#95: Chunnel Blunder
In 1990 the
News of the World reported that the Chunnel project, which was already suffering from huge cost overruns, would face another big additional expense caused by a colossal engineering blunder. Apparently the two halves of the tunnel, being built simultaneously from the coasts of France and England, would miss each other by 14 feet. The error was attributed to the fact that French engineers had insisted on using metric specifications in their blueprints. The mistake would reportedly cost $14 billion to fix.
Comments
Listed in chronological order. Newest comments at the end.
Page 1 of 2 pages 1 2 >
For those less clueful: Dates outside the US are written Day/Month. Therefore 14 is 01/04, or the first of April.
Cheers!
Posted by Scott on Wed Mar 24, 2004 at 08:49 PM
Years later and millions of kilometers in space a satellite was actually thinking it would only have to move a couple of centimeters when it should have been inches and it missed Mars by quite a few miles
Posted by Hugo in Belgium on Tue May 11, 2004 at 05:38 AM
Gee, this is the second one I definitely remember.
Posted by Bryan in Leavenworth, Kansas on Wed Apr 06, 2005 at 11:50 AM
I actually was suckered into a version of this one - until I read it here, I still believed it! (moral: beware publicity, it may be your undoing
Posted by Renee in Canada on Sat Apr 09, 2005 at 01:20 PM
What's not so funny of course is that this wasn't ever intended as a prank - "news of the world" was about as anti-european as a newspaper can be, and this story is a bit of political spin, wrapped in the plausible deniability of an april fools gag.
Posted by Ian in Glasgow, Scotland on Sun Apr 10, 2005 at 03:08 AM
There WERE many problems with the tunnel and the whole thing was blown abysmally out of budget but on this one occasion the News of the World (scummy, to say the least) were wrong.
Posted by Threep in UK on Thu Apr 14, 2005 at 03:28 AM
If you watch the Discovery Channel's "Superstructures" about the building of the tunnel, the two ends were slightly off.
Certainly not by feet, but enough to cause the engineers to sweat out some extra planning.
Posted by SicTim in Minneapolis, MN on Sun Apr 02, 2006 at 08:48 AM
i DEFINITELY remember reading this in my local Arizona paper quoted as fact, so it did get picked up and believed. i was taken in i admit.
Posted by naNcy on Mon Apr 03, 2006 at 12:30 AM
...and it was blamed on the French, of course.
Posted by calli on Tue Apr 11, 2006 at 07:03 PM
something like this actually happened. in 2004 a bridge over the rhine was built to connect the german and swiss part of the town lauffenburg. during the constuction became evident that the two parts of the bridge would join with 54 cm difference.
the error originated from the use of two different heights for sea-level - north-sea in germany and mediterranean in switzerland. this was of course known, and corrected in blue-print, but during construction something went wrong and 27 cm were added on the swiss side instead of being subtracted.
surplus costs were paid by insurance.
Posted by paule on Sun Jul 16, 2006 at 01:09 PM
There was once a Canadian plane that crashed because the people who calculated how much fuel they would need and the people who filled the plane were using different systems
Posted by bob on Fri Dec 29, 2006 at 04:10 PM
British builders have been using the same SI units as the rest of the civilised world since the 1960s, long before the Channel Tunnel project began.
Posted by AJS in UK on Wed Jan 03, 2007 at 02:15 AM
Invicta Radio played a similar joke around that time. Their version involved work stopping on digging the tunnel because the British drilling team had struck oil.
Posted by Soruk in Basingstoke, UK on Sun Apr 01, 2007 at 05:49 PM
This really did happen in Chicago. Several years ago they were trying to connect City Hall and the State of Illinois building via an underground tunnel. They were off by several feet in two directions, so they had to reengineer it to add a short elevator (for access for the disabled) and some stairs--it was otherwise supposed to be a straight-through tunnel.
Posted by Stacey in Chicago on Sun Apr 01, 2007 at 06:49 PM
Too funny--although I posted my comment on an April 1, I wasn't kidding.
Posted by Stacey in Chicago on Sun Apr 01, 2007 at 06:50 PM
I thought it was the convention center in Chicago...the corridor DOES have a sudden ramp of about 2 feet and a jog 4 feet to one side, for no reason.
Of course, Shicago being Shicago, it could easily have happened more than once.
No doubt Daley blamed either the Republicans or non-union contractors.
Posted by Michael Z. Williamson in Greenwood, Indiana USA on Mon Apr 02, 2007 at 09:52 AM
That Canadian plane did NOT crash. The pilot managed to glide it to a safe, fuel-less landing near Gimli, Manitoba, because he was apparently the best pilot ever.
Engineers make mistakes all the time. One once told me that nothing has to be right, it just has to be close.
Posted by greenie on Mon Apr 02, 2007 at 03:58 PM
History of tunnels. They always miss. Sometimes a little, sometimes quite a bit. Not a very good joke. Far too plausible.
Posted by Matt on Sun Apr 08, 2007 at 08:09 PM
I seem to remember reading this. I fell for it completely, for I didn't know it to be a hoax until just now.
Posted by Keith Coogan in Hollywood, California on Thu Apr 12, 2007 at 01:02 PM
I'm pretty sure the only people who would actually fall for this are Americans as most of the world adopted metric as standard measurement a long time ago. When are the Americans going to catch up to the civilised world?
Posted by Jay on Thu May 31, 2007 at 09:13 AM
Page 1 of 2 pages 1 2 >