New Forum | Museum of Hoaxes | Login | Register as a Member | Search

Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus
Posted By:
Scifinerdgrl
Dec 07, 2004

http://zapatopi.net/treeoctopus.html

When I first saw this I thought it was for real. If only I'd scrolled all the way to the bottom I would have seen "People for the Ethical Treatment of Pumpkins" listed! That might have tipped me off.
Category: Animals; Replies: 59

Comments
Listed in chronological order. Newest comments at the end.
Page 1 of 3 pages  1 2 3 >
Maegan
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2004 | 10:17 AM
Why it's endangered:
and booming populations of its natural predators, including the bald eagle and sasquatch.

Cute page!
catbarloo
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 | 08:39 PM
I'd still like to buy one of their coffee mugs though.
Mark-N-Isa
in Midwest USA
Member
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 | 11:36 AM
Alex,
We would like to suggest that you give a light I.Q. test before allowing non-members to post. Children who don't even get that they're at a site called "Museum of Hoaxes" and the implications of that title, and in spite of that still don't get from the links (i.e. People for the ethical treatment of pumpkins) that something is bogus, shouldn't be allowed to pollute the air with their drivel. If these students are so worried about wasting their precious time they should quit skipping ENGLISH classes. There is a difference between their, there, and they're. Learn it ladies. Ur doesn't equal "you are" or "You're" or "your." I liked this little link because it provided me with a laugh, until I lost 5 minutes of my life trying to read the drivel this lady (I suspect they're one in the same) posted.
padego
Member
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 | 11:41 AM
Ahem...
It's octopi not octopusses.
Back to class children
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 | 12:02 PM
Ahem...
Octopodes.


padego, please see me after class.



(I realize that both octopi and octopodes are acceptable, I just wanted to be an ass)
Mark-N-Isa
in Midwest USA
Member
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 | 12:20 PM
I prefer the Bond way, you know James Bond, and just calling it "Pussy Galore"! smile
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 | 12:26 PM
Far funnier and slightly more subtle : Sound Clip

Plenty O'Toole: Hi, I'm Plenty.

James Bond: But of course you are.

Plenty O'Toole: Plenty O'Toole.

James Bond: Named after your father perhaps?
padego
Member
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 | 12:27 PM
Sorry,
I just wish I could stop making those stupid mistakpodes.
X
Member
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 | 12:45 PM
Are the 3 entries in CAPS the same person????
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 | 01:00 PM
More than likely
RAe
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 | 01:23 PM
I really enjoyed that hoax... it was cute. Of course, I do have to say I agree with most of the people typing after the person typed in caps. Obviously, they needed to get back to english class. Thanks for the laughs everyone!
X
Member
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 | 01:55 PM
There ya go Paul. Avatar slow enough???
Doug McLeod
in Sydney Australia
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 | 04:34 PM
Have you considered a 'multi-girl' theory; teenage girls like to cruise the net together. The theme of messages 2 and 3 revolves around the writer's feelings of hurt, both to herself and the octupi, whereas the first message has a more distinctive theology concerned with truth, and a greater concern with the emotions of the recipient. Although we are not told the author of the third message, (Lertropoke is not a real name, corresponding in Google only to this message), in the dialect in use at the time it was possible to construct the name 'Kristy' as a derivative of Kristen, the given name of writer number 2. Note the characteristic -y ending. There are also clues in the language used. Writer 1 consistently uses the 'ur' form for 'your' and derivatives, whereas writer 2 gives the more classically correct form 'your'. Writers 2 and 3 are also more extravagent in their use of exclamation marks, where we again see a more measured tone from writer 1.

In determining when these letters were written it is worth considering that '1 Cross Girl' suggests a response made at the time of first viewing the website, whereas 2 and 3 Cross Girl could have been composed in the post-spectating period when a deeper understanding of the writer's emotions was available. This suggests that 2,3 Cross Girl were composed around the same time whereas 1 Cross Girl dates from an earlier period.

I would conclude that by any reasonable standards of exegesis, 1 Cross Girl could not have been written by the same author as 2 and 3 Cross Girl. I further suggest that internal clues make it highly likely that 3 Cross Girl was written by the same author as 2 Cross Girl, and at around the same time. It is true that some of my friends have found a different author for 3 Cross Girl based on minor differences of taxonomy, but this must be regarded as speculative.
Rod
in the land of smarties.
Member
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 | 06:04 PM
All I can say about the above post is "Wow, and I thought 'I' had too much time on my hands...".

"I further suggest that internal clues make it highly likely that 3 Cross Girl was written by the same author as 2 Cross Girl, and at around the same time." - Doug McLeod

You didn't happen to notice that they were posted only one minute apart to come to this conclusion, did you?
Smerk
in to mischief
Member
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 | 06:39 PM
Such a pity that the link to Greanpeas doesn't work. Mottled roach is good! Their aroma closely resembles certain flowers ...boquet of vintage camel urine! It seems as though the only legit animals linked to are the Christmas Island crabs.
Nettie
in Perth, Western Australia
Member
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 | 12:04 AM
Going back a wee bit, I agree that an IQ test would be good for non members. Perhaps (since this seems to be a popular subject we gripe about) they need to be able to destinguish between your and you're and then between there, their and they're. It's just a bit harder than what they normally have too do to post.
Smerk
in to mischief
Member
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 | 12:14 AM
Ah, the wonders of the English Language, spoken in many dialects...don't forget whether, weather and wether! wink
Rod
in the land of smarties.
Member
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 | 12:18 AM
Yes, and let us not forget destinguish and distinguish, nettie.
Rod
in the land of smarties.
Member
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 | 12:27 AM
And the many variations of too, to, and two, too?
Smerk
in to mischief
Member
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 | 12:56 AM
Hmmm, we'd better be careful...there's a nasty thread going about being off-topic among other things... cool smirk
Page 1 of 3 pages  1 2 3 >

Name:

Email (if you want to be notified of responses):

Location:

URL:

Note: To prove that you're a human being, not an automated spam bot, you've got to type in the word you see below. If you register as a member of the site you won't have to do this. Once registered, you'll then also need to login. If you're seeing this notice, and you've already registered, that means you haven't logged in. As a member you also won't have to enter your personal info every time you leave a comment.

Submit the word you see below:


Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?