|
Page 3 of 11 pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > Last › |
flim
|
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2005 | 07:08 PM
Of course he's dead. The soul of anyone who could write "Mull of Kintyre" must be dead... |
Paul is ALIVE!
in no
|
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 | 08:12 AM
Ok, i have heaps proving paul is alive, if u want to know just ask on this forum, and there all very true and convinsing, so if u think he's dead, but doesn't want to believe it, i ave the truth that in fact he is alive. |
Paul is alive
in no
|
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 | 08:16 AM
its paul is ALIVE! again click on my name, there are some things there. I have plenty more though. |
Duh he's alive
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 | 06:56 PM
duh he's alive. I know exactly how to prove every stupid little "clue" wrong, but that would take too long to type. For instance, when you hear "I buried Paul" at the end of Strawberry Feilds he is actually saying "Cranberry sauce." They electronically manipulated it so they could sell more records. the Beatles had no say in this, however. In Glass Onion Lennon said "Here's another clue for you all, the walrus was paul" he was actually making fun of the idiots that believe in this "paul is dead" crap. But of course, there are those poor souls that are waaay too deep in the matter and I'm afraid they have gone insane over this long enough that NOBODY can convince them. |
Kenneth
in kansas
|
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 | 02:12 PM
ok first of all im young but i beleive the beatles are the best band of all time. and i think that anyone who believes that mccartney is dead is an idiot.
first of all. if he was the remaining beatles would've told us. they wouldnt have kept it a secret
second of all. nobody can immitate pauls voice
third of all. just bc there are clues of the album doesnt corfirm the question, it coulve just been a joke. theres no REAL proof.
and thats all i have to say |
carlos gonzalez
in MARACAIBO-VENEZUELA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 | 12:32 PM
HELOW TO EVERYBADY, I JUST WANNNA TELL YOU THAT IF PAUL WOULD BE DEAD, I COUDL NOT BE HIDDEN FOR ALL THIS TIME. PAUL SAID IN AN INTERWIE THAT HE DECIDED TO SEPARATE FROM BEATLES AND TO BE ALONE (SINGER) BECAUSE OF THE JOHN LENNON BEHAVIOR WHILE THEY LIVED TOGETHER AT PAUL |
DFStuckey
in Auckland New Zealand
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 | 04:40 AM
Thank you Carlos for that opinion. It was certainly from you.
In any event, realising that Paul is a vegan, could it be that he isn't dead, but just smells that way? |
carlos gonzalez
in venezuela, maracaibo
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 | 05:07 PM
paul, is a poet, as the beatles were; they played, making some song of real life. in a son "i don`t believe" of jonh lennon, after go separeted from beathes he said that he changed all consept of living, and invited us to join him. is an adviced to try to get better, they people`s thinking, to do not believe blimdy every things we see, ear,. be more concience, in our life. |
meep
|
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 | 06:16 AM
its hilarious the whole conspiracy theory. Wanna hear my theory, (ur gonna anyway) the beatles heard about the conspiracy theories and where like lets have a bit of fun with this, entertainers need to be entertained too, so where like lets chuck in some "clues" for the hell of it, hell i would if i was in the same position
anyway his dad got up and testified in court that "this is my son"
the beatles lost paul and instantly found somone who looked exactly the same with the same singing and song writing caperbilities? i think not |
DFStuckey
in Auckland New Zealand
|
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 | 06:30 AM
Whoever he is, he has a new album coming out soon.
Besides which, did anyone here ever believe that the Rolling Stones would still be touring by the time half the Beatles actually were dead? |
Kyte
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 | 01:12 AM
Wouldn't the most obvious thing to do, what with today's technology, would be to just take a DNA test? I mean come on, that simple. |
meep
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 | 02:35 AM
cos ppl like believeing what they want, if you did a blood teast ppl would still come up with concpiracy theoris on how the DNA test was rigged etc
ppl love conspiracies |
Boo
in The Land of the Haggii...
Member
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 | 05:16 PM
Why should he do a DNA test? The rumour is hardly damaging any record sales. And, even if they were, he's pretty much rich enough already.
I don't think he cares that a tiny minority of people think he might be a lookalike. |
katie
in NY
|
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 | 08:33 PM
I Don't Believe hes dead but its kinda fun to look into it !
: Has anyone ever heard the rumur that john was the only bandmember beside "William Cambell" the "replacement" who knew paul died and he was killed because of this , John Lennon was the greatest man who ever lived and every time i hear beutiful boy i cry !
: Does anyone else get freaked out by revoloution 9 ! |
DFStuckey
in Auckalnd New Zealand
|
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 | 10:39 PM
katie, any music that Yoko Ono is involved with freaks me out in a totally wrong way:)
But seriously, John certainly could write music alone or with Paul and his loss was the biggest blow to popular music for that decade. As to theories about his death, well, Sean alwyas claimed that the US department of State feared his influence on young people, going so far as to say "They knew that if he (John) told kids to blow up the Capitol building, they would do it."
This theory jars with a recent release of a risk assessment about Lennon at the Democratic congress that had the FBI conclude that while John had radical ideas and was a natural focus, he "Spends much of his time under the influence of narcotic substances." and was a limited threat. |
Kyte
in France
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 | 03:19 PM
There has been made a documentary on the subject.
It's called: who buried Paul mcCartney? by Wouter van Opdorp
http://www.cinema.nl/cinema/videofragments/index.jsp?videofragments=24021121
http://www.whoburiedpaulmccartney.com |
Karin
in Colgone
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 | 03:01 AM
HI!
I don't believe Paul is dead. My theory is, that Paul had an accedent in 1966, but didn't die. He broke his tooth, you can see it on the Anthology-viedeo for "Rain". Well, somebody heard of it and tells everyone that Paul had an accident and died and now the Beatles put little clues in their songs and sleeves etc.
Now, the beatles (with Paul) heard of it and thought: "Well, that's funny." and put little clues in their songs etc. to fool the people! Now who believes Paul is dead,may believe it, who doesn't believe Paul is dead, than it may be so!
Understand me?
That is what I think!
And I don't think that one man (William Campbell) can play the rest of his life anyone else! No one would make it! |
conichiwa
in china
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 | 04:47 PM
i like hilary duff. and pickles. the beatles are ALL DEAD |
DFStuckey
in Auckland New Zealand
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 | 05:05 PM
Konichiwa, conichiwa. Even if Paul is dead, that still leaves one Beatle around.
Mind you, your opinion leaves much to disrecommend it if you like Hilary Duff. As to pickles, that is a poser . . . Though Hilary posing with a pickle raises intriguing possibilities. 
Yes, I am the eggman. Sue me. |
jordan
|
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 | 08:10 PM
paul is not dead, any one who belives that bull shit is stupid besides since he was the best beatle they would of fell apart without paul and sounded like crap. |
|
Page 3 of 11 pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > Last › |
