, any human liberty is faced with the problem that to protect itself, it can't extend itself to those who would destroy it. Having freedom of political expression does not mean allowing insurgence or terrorism, however politically motivated.
Mind you, I never accused you of being intolerant in the first place (unless you count the generic 'you' of my paraphrasal, which I corrected). I don't think you're intolerant, Tuoni, just biased, wrong, dishonest and uncivil. Oh, and now I can add hypocritical. |
Oscar_Yeager
in Jew York
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 | 08:35 AM
Well anyways, I just read on one of the Prussian Blue fan sites that their 2nd CD is due out soon, and that it will contain much less content pertaining to White Nationalism, so you racially dead people should be happy.
I know that the girls are starting to get into Green Day, and other more mainstream bands. |
Tuoni
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 | 02:36 PM
Mind you, I never accused you of being intolerant in the first place (unless you count the generic 'you' of my paraphrasal, which I corrected). I don't think you're intolerant, Tuoni, just biased, wrong, dishonest and uncivil. Oh, and now I can add hypocritical.
Hehe, I am actually beginning to like you.
I am biased, wrong is a matter of opinion which is subjective, I am exceedingly honest (ask any of your fellow anti-racialists that post on my blog) and very very civil.
The only time I am not-civil is when people are not being civil to me. Am I hypocritical? Sure, on some things, the same as everyone.
However, according to you anti-racialists, I am sitting on a lower moral ground. What is your excuse?  |
Yama the Space Fish
in Sakura Subconscious Domain Summer
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 | 05:37 PM
I think Prussian Blue's problem is that they're sucking too much. That sucking is getting to be a big problem. Don't talk. Just shut up and play the frigging tuba. |
Irish Drunk
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 | 07:47 PM
Prussian Blue Message Board |
French Canadian
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 | 01:51 AM
"Yet 'they' can live their entire lives there, AND can do the same over here. That pretty much would seal them having the greater fitness (if it were in any respect true)."
Ewww...actually little man, no. 'they', don't live their live, 'they' actually survive or starve to death. And 'they', survive in here. I was talking about ignorant, hypocrite, people like you David B., always defending thoses third worlders but not willing or not having the courage to live in africa misery. typical.
Look what's funny about you guys is no matter what, you will never admit being wrong. Hell, go live in Cuba, and starve to death. |
French Canadian
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 | 01:56 AM
"I think Prussian Blue's problem is that they're sucking too much. That sucking is getting to be a big problem. Don't talk. Just shut up and play the frigging tuba."
Funny how idiots low-lives like this 'person' loves to insult people on no basis to make themselves feel important. Your sucking beat them by a mile ahead. |
Tuoni
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 | 02:53 AM
I think Prussian Blue's problem is that they're sucking too much. That sucking is getting to be a big problem. Don't talk. Just shut up and play the frigging tuba.
Actually, this insult is one of the most clever and unique I have ever seen.
What I find even more interesting is that, Yama, a 21 yo college student is still picking on children 8 years younger than him. |
French Canadian
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 | 02:54 AM
Guess what, the moderator erased my posts...he thinks you guys are too stupid to handle to truth. There's only one word for thoses kind of people and this kind of website. |
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 | 02:59 AM
I've told you before French Canadian, that inflamatory posts will be removed. If you don't like it go elsewhere. |
Tuoni
in Florida
Member
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 | 03:17 AM
Well anyways, I just read on one of the Prussian Blue fan sites that their 2nd CD is due out soon, and that it will contain much less content pertaining to White Nationalism, so you racially dead people should be happy.
I know that the girls are starting to get into Green Day, and other more mainstream bands.
Oscar, where did they say that? On the forum? (If so I must have missed that post) Once it get's back up I will look for it so I can make a blog entry about it. Let's see what my resident anti-racialists think about a more mainstream CD. |
Tuoni
in Florida
Member
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 | 03:24 AM
I also want to point out to people here. If you have questions, concerns or just want to debate the issues in an unmoderated format, visit my blog. There is currently a nasty debate (mixed with flames, between both sides.
I tend to take a more neutral position there. I am biased towards the racialist side but on my blog I allow antis to say whatever they want just as I do WNs. If you decide to flame though keep it somewhat on topic. Trolling comments will be deleted. |
|
Page 15 of 16 pages ‹ First < 13 14 15 16 > |
In order to post comments you have to register as a member of the site. We were forced to restrict commenting because spammers were flooding the comment form with spam and crashing the server.
|
Note: This thread is located in the Old Forum of the Museum of Hoaxes.
|
