About the Museum
The Museum of Hoaxes is dedicated to promoting knowledge about hoaxes. (Click here for opening hours, etc.) On our blog we post about dubious- sounding claims, and whatever else strikes our fancy. The site is also home to the Hoaxipedia (the museum's online encyclopedia of hoaxes), and the Hoax Forum.

The museum was created in 1997 by Alex Boese. He's assisted by a staff of deputy curators and docents. Alex is the author of three books, most recently Elephants on Acid: And Other Bizarre Experiments (which has nothing to do with hoaxes). Check out the list of the Top 20 Most Bizarre Experiments of All Time for a preview.



Web Hoax Museum

Prankplace.com
FUNNY T-SHIRTS
Browse our top quality t-shirts, and you are guaranteed to find one perfect for you, or to give as a funny gift to a friend or family member. Our shirts come in your choice of sizes, most are available in Medium, Large, XL, 2XL and 3XL.

COVERT CLICKER
Secretly control the TV, anywhere, any time! This device is so small it is easily concealed in your pocket. It can control volume, change the channel or turn the TV on & off. It works on 90% of all TV's.


#18: Migrant Mother Makeover
In its April 2005 issue, Popular Photography ran an article titled "Can these photos be saved?" about how to remove unsightly wrinkles from photographic subjects. They chose, as an example of a photo that "needed to be saved," Dorothea Lange's "Migrant Mother" photo taken in 1936 during the Great Depression. Lange's photo is one of the most widely admired in the world. It wouldn't be an exaggeration to describe it as the Mona Lisa of photographs, and the Migrant Mother's stoic expression is what makes the image great. Nevertheless, the editors of Popular Photography erased her wrinkles, softened her gaze, and removed her kids, transforming her from an iconic symbol of endurance into a smooth-faced, worry-free soccer mom. Their readers were horrified, not realizing the article was a spoof on the way magazines routinely touch-up celebrity images to remove blemishes and wrinkles. Hundreds wrote in expressing outrage at the defacement of such a classic image. To which the editors replied: Look at the date it was published!

Comments
Listed in chronological order. Newest comments at the end.
Page 1 of 1 pages
I would have been appalled for the shear impact of the photograph. This image is a symbol of the Great Depression faced by farmers and families in 1936. This woman sold the tires from her car to feed her family which meant they were stranded with no crop and no money. When this photo was published in San Francisco, the government rushed 20,000 Ibs. of food to the camp. This photo also influenced John Steinbeck's book 'The Grapes of Wrath.'
Posted by Erin  in  georgia  on  Mon Mar 17, 2008  at  07:27 AM
i dont get it. grrr
Posted by cassie  in  NY  on  Wed Mar 26, 2008  at  04:06 AM
me neither..
Posted by arvind  in  india  on  Mon Mar 31, 2008  at  08:15 AM
I don't understand about the date it was published.
Posted by Lori  in  Germany  on  Tue Apr 01, 2008  at  02:07 PM
Sheer. Not shear duh.
Posted by HAMLETLOVER  on  Tue Apr 01, 2008  at  02:24 PM
The date it was published... dur, they're being told to note that it's April Fools Day. As for the impact of the photo, I think that's an amazing way to get people to think critically about the state of things; why is it okay to rush right into touching up celebrity/model photos, but more artistic photos one would not dream of touching in that way?
Posted by silvy  in  Canada  on  Tue Apr 01, 2008  at  05:04 PM
The date published was April 1, 2005. April Fools Day! Get it?
Posted by Louis  in  San Diego, CA  on  Tue Apr 01, 2008  at  06:02 PM
In response to not getting the date it was published, it was published on April 1, (April Fools Day it was a hoax).
Posted by Gracie  in  AL  on  Tue Apr 01, 2008  at  07:44 PM
(You folks are joking, right?) Anyway, This is awesome! I love it.
Posted by Claire  on  Tue Apr 01, 2008  at  07:51 PM
you don't understand about the date it was published? umm...probably APRIL 1st..did you forget you were reading an article about the top 100 April Fool's Day pranks? gulp
Posted by strychnine  in  taiwan  on  Tue Apr 01, 2008  at  10:32 PM
Publishers were telling people to look at the date it was published because it was APRIL FIRST, hence it was a hoax, nothing to get worked up about. Pretty good, even if a little too deep for some...
Posted by syl  in  North Carolina  on  Wed Apr 02, 2008  at  07:05 AM
The date it was published was April 1st!! helloooo.
Posted by Erin  on  Wed Apr 02, 2008  at  09:56 AM
She's smokin' hot now
Posted by Jake  in  St Louis  on  Wed Apr 02, 2008  at  02:36 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Name:

Email (if you want to be notified of responses):

Location:

URL:

Note: To prove that you're a human being, not an automated spam bot, you've got to type in the word you see below. If you register as a member of the site you won't have to do this. Once registered, you'll then also need to login. If you're seeing this notice, and you've already registered, that means you haven't logged in. As a member you also won't have to enter your personal info every time you leave a comment.

Submit the word you see below:


Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?