|
Page 7 of 11 pages ‹ First < 5 6 7 8 9 > Last › |
Esme
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 | 10:12 PM
Sorry to double post (again), but I meant to finish a thought and never did.
To add to one of my statements:
"I never said I had hard proof..."
I didn't say that I do, but I do. The Paul that is alive and well today is the hardest proof of all. Until someone can provide better proof than that (ie: a confession by Paul or someone who would know for a fact that the "real Paul" really did die and was replaced), then this proof will have to suffice. |
The Debater
in w/e
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 | 09:12 PM
thank you Esme! Also, you do prove a point about how the Paul McCartney living today is real! I mean who would be able to hide someone sooooo famous for sooooo long of being dead for sooooo long! To me it's something that is possible, but it's too long to be possible! No one can hide that someone famous, like Paulie, has died! I mean come on?!?!? Who's wanna waste their time to do that! lol! But really who would want to do that and who would act like Paulie without seeing their own family and not being seen? o.o;? |
Rob
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 | 03:15 PM
It's been proven that fingerprints of the replacement and one taken of Paul before 1966 do not match. It's been proven the voices do not match. Three different voices have been found on Beatles records. The early years belonging to Paul McCartney alone. The later years including Paul's voice and two other voices. DNA evidence is tougher to come by, but if you compare members of the replacement's paternal family with his own children, you would see the genetic resemblance.
The Beatles have gotten away with the switch. It was a different time when the switch was made--there wasn't the mass media we have today. But it's not like people haven't suspected something's different...
Starting in October of 1966, rumors began to run rampent that the Beatles would break-up. The Beatles themselves spoke out of both sides of their lips, on one hand saying they're tired of everything and splitting up, and on the other hand saying everything is fine and dandy and they'll continue to make music. The Beatles stopped touring, they changed their style, their music, their behavior, their dress, their hair, their mood and mannerism, their outlook on life, etc...
The claim that the Beatles themselves created a death hoax to sell records is a ludicrous arguement. The Beatles were at the top of the music industry and generating sales unmatched by any other act. They wouldn't have needed to resort to some kind of morbid stunt in order to sell records.
John, George, Ringo and even the replacement have all admitted Paul is dead. Paul's paternal family is cognizant of his fate and aware of the replacement. The replacement has remained in contact with his paternal family through the years. And on a side note, Paul almost drowned in 1966-- he got swept out to see while swimming off the Canary Islands. You've never heard anything about that, but it really kind of set precendence for how they'd react to a freak incident.
I would suggest you spend a good deal of time looking at vintage photos of Paul McCartney. People forget what he actually looked like.
http://www.jamespaulmccartney.org/
I know of a girl who said it helped her to see the difference in the two men by looking at Paul's half-sister Ruth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8w3M3yQ6Jc |
Esme
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 | 06:05 PM
LOL! So... if you grow a few inches and change your style, dress, hair, mood, the style of your music, mannerism, outlook on life, and I read somewhere (probably a bogus source somewhere on the web) that your fingerprints were taken before "the incident" and after (and that the prints didn't match)... I am supposed to believe that you have been replaced? I'm sorry, but I've looked into it long before I started posting here. I know what you are saying and I've heard it all (even the part about his big growth spurt). All of this is only a bunch of information people gather together to prove that Paul has passed, but they are looking so hard for physical proof and it really has no place here.
The only point I've heard that I may agree with is that it was done as a joke. Not one person said they needed the sales, but they certainly may have done it for sales and a little fun anyway. It is not a ludicrous argument at all if you have half a mind to think about it.
I mean really... *think* about it! *sighs and rolls her eyes* |
The Debater
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 | 09:23 PM
also to add to what you said, Rob. It is good information but I though you would be someone to know that peoples fingerprints can change! Mine have but only once! so hey who knows! also I still think paul is alive and I don't get why (no efence Rob) people think he's dead! I mean if you like his music and stuff you would want to believe he is not dead! Either the people who believe he is dead either don't like him or havn't up dated thereselves with the new music he made! But hey I'm just saying! |
Paul McCartney Lover
in Philippines
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 | 08:05 AM
No! That's just a hoax!! I'm just an 11 years old Beatles fan. And Paul is my favorite beatle! So...I don't believe that he's dead or something. They will not hide paul coz' they loved each other. |
Paul McCartney Lover
in Philippines
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 | 09:51 AM
PAUL IS ALIVE! That's all I can say! ALIVE!! ALIVE!! ALIVE!!! I'm so dissapointed to those people who says that he's dead. You know, he's Cute when he was still young! CUTIE PUAL! PAULIE!! |
The Debater
in Here, There, and Everywhere
|
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 | 11:02 AM
Paul McCartney Lover I soooooo agree with you! I've always wounderd why ppl would say he is dead! Why would they want him to be dead? PAUL ISS THE BEST! ^.^ |
paul mccartney IS alive
|
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 | 04:48 PM
tell me, if paul mccartney died and wuz replaced with some random person, why would that random person keep on writing and recording music after the beatles split up?????itz not like they could hide that they werent paul mccartney!!!!!!!!oh yeah, a normal person who listens to any person speaking or singing backwards is gonna hear gibberish. and the only time that you will hear actual words is if ur listening for them. everyone who thinks paul mccartney is dead can haul their gullible butts over to the netherlands and knock on paul mccartneys front door and ask him if he is dead or not................................................ |
paul mccartney IS alive
|
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 | 05:02 PM
um, rob............some radio dj made up the entire thing about the replacement whose name was william something.there wuz a look a like contest, held when paul wuz ALIVE.and the winner wuz some guy who didnt do anything with the beatles.so dont sit there and try to tell me that all the beatles said that paul wuz dead because john lennon wuz personally freaked out about it and called it "all bullshit" when reports talked to him about it.
ps:r u a rolling stones fan or something?????????????? |
KHAN
in From: Sane World
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 | 04:36 PM
He is exactly the same in every aspect.
Those who believe he's dead are not too bright.
 |
KHAN
in Sane World
|
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 | 01:54 PM
For the people who see 'Faul', there is a disconnect between the "Fab Moptop" Paul, and the "Psychedelic Hippy" Paul with the wierd haircut and moustache.
This fade is a good example of the Paul vs. Faul phenomenon. Even though every feature that would suggest this is the same man matches, the "Pidder" still claims to see two different people.
In the pic below, the left frame is Paul in '66.
The center frame is "Faul" in '67.
The right frame |
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
|
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 | 04:48 PM
Isn't plastic surgery wonderful? It can make you look like anybody.  |
KHAN
in Sane World
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 | 04:07 AM
Plastic surgery can not make you look like anyone. Especially in 1966.
Did plastic surgery also give Faul Paul's lazy eye? |
KHAN
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 | 06:00 AM
[URL=http://imageshack.us][IMG]http://img459.imageshack.us/img459/4306/duhsa7.gif[/IMG][/URL] |
Charybdis
in in Hell
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 | 03:15 AM
Well, plastic surgery isn't perfect, as can be seen from your photos. Obviously they're of two different people. They got the eyes pretty close though they're too high, but there's nothing they could do about that. The cheeks are different, the new Paul has a longer face and is less jowly. They mouth was done very well, though they should have rounded the chin off more.
A good enough job to fool millions of people, but not perfect by any means. |
KHAN
in disbelief :)
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 | 08:46 PM
Whatever drugs you're on, I'd like to try some.  |
KHAN
|
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 | 10:51 PM
Man, that plastic surgeon must have had to smash the hell out of Faul's skull to copy every asymmetrcal feature of Paul's face.
OUCH!!!
[IMG]http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/symmetry.jpg[/IMG]
The only real difference was a haircut and moustache.
[IMG]http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/shave_and_a_Haircut.gif[/IMG] |
The Debater
in somewhere
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 | 12:48 PM
THANK YOU PPL!
Finally some ppl who believe Paul Is alive!
Thank You!
Thanks everyone who believes Paul is still alive!
:] |
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 | 04:21 PM
Oh I know Paul's alive, I just never let facts interfere with a good argument. This would be readily apparent to anyone who actually read all of the posts on this topic. |
|
Page 7 of 11 pages ‹ First < 5 6 7 8 9 > Last › |
