|
Paul Mcartney is dead
|
Posted By:
Paul is dead
Jul 19, 2004
|
paul is dead
|
Comments
|
Page 6 of 11 pages ‹ First < 4 5 6 7 8 > Last › |
esme
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 | 03:25 PM
I hate to double post, but there is no option to edit a post. Anyway, these two photos are circa 1972 (also "post-death"). There is no way it can be said that Paul played with his right hand after he was "replaced by a look-alike" unless there was a rare time when he injured his left hand or something like that.
So far the only point brought to this discussion that has any sort of insight to it is the one stating that they could have just done it to mess around and have fun.
If you think about all the money they made from record sales when people ran out to buy their albums to hear and see these messages for themselves, that in itself explains why they did it. If they were serious about any sort of death I still stick with what I said. It certainly wasn't a literal death because the Paul we see today is the same Paul. |
The Debater
in w/e
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 | 04:33 PM
well i think ur right esme! hes alwaysed played left handed and i still think the great hoax was just a idea so that they could make more money by making ppl buy albums 2 see if the rumors were true or not! ya knoe?  |
Will
in England
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 | 11:02 AM
On this website i found (www.jeffmilner.com/backmasking.htm), there are different songs with apparent messages when you listen to them backwards (some of which are quite spookey). There are a few beatles ones, listen to 'I'm so tired' then listen to it backwards, it sounds like it's saying "Paul is a dead man, miss him, miss him, miss him"
 |
The Debater
in w/e
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 | 11:44 AM
i've heard those messages but there just some stuff that ppl edited so it would kinda sound like that.....beleave me i would knoe... |
Rob
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 | 03:14 AM
James Paul McCartney died in mid September 1966, it suggested the 11th. Rumors of the Paul's death began as early as October according to Bill Harry's McCartney Encyclopedia: Oct 3: (1966) Rumors that Paul is to leave the Beatles begin to appear.
And this book also mentions November as the start of the rumors of PID, although not in the chronology section. Then there was the NY times blurb that quoted Paul as saying he was "no longer one of the Mop Tops"... (late 1966)
Put it all together and perhaps you have an attempt at managing a "situation", whatever that might have been...
If you're going to investigate this whole thing about Paul, I'd recommend you first doing compare the two men and look at everything--face, body, height, vocals, mannerism, personality, playing style--not just try to fit heads together. They don't fit together anyway. Also, look at the behavior and changes of the rest of the Beatles and their girlfriends/wives.
There is absolutely no proof "Paul" is the same man before and after September 1966. All the evidence gravitates to there being two different men--because they are!
But what does it all matter to you any, it's not like it's going to affect your life anyway. It won't put food on your table, or get the kids off to school, or get you that much needed raise at work... So if it makes you feel happy to believe Paul McCartney is still around, go ahead and wallow in your own blissful stupidity, but he really is dead. |
esme
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 | 04:36 PM
If there is no proof that Paul is the same man before and after Sept. of '66, then there is also no legitimate proof that he is a different man. Which leads me to conclude that you are a crock of... well, just another person trying to get everyone to think your opinion is fact I guess. 
No one ever said discovering the truth about Paul would put food on the table or influence our lives in any way. We're here because we've taken an interest in the matter and care to discuss it with others.
Do you think we're all sitting at work, home, or wherever we are applauding you because you've enlightened us with your faulty theory that is filled with holes? If so, I can promise you that isn't the case.
I am not saying your theory is false. This is a discussion and many debates will arise. In my mind, there is no, "I'm right. You're wrong." I know what I believe, but I don't rule out others' ideas unless I have proof that they are false. |
The Debater
in w/e
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 | 07:43 PM
Well, everyone has different opinons but I still think Paul is alive because if he did die I think evryone would know it and if they tried hiding it well they would have really been able to only because the poparotzy are always following them....ne ways you all think wht u want and i'll think of wht i want. Ohhhh and I'll probly correct some of u eventually...lol! not 2 b mean though i'm j like that.....lol! ^.^ ♥ |
Ryan Thomson
in New Hampshire
|
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 | 05:55 AM
 I play violin and fiddle left handed and perform at various public events. Newpaper reporters often take pictures of me playing. On several occassions the picture has made it back to a newspaper editor, who when seeing me playing left handed, has thought that there was an error, and has reversed the image so that in the final printed article it shows me playing right handed! That could have happened to some pictures of Paul as well. |
The Debater
in w/e
|
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 | 11:17 PM
WOW! i never though bout that! that could have most likely hapened! wow! thank u 4 pointing that out! ^.^  |
Rob
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 | 01:39 AM
I do not think you are not understanding what I was saying. So I will try to make this as simple as possible, please follow me. I am NOT making up a theory, sharing an opinion, offering a suggestion, asking a question, or reciting a lovely bed-time fairy tale... What I am telling you is the truth. It is a provable fact.
Paul McCartney died September 1966. He was replaced with another man.
When you look at all the evidence you see that this is an undeniable, indisputible fact. Right now you're not LOOKING, you're not LISTENING, and you're not THINKING.
What you are telling me is that you and others on this board are way too stupid to do your own investigation to see for own eyes and ears that this thing about Paul is actually true. I guess you really don't have the cognitive ability to compare the two men and look at everything--face, body, height, vocals, mannerism, personality, playing style--not just try to fit heads together.
You claim no matter the time period before or after 1966, the man we currently know as "Sir Paul McCartney" is the same guy we've always known as Paul McCartney (the son of Jim and Mary McCartney, brother Michael). Where is your proof it's the same guy? There is none! All the evidence shows us two different men! |
The Debater
in w/e
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 | 08:49 PM
Ok then Rob....thank u for sounding like a complete ass. It seems your really tring to prove a point well don't tell us that it's the truth because it's not. First of all you say you have the proof...well then were is it? You say he's dead....how would you know? and you say It's the truth....then prove the truth with anything you have but remember would you beleive a beatle if he said "I'm not dead" or if he said "He's not dead"?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzMgdHnSQnM |
rtd
|
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 | 12:58 PM
"i've heard those messages but there just some stuff that ppl edited so it would kinda sound like that.....beleave me i would knoe..."
Please don't be a fool, anyone can listen to the songs reverse. I can only assume that you have no idea how to do it. Nobody edited anything, the reverse messages are there. Some more obvious, some less.
Oh, and also, if people don't look at the clues and don't get more into the whole Paul Is Dead thing, then I can't really know how the hell can you have an opinion on it. At least get all the facts, before you say something stupid(basically everything the Debater said- no offense, but you really are a horrible "Debater") |
The Debater
in w/e
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 | 07:23 PM
Oh it doesn't bother me one bit...and ur rite im not always a debater but think who would spend most of there carrer trying to make songs so they have "clues" of Paul being dead? Plus no one can hide someone soooooooooo famous's death...sure it's possible but it's waaaayyy to hard. I wish someone would just come out like paul or ringo or someone i there family or someone that knows paul well and just tell everyone that he is alive or dead. Sometimes I'm not even sure but I think positive and beleave he's alive so that I don't have a bad day! lol! ^.^ Plus I think it's wrong that they say "oh pauls dead!" Well just watch the movie....more like listen to the movie on you tube i have....I didn't make it! lol! ^.^
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzMgdHnSQnM |
Esme
|
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 | 01:42 PM
Rob, like The Debater said, you've given no proof that your opinion is correct. You are saying that it is neither an opinion nor a theory, yet you still haven't enlightened us on how it's not. At first I thought you were just another trouble maker spouting nonsense, but if you're so sure you're right, then please, fill us in with the details.
As for rtd, I don't really see why you just picked on The Debater. S/he never claimed to be the best at debates and everyone makes mistakes. The only people who are not very good at debates are those who take offense to everything and attempt to hurt others just to get their point across. Maybe you should try out for a debate team to learn debating etiquette before bashing others. I think you've done very well so far Debater! |
The Debater
in w/e
|
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 | 07:52 PM
lol! Well thank u Esme! lol! Oh and I'm a girl! lol! ^.^ Plus I only choice the name "The Debater" because well it was a debating thing on paul being dead or not....but really it's more like an oppiniun thingy but I guess were more abating wise! lol! ^.^ and yeah ur rite as well people do debate by making others feel down....well I did that like an idiot 4 the first time on here by saying someone was being an asshole....sry for that but the comment that person put up made it sound like he was a know-it-all so it got me pretty mad and usally things on the interwebs(lol...interwebs) don't get me mad. I'm usally laid back....lol! ^.^ So sry for saying all the asshole stuff...but i hate it when ppl act like..."OH! I know this and u don't hahaha! loser!" nd then have no proof of wht there saying they kno....and wht they "know" is the truth. So I hope we can all stop tlkin bout each other and start only commenting on everyones oppinions and not the person themselves....ig ya knoe wht i mean. lol! ^.^ |
One Who Knows
in Here, There, Everywhere
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 | 09:32 PM
I hope these are helpful to anyone who is looking for answers.
http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/fades/wow.swf
http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/fades/slamdunk.swf
Same funky eyebrows:
Right hand comparison. This clearly shows that Paul's hand shape, size and piano technique (This is a very odd hand position to be identical with two people) remained consistant before and after 1967.
 
Bass playing technique and hand position also remained identical:
Left ear comparison
Right Ear:
Watch Paul as he ages:
 |
Collins
in Um...I'm lost...
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 | 11:02 PM
I know many facts on how paul could be dead or not, but I don't know what to believe =P
If you notice in the abbey road cover, paul is walking bear foot. This represents his corpse, and since george is wearing blue jeans, and that blue shirt, he must be the ditch digger. John lennon was the preacher or something like that in his cloths, and ringo... Er, i forget =P. Also, behind them you'll notice a funeral car, i don't know the exact name though. There's also another car in back of george, and if you look at the license plate, it says and on the road, a car is exactly aligned with paul, showing as if it's going to hit him directly, which brings up the car crash in 1960 that you hear about...
There are also some songs by the beatle, that if played backwards, you'll hear phrases such as=
"Paul is dead, miss him, miss him, miss him"
I don't know the exact song names, but i heard them my self from a friend.
On the sgt peppers lonely hearts club band album cover, there are many referances to paul's death.
Notice that if you hold a mirror up to the picture, the drum says that paul is dead. Or that a hand is placed above pauls head, which in some country means that the person with the hand above their head has departed from life. Also, they say that paul was looking at a girl before he got hit by the car. If you notice in the bottom righthand corner of the album cover, it shows A burning car, and a girl looking at it. Resembling the car that hit paul, and the girl that he was staring at, at the time. Also, john says that paul is the walrus. This refers to a part in one of the beatles songs, containing the phrase, the walrus is dead, or something. Which means that paul is dead.
Here's some lyrics from the song, the day in the life
He blew his mind out in a car
He didn't notice that the lights had changed
A crowd of people stood and stared
They'd seen his face before ...
Can you tell who that's directed at, yeah, paul being hit by a car...
Also, the walrus is a symbol of death in roman mythology, which paul is the walrus o.O
By the way... This site, gives you every single death clue...
http://ludix.com/moriarty/paul.html |
Rob
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 | 05:08 AM
Debater and Esme, you have given no proof that your view about the assertion that Paul is alive and the same man he's always been is correct. You can't prove your view, because it's incorrect and I'm not going to do your homework for you.
"One Who Knows in Here, There, Everywhere" has come close, but s/he has an obvious bias toward trying to present it as a hoax. The rest of you are too stupid to see the differences. |
The Debater
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 | 02:59 PM
Ok, Rob. This is not really based on whos right whos wrong...it's just based on everyones opions (ican't spell). I really am not here to fight with anyone or debate this topic! I'm just here to tell people what I think and then I get to see what other people think. So don't tell me that I have no proof because really I don't care! I'm just here to talk about what I believe and listen to what others believe and why! So sure we don't all agree on the same thing but it doesn't mean you or ne body else can tell us what's rigth and wht's wrong. So please just say what yout hink asbout the topic and don't talk about other peoples thoughts and believes....also not trying to be mean to you! ^.^ |
Esme
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 | 10:07 PM
Rob,
Seriously... if this was court, I would already have half of the evidence people are saying points to the death of Paul thrown out because it's not credible. Unless someone has hard proof (and I certainly don't mean things that they assume mean one thing and could definitely mean something completely different), then they have no case. I never said I had hard proof, I'm just still not on your side of the fence. (That is if you do in fact believe that Paul is deceased.) I'm on the side that needs to be persuaded that you're correct, and I'm just not buying it yet.
On a completely irrelevant note, The Debater is right. Please try to be a bit more kind next time as neither one of us is trying to get on your bad side. |
|
Page 6 of 11 pages ‹ First < 4 5 6 7 8 > Last › |
In order to post comments you have to register as a member of the site. We were forced to restrict commenting because spammers were flooding the comment form with spam and crashing the server.
|
Note: This thread is located in the Old Forum of the Museum of Hoaxes.
|
